Am 16.11.2015 um 14:02 schrieb Özgür Caner:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi Stefan,
> hi Greg,
>
> is there any update on this topic?
>
> We currently experience a similar behavior on our ceph cluster running
> with the Intel X710 network interfaces.
>
> There were variou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Stefan,
hi Greg,
is there any update on this topic?
We currently experience a similar behavior on our ceph cluster running
with the Intel X710 network interfaces.
There were various attempts on this thread to workaround/fix this
issue, but whic
Gregory V
> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> Hi,
>
> any News?
>
> Stefan
>
> Excuse my typo sent from my mobile phone.
>
> Am 26.08.2015 um 16:37 schrieb Rose, Gregory V :
>
>
>
>
AM
To: Rose, Gregory V
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
I have a reproducer!! It happens under cache pressure.
I can reproduce this with the following:
1.) start iperf -s on the system wird X7
M
>> To: Rose, Gregory V
>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>>
>> I have a reproducer!! It happens under cache pressure.
>>
>> I can reproduce this with the following:
>>
>> 1.) start
host.ag]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 5:34 AM
>>> To: Rose, Gregory V
>>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> <mailto:e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>>>
>>> I have a
> From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 5:34 AM
>> To: Rose, Gregory V
>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>>
>> I have a reproducer!! It happen
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 5:34 AM
> To: Rose, Gregory V
> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> I have a repro
egards,
>
> - Greg
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From: Rose, Gregory V [mailto:gregory.v.r...@intel.com]
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 4:26 PM
>
> To: Stefan Priebe
>
> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sour
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Priebe [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 11:14 AM
> To: Rose, Gregory V
> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> IS there a way to check this und
> *To:* Rose, Gregory V
> *Cc:* e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> I still have those ugly drops. Generally it seems it takes 20-48 hours
> before they occour but than it doesn't stop.
>
> The strange thing I've
-Greg
>
> *From:*Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 24, 2015 10:16 AM
> *To:* Rose, Gregory V
> *Cc:* e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> Are there different hw revisions? Cu
AG [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2015 12:14 AM
To: Rose, Gregory V
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
I still have those ugly drops. Generally it seems it takes 20-48 hours before
they occour but than it doesn't
, August 24, 2015 10:16 AM
To: Rose, Gregory V
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
Are there different hw revisions? Currently it seems cards before q4 2014 have
this problem cards build in 2015 work fine.
Stefan
Excuse my typo sent from my mobile
> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> Thanks, will wait or your next mail. Any news regarding the dropped
> packets?
>
> Stefan
> Am 21.08.2015 um 02:51 schrieb Rose, Gregory V:
> > Stefan,
> >
> > Late upd
;> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 4:26 PM
>> To: Stefan Priebe
>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>>
>> Stefan,
>>
>> You will need to run the update utility again but this time edit the
>> nv
is updated
> information.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> - Greg
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rose, Gregory V [mailto:gregory.v.r...@intel.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 4:26 PM
>> To: Stefan Priebe
>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.source
get this updated
> information.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> - Greg
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rose, Gregory V [mailto:gregory.v.r...@intel.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 4:26 PM
>> To: Stefan Priebe
>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.s
com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 4:26 PM
> To: Stefan Priebe
> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> Stefan,
>
> You will need to run the update utility again but this time edit the
> nvmupdate.cfg file to change t
Priebe [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 10:40 AM
> To: Rose, Gregory V
> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> Correct message:
> PXE-m10: The application for the device detected a newer vers
;>> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:01 AM
>>> To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> <mailto:e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> sad you ar
M
>> To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> sad you are not able to reproduce. The good thing i can't reproduce myself
>> either ;-(
>>
>> it just happen
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:01 AM
> To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> Hi,
>
> sad yo
- Profihost AG [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 12:28 AM
>> To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> could you tell me the output of ethtool -i an
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 12:28 AM
> To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> coul
-
>>>> From: Stefan Priebe [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 12:02 PM
>>>> To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>>>>
>>>>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Stefan Priebe [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 12:02 PM
> > > To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i4
27;ll get it started ASAP.
Thanks for your patience.
- Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: Rose, Gregory V [mailto:gregory.v.r...@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 1:16 PM
> To: Stefan Priebe; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] droppe
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Priebe [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 12:02 PM
> To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> Am 13.08.2015 um 20:59 schrieb Rose,
Message-
> From: Stefan Priebe [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:53 AM
> To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry for top posting.
>
> I will try to
x off rx-usecs 2 tx-usecs 0
>>>
>>> I believe that you would be better off using higher values. Really low
>> values mean the HW interrupt will fire more often - instead you should
>> allow the soft IRQ polling to keep processing packets.
>>>
>>> - Gre
stop it again by rebooting the system/server. (can't prove
>>>> it)
>>>>
>>>> Stefan
>>>> Am 06.08.2015 um 22:59 schrieb Rose, Gregory V:
>>>>> Thanks Stefan. I think for now you've given us enough data to go on
>>&
gt;> Thanks Stefan. I think for now you've given us enough data to go on
> >>> - I've got some research to do and then I'll get back to you.
> >>>
> >>> - Greg
> >>>
> >>>> -Original Message-
> >>
gt;>>
>>> - Greg
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 11:32 PM
>>>> To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>
nd then I'll get back to you.
>>
>> - Greg
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 11:32 PM
>>> To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourc
he way, have you tried using ethtool to turn adaptive RX and TX off
>> using ethtool to see if that has any impact on the dropped packets?
>>
>> I tested this one:
>> ethtool -C eth3 adaptive-rx off adaptive-tx off rx-usecs 2 tx-usecs 0
>>
>> but it has not helped. Still
ver. Just write me.
Stefan
> - Greg
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 11:32 PM
>> To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [E
2015 11:32 PM
> To: Rose, Gregory V; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
> Am 06.08.2015 um 00:22 schrieb Rose, Gregory V:
> > Stefan,
> >
> > Could you please send me the output of 'ethtool' and 'ethtool -
tefan Priebe [mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 11:14 AM
>> To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>>
>>
>> Something i've noticed:
>> ixgbe:
>> Adaptive RX: off T
5, 2015 11:14 AM
> To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] dropped rx with i40e
>
>
> Something i've noticed:
> ixgbe:
> Adaptive RX: off TX: off
> rx-usecs: 1
> tx-usecs: 0
>
> i40e:
> Adaptive RX: on TX: on
> rx-usecs: 62
Something i've noticed:
ixgbe:
Adaptive RX: off TX: off
rx-usecs: 1
tx-usecs: 0
i40e:
Adaptive RX: on TX: on
rx-usecs: 62
tx-usecs: 122
Stefan
Am 05.08.2015 um 09:02 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
> Hello list,
>
> we're using the intel X520 cards with the ixgbe driver since a long tim
41 matches
Mail list logo
