Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-26 Thread Malcolm McCallum
interest in allowing mo= ney to influence their opinons in research. I believe that has been shown w= ith the recent exposure of Exxon's interest in climate change research.=20 =20 Mark Winterstein=20 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:06:11 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:= Re: Climate change

Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-26 Thread Maiken Winter
Dave's message reminded me of a comment from a friend that I didn't take to heart, and didn't apply yet: tell people that you earn nothing by giving talks on climate change, not for any of your work. Ok, I tell you know. If anybody wonders, Al Gore's cavalry, how he called us, the climate project

Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-26 Thread Maiken Winter
Sorry, all, I shouldn't write too late or too early in the morning when my brain isn't quite turned on yet. All I wanted to say is that the discussion on the ecolog made me realize that it is important to note upfront who - if anybody - is funding work on climate change. That might help to reduce

Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-26 Thread David M. Lawrence
-Original Message- From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cherubini Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:06 PM To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Subject: Re: Climate change funding Malcolm Mccallum wrote: if PHDs' activities were

Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-25 Thread David M. Lawrence
-Original Message- From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cherubini Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:06 PM To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Subject: Re: Climate change funding Malcolm Mccallum wrote: if PHDs' activities were

FW: Climate change funding

2007-10-25 Thread David M. Lawrence
-Original Message- From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David M. Lawrence Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 1:47 AM To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Subject: Re: Climate change funding Hmmm, What about the alternative hypothesis, Cherubini

Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-25 Thread Timothy Smith
I'm not getting a damn dime of that massive amount of research money you= claim is skewing scientists' perceptions of problems, but I for the most = part tend to side with the majority consensus that certain issues, such as= climate change, habitat loss and degredation, over-exploitation of

Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-25 Thread Malcolm McCallum
@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Subject: Re: Climate change funding Malcolm Mccallum wrote: if PHDs' activities were primarily profit driven, then they would be found in corporations paying much better than the low pay (often less than 45K/yr) found at most universities upon graduation. Despite

Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-25 Thread Liane Cochran-Stafira
Brautigan -Original Message- From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cherubini Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:06 PM To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Subject: Re: Climate change funding Malcolm Mccallum wrote: if PHDs' activities

Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-25 Thread Mark Winterstein
in research. I believe that has been shown w= ith the recent exposure of Exxon's interest in climate change research.=20 =20 Mark Winterstein=20 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:06:11 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:= Re: Climate change funding To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Malcolm Mccal= lum wrote

Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-24 Thread Paul Cherubini
Malcolm Mccallum wrote: if PHDs' activities were primarily profit driven, then they would be found in corporations paying much better than the low pay (often less than 45K/yr) found at most universities upon graduation. Despite this, graduates in environmentally relevant fields seek

Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-23 Thread Maiken Winter
Hi Kelly, I don't think the article had an unbiased view on the issue of funding - to compare funding that people receive from oil and gas companies with funding that researchers receive after a peer reviewed process of research proposals is like comparing apples with oranges. Of course many

Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-23 Thread Malcolm McCallum
The problem with these financial arguements is that the basic assumption that scientists are primarily profit driven is invalid. In fact, universities found a long time ago that faculty will take a lower paying post if there is stronger institutional support for research by way of facilities and

Re: Climate change funding

2007-10-22 Thread Kelly Stettner
RE: George C. Marshall Institute funding paper With due respect, I see no problem with a scientist or private citizen calling for more research, further exploration and a clear, unbiased view of the facts in a given situation. Kelly, your scoff that the Institute didn't use any