Supreeth,
Thank for the comment and add buffer layout description in committed code for
better readable. Thanks.
Best Regards
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Supreeth Venkatesh [mailto:supreeth.venkat...@arm.com]
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 5:25 AM
To: Jin, Eric ;
> On Mar 8, 2019, at 7:08 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> On 03/08/19 15:13, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
>> I guess the historic reason is that AP and BSP share same GDT before. As
>> such, the GDT need to be below 4G, to let AP switch from real mode to
>> protected mode.
>> We don't get issue, because
> On Mar 8, 2019, at 4:07 PM, Kinney, Michael D
> wrote:
>
> Jiewen,
>
> There are not many of those functions and they can be on speed paths.
>
> I do not recommend converting them to only NASM.
>
> I do recommend we add comments to NASM files and C files with include
> assembly that
Jiewen,
There are not many of those functions and they can be on speed paths.
I do not recommend converting them to only NASM.
I do recommend we add comments to NASM files and C files with include assembly
that state that updates to one require updates to the others.
Mike
From: Yao, Jiewen
I made some minor changes to the wiki to better emphasize the stable tag
releases.
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II
Thank you all for the work on the latest release.
---
Brian Richardson -- Director, Firmware
On 03/08/19 03:14, Rebecca Cran via edk2-devel wrote:
> The current servers listed appear to be unusable. I suspect most
> people will get correct DNS servers via DHCP, but the defaults
> should work for anyone.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Rebecca
On 02/27/19 22:21, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> The current language for "Package Reviewer" only vaguely hints that
> Package Reviewers should be able to provide guidance and directions.
> Make this more obvious.
>
> Cc: Andrew Fish
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel
> Cc: Leif Lindholm
> Cc: Liming Gao
> Cc:
Hi, all
The tag edk2-stable201903 has been created.
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/releases/tag/edk2-stable201903
git clone -b edk2-stable201903 https://github.com/tianocore/edk2.git
The tag edk2-stable201903 has been added into the main EDK II Wiki page.
On 03/08/19 16:48, Gao, Liming wrote:
> Hi, all Sorry for a little late announce. I wait for some time to
> collect the feedback on the CEV fix. There is no rejection on CVE
> fix. So, I add it to this tag release. I will create
> edk2-stable201903 based on current edk2 trunk (commit 89910a
>
Laszlo:
Thanks for your suggestion. There is no other. I have update Wiki page to
delay 12 hour for this stable tag. I have pushed this CVE fix. I will create
the stable tag quickly and send another announcement.
Thanks
Liming
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek
Laszlo:
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Notes is
designed to include the change in this stable tag. After the stable tag is
created, the contents will be moved to tag notes. This wiki will be clear.
All things in
Hi, all
Sorry for a little late announce. I wait for some time to collect the feedback
on the CEV fix. There is no rejection on CVE fix. So, I add it to this tag
release. I will create edk2-stable201903 based on current edk2 trunk (commit
89910a MdeModulePkg/HiiImage: Fix stack overflow when
Bring SgiPkg in line with EDK2 core changes to StandaloneMmPkg:
- add a resolution for ExtractGuidedSectionLib
- remove reference to gStandaloneMmPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdStandaloneMmEnable
- update the resolution of StandaloneMmDriverEntryPoint
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Bring DeveloperBox in line with EDK2 core changes to StandaloneMmPkg:
- switch from BaseExtractGuidedSectionLib to PrePiExtractGuidedSectionLib
- include a NULL library class resolution for VariableMmDependency
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel
On 03/08/19 15:30, Tian, Hot wrote:
> For this specific question from Laszlo, I do not have strong recommendation.
> Liming/Laszlo can work out a recommendation.
> But looking at https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II,
> I do have recommendation to make UDK less prominent
On 03/08/19 15:13, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> I guess the historic reason is that AP and BSP share same GDT before. As
> such, the GDT need to be below 4G, to let AP switch from real mode to
> protected mode.
> We don't get issue, because Runtime memory is in BIN, and most platform
> allocates BIN
For this specific question from Laszlo, I do not have strong recommendation.
Liming/Laszlo can work out a recommendation.
But looking at https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II, I
do have recommendation to make UDK less prominent (e.g. remove "UDK Releases"
section) as
Hot: it looks like we need to revise the wiki page so the stable tag & release
notes links are more prominent. Any recommendations on changes?
Thanks ... br
---
Brian Richardson -- Director, Firmware Ecosystem Development
brian.richard...@intel.com -- @intel_brian (Twitter & WeChat)
I guess the historic reason is that AP and BSP share same GDT before. As such,
the GDT need to be below 4G, to let AP switch from real mode to protected mode.
We don't get issue, because Runtime memory is in BIN, and most platform
allocates BIN under 4G.
Some thought:
1) I am think we not sure
I guess
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Notes is
also for future release notes. Seems it's not listed on
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II.
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On
Hi Laszlo,
You can find the permanent release notes on
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II:
Under Stable Tags session:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/releases/tag/edk2-stable201811
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Planning
is for
On 03/08/19 09:52, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/08/19 07:41, Gao, Liming wrote:
>> This is to fix the security issue. I agree it is an import bug fix. I am OK
>> to push it for edk2-stable201903 tag
>
> Me too.
>
> If we had stable *branches* (as opposed to just stable tags), then we
> wouldn't
> On 03/08/19 10:07, Wang, Jian J wrote:
> > Pushed at c2c4b919caa297fbe83f02b897c125b87eb1fd58
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jian
>
> (I didn't ignore the fixup patch, I was just busy with something else.)
>
I know you won't. Just someone was pushing me behind...
Jian
> Thanks for this!
> Laszlo
On 03/08/19 10:07, Wang, Jian J wrote:
> Pushed at c2c4b919caa297fbe83f02b897c125b87eb1fd58
>
> Regards,
> Jian
(I didn't ignore the fixup patch, I was just busy with something else.)
Thanks for this!
Laszlo
___
edk2-devel mailing list
On 03/08/19 03:14, Rebecca Cran via edk2-devel wrote:
> The current servers listed appear to be unusable. I suspect most
> people will get correct DNS servers via DHCP, but the defaults
> should work for anyone.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Rebecca
Pushed at c2c4b919caa297fbe83f02b897c125b87eb1fd58
Regards,
Jian
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Chao B
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2019 4:58 PM
> To: Wang, Jian J ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek ; Yao, Jiewen ;
> zh...@ml01.01.org
> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH]
Hi Liming,
On 03/01/19 09:57, Gao, Liming wrote:
> Hi, all
> Today, we enter into Hard Feature Freeze phase until edk2-stable201903 tag
> is created at 2019-03-08. In this phase, there is no feature to be pushed.
> The bug fix is still allowed.
I meant to ask you about permanent links to
HI Jian:
Tks for the fix.
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Jian J
Wang
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 4:56 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Laszlo Ersek ; Yao, Jiewen ;
Zhang, Chao B ;
The BOM was introduced by commit 6c05b958df532345a35b418b05effcf7fd51fc4e
accidentally.
Cc: Yao Jiewen
Cc: Zhang, Chao B
Cc: Laszlo Ersek
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang
---
Maintainers.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
HI Laszlo:
Thanks for catching this. Sorry about the inconvenience.
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Laszlo
Ersek
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 4:02 PM
To: Zhang, Chao B ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Yao, Jiewen ; Gao, Liming
Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch]
On 03/08/19 07:41, Gao, Liming wrote:
> This is to fix the security issue. I agree it is an import bug fix. I am OK
> to push it for edk2-stable201903 tag
Me too.
If we had stable *branches* (as opposed to just stable tags), then we
wouldn't have to delay the stable tag (the release) -- we'd
On 03/08/19 03:56, Zhang, Chao B wrote:
> Cc: Yao Jiewen
> Cc: Jian Wang
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Zhang, Chao B
> ---
> Maintainers.txt | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Maintainers.txt
Hi Andrew,
On 03/07/19 23:37, Andrew Fish via edk2-devel wrote:
> I'm trying to understand why gdtPtr.Base is casting to (UINT32)?
> 1) gdtPtr.Base is a a UINTN
> 2) It is legal for AllocateRuntimePool() to return an address > 4GB
>
> It seems like the code should just cast to (UINTN)?
>
>
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
