On 30 July 2015 at 02:59, Gao, Liming liming@intel.com wrote:
Jordan:
I have verified 4K aligned image build.
Test-by: Liming Gao liming.gao@intel
Thanks Liming
Just to be clear, I assume you added something like this
diff --git a/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc b/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc
On 07/30/15 13:37, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 20:26 +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
series (up to and including 3/2)
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com
If you did this by pulling my tree, rather than manually applying
patches — which I'm fairly sure you did — then you
Hi Jordan,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:59:04PM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
But, the name 'open platform' also sounds strange, assuming this a
plain PCI bus driver. Couldn't it live in a 'pci drivers' package?
Personally, I think we should rename OptionRomPkg to DriversPkg, or
split
On 2015-07-30 11:51:56, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
Jordan,
I agree with the concept of having package(s) for device driver content.
OptionRomPkg is really only intended to provide good examples for
writing drivers, and we want to restrict what goes in there to a
good example for each driver
[...]
Sorry I was thinking more about routine maintenance (like the string n
cleanup recently), or refactoring of the code disabling the exploit
mechanism with out knowledge that the exploit exists. I guess an older
branch can get patched, but the commit history in master is not going to
On 07/28/15 18:42, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Now that GenFw correctly propagates the minimum alignment of the ELF
input sections to the PE/COFF binary, we can simply select 'auto'
alignment in the FDF Rule section instead of tweaking it by hand.
Also add the FIXED FFS attribute to the module
On 2015-07-30 15:35:58, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
Hello
Do we consider below 2 options?
-- DriversPkg/Vendor/VendorName/Bus/BusType ?
or
-- DriversPkg/Bus/BusType/Vendor/VendorName ?
Another option is that we add DriverCategory, like
GOP/UNDI/RAID/SIO. Then we can put UNDI driver together, no
Thanks for the info. That makes sense.
It is pity that there is no X64 version and SMP not work. We can make
improvement step by step.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Laszlo
Ersek
Sent: Wednesday, July 29,
Hello
Do we consider below 2 options?
-- DriversPkg/Vendor/VendorName/Bus/BusType ?
or
-- DriversPkg/Bus/BusType/Vendor/VendorName ?
Another option is that we add DriverCategory, like GOP/UNDI/RAID/SIO. Then we
can put UNDI driver together, no matter it is PCI based or USB based.
Thank you
Yao
On 31 July 2015 at 01:17, Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/27/15 15:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 27 July 2015 at 15:34, Liu, Yingke D yingke.d@intel.com wrote:
Reviewed-by: Yingke Liu yingke.d@intel.com
Thank you
Committed as SVN r18077 ... r18080
I do have another
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong eric.d...@intel.com
---
.../Application/UiApp/BootMaint/BootOption.c | 58 --
.../Application/UiApp/BootMaint/UpdatePage.c | 29 ---
MdeModulePkg/Application/UiApp/Ui.h
On Jul 30, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/15 20:54, Jordan Justen wrote:
On 2015-07-30 10:09:34, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
(Sigh, I left off the list address. This should be discussed publicly.
Resending.)
Clearly, the SMBIOS patches I posted and got
On 07/31/15 01:31, Andrew Fish wrote:
On Jul 30, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/27/15 15:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 27 July 2015 at 15:34, Liu, Yingke D yingke.d@intel.com wrote:
Reviewed-by: Yingke Liu yingke.d@intel.com
Thank you
Committed as
Daryl and Ard,
Sorry for the incorrect description. This file is new created and changed from
an old existed file, so the old copyright is error kept.
I have update the copyright info. Because this is new added file, so I only
kept the 2015 copyright.
Thanks,
Eric
-Original Message-
On 07/31/15 01:49, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 31 July 2015 at 01:17, Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/27/15 15:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 27 July 2015 at 15:34, Liu, Yingke D yingke.d@intel.com wrote:
Reviewed-by: Yingke Liu yingke.d@intel.com
Thank you
Committed as SVN
(Sigh, I left off the list address. This should be discussed publicly.
Resending.)
Clearly, the SMBIOS patches I posted and got committed last time are not
good enough. That's because the SMBIOS 3.0 entry point is structurally
different from the prior versions (because why not). Therefore, now
Bravo!
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Laszlo
Ersek
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 9:58 AM
To: Blibbet; edk2-de...@ml01.01.org
Cc: Peter Jones
Subject: Re: [edk2] today's US CERT UEFI advisory
On 07/30/15 17:49, Blibbet wrote:
The copyright information was incorrectly updated.
The correct copyright is:
Copyright (c) 2011 - 2015, Intel Corporation. All rights
reserved.BR
Previous copyrights must be maintained.
This patch should be rejected and a new one submitted with the corrected
copyright notice and subject
On 29 July 2015 at 10:59, Eric Dong eric.d...@intel.com wrote:
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong eric.d...@intel.com
The license is called 'BSD' not 'BDS'
Could you fix up the commit titles please?
--
Ard.
---
FYI, in case any OEM's missed today's US-CERT UEFI vulnerability notice:
http://firmwaresecurity.com/2015/07/30/us-cert-bios-vulnerability-note-vu577140/
Remember that any TianoCore-based bugs may be in your platorm:
https://twitter.com/XenoKovah/status/623483244890189824
Can anyone clarify if
On 7/27/2015 11:39 PM, He, Tim wrote:
Yes, these 2 typedefs is being defined twice, we need to remove the second
definition, I will check in the code patch.
Thanks. Just to check, how long is there normally between accepting the
patch and committing it? I don't see any of my recent
(resending this one too)
On 07/30/15 19:09, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
(Sigh, I left off the list address. This should be discussed publicly.
Resending.)
Clearly, the SMBIOS patches I posted and got committed last time are not
good enough. That's because the SMBIOS 3.0 entry point is structurally
On 07/30/15 20:50, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 28/07/2015 20:44, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
I have a significant update for this patch. On S3 resume, the APMC_EN
bit (and other bits) are cleared in SMI_EN (which is necessary, see qemu
commit be66680e). For the trigger method to work right after S3
On 28/07/2015 20:44, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
I have a significant update for this patch. On S3 resume, the APMC_EN
bit (and other bits) are cleared in SMI_EN (which is necessary, see qemu
commit be66680e). For the trigger method to work right after S3 resume,
the APMC_EN bit must be set again
On Jul 30, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/15 17:49, Blibbet wrote:
FYI, in case any OEM's missed today's US-CERT UEFI vulnerability notice:
http://firmwaresecurity.com/2015/07/30/us-cert-bios-vulnerability-note-vu577140/
Remember that any
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao liming@intel.com
-Original Message-
From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 9:32 AM
To: Ni, Ruiyu; Gao, Liming; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: [Patch] Remove the useless code to fix build failure caused by error
depend on IntelFrameworkModulePkg.
On 07/30/15 20:09, Andrew Fish wrote:
On Jul 30, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com
mailto:ler...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/15 17:49, Blibbet wrote:
FYI, in case any OEM's missed today's US-CERT UEFI vulnerability notice:
On 2015-07-30 10:09:34, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
(Sigh, I left off the list address. This should be discussed publicly.
Resending.)
Clearly, the SMBIOS patches I posted and got committed last time are not
good enough. That's because the SMBIOS 3.0 entry point is structurally
different from the
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng star.z...@intel.com
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Liming
Gao
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 5:40 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: [edk2] [PATCH v2] MdeModulePkg PeiCore: Add PCD to specify PEIM
On 07/29/15 23:38, Jordan Justen wrote:
On 2015-07-28 12:59:46, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Hi Jordan,
what are the rules for posting to the new list without being
subscribed?
On the old list, I think we dropped all such emails.
Currently we are rejecting them on the new list.
Paolo posted a
On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 14:38 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
On 2015-07-28 12:59:46, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Hi Jordan,
what are the rules for posting to the new list without being
subscribed?
On the old list, I think we dropped all such emails.
Currently we are rejecting them on the new
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni ruiyu...@intel.com
-Original Message-
From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 4:56 PM
To: Ni, Ruiyu ruiyu...@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: [Patch] UiApp: Move reset menu from frontpage to BMM page.
Contributed-under: TianoCore
v2 changelog:
Check CurrentPeimHandle to check the matched PeimHandle.
Add check point to ShadowPeiCore based on PCD.
v1 changelog:
PeiCore LoadImage always shadow itself and PEIM on normal boot after
the physical memory is installed. On the emulator platform, the shadow
may be not necessary. To
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong eric.d...@intel.com
---
MdeModulePkg/Application/UiApp/BootMaint/Bm.vfr | 8
MdeModulePkg/Application/UiApp/BootMaint/BootMaint.c | 4
MdeModulePkg/Application/UiApp/BootMaint/FormGuid.h | 1 +
34 matches
Mail list logo
