On 01/16/16 15:46, Zeng, Star wrote:
> On 2016/1/16 1:39, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 01/15/16 18:33, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>>> On 15 January 2016 at 17:05, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Hi,
snipping context liberally...
> Whilst simple text input seems to work
[...]
The above analysis is very clear, thanks. I am a little concern about if
the code changes below follow the comments in the code.
In Terminal.c:
//
// Set the timeout value of serial buffer for
// keystroke response performance issue
//
In TerminalConIn.c:
//
//
On 01/18/16 17:17, Brian J. Johnson wrote:
> On 01/18/2016 05:55 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 01/18/16 12:41, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>>> >On 18 January 2016 at 11:33, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>On 01/18/16 11:24, Zeng, Star wrote:
> >>>[...]
> >>>
>>> >
>>>
On 01/18/16 12:41, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> On 18 January 2016 at 11:33, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 01/18/16 11:24, Zeng, Star wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>
> The above analysis is very clear, thanks. I am a little concern about if
> the code changes below follow the comments
On 01/18/16 11:24, Zeng, Star wrote:
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> The above analysis is very clear, thanks. I am a little concern about if
>>> the code changes below follow the comments in the code.
>>>
>>> In Terminal.c:
>>> //
>>> // Set the timeout value of serial buffer for
>>> //
On 18 January 2016 at 11:33, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 01/18/16 11:24, Zeng, Star wrote:
>> [...]
>>
The above analysis is very clear, thanks. I am a little concern about if
the code changes below follow the comments in the code.
In Terminal.c:
On 01/18/2016 05:55 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 01/18/16 12:41, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>On 18 January 2016 at 11:33, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>On 01/18/16 11:24, Zeng, Star wrote:
>>>[...]
>>>
>
>The above analysis is very clear, thanks. I am a little concern about if
On 2016/1/18 19:33, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 01/18/16 11:24, Zeng, Star wrote:
[...]
The above analysis is very clear, thanks. I am a little concern about if
the code changes below follow the comments in the code.
In Terminal.c:
//
// Set the timeout value of serial buffer for
[...]
The above analysis is very clear, thanks. I am a little concern about if
the code changes below follow the comments in the code.
In Terminal.c:
//
// Set the timeout value of serial buffer for
// keystroke response performance issue
//
In TerminalConIn.c:
//
//
On 2016/1/16 1:39, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 01/15/16 18:33, Ryan Harkin wrote:
On 15 January 2016 at 17:05, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Hi,
snipping context liberally...
Whilst simple text input seems to work ok, cursor support does not.
And we need cursor support for Intel BDS.
On 15 January 2016 at 10:03, Zeng, Star wrote:
> On 2016/1/15 16:56, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>>
>> "
>>
>> On 15 January 2016 at 08:51, Zeng, Star wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016/1/15 16:08, Ryan Harkin wrote:
On 15 January 2016 at 06:50, Zeng, Star
Hi Star,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:03:10PM +0800, Zeng, Star wrote:
> >>>git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18378
> >>>6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
> >>>
> >>>This is because Intel BDS using cursor keys, ARM BDS does not.
> >>
> >>
> >>Sorry, I am not familiar
On 15 January 2016 at 17:05, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> snipping context liberally...
>
>> Whilst simple text input seems to work ok, cursor support does not.
>> And we need cursor support for Intel BDS.
>
> (1) I think this is important. See below.
>
>> When
On 01/15/16 18:33, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> On 15 January 2016 at 17:05, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> snipping context liberally...
>>
>>> Whilst simple text input seems to work ok, cursor support does not.
>>> And we need cursor support for Intel BDS.
>>
>> (1)
On 15 January 2016 at 18:05, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> snipping context liberally...
>
>> Whilst simple text input seems to work ok, cursor support does not.
>> And we need cursor support for Intel BDS.
>
> (1) I think this is important. See below.
>
>> When
On 15 January 2016 at 18:32, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 01/15/16 18:59, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>> On 15 January 2016 at 17:39, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 01/15/16 18:33, Ryan Harkin wrote:
On 15 January 2016 at 17:05, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> On Jan 15, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>
> On 15 January 2016 at 18:32, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 01/15/16 18:59, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>>> On 15 January 2016 at 17:39, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 01/15/16 18:33, Ryan
On 01/15/16 18:59, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> On 15 January 2016 at 17:39, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 01/15/16 18:33, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>>> On 15 January 2016 at 17:05, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Ryan, can you please test the following patch?
> diff --git
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:05:03PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> snipping context liberally...
Snipping clear and very detailed (and useful) explanation.
> (4) My opinion:
>
> - The new driver's ReceiveFifoDepth setting, on init and on Reset, is
> correct. (Conforms to the spec.)
>
> - The
On 2016/1/15 16:08, Ryan Harkin wrote:
On 15 January 2016 at 06:50, Zeng, Star wrote:
On 2016/1/15 14:36, Ryan Harkin wrote:
On 15 Jan 2016 01:41, "Zeng, Star" wrote:
Hi Ryan,
On 2016/1/15 3:10, Ryan Harkin wrote:
Hi Star,
This patch breaks
"
On 15 January 2016 at 08:51, Zeng, Star wrote:
> On 2016/1/15 16:08, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>>
>> On 15 January 2016 at 06:50, Zeng, Star wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016/1/15 14:36, Ryan Harkin wrote:
On 15 Jan 2016 01:41, "Zeng, Star"
On 2016/1/15 16:56, Ryan Harkin wrote:
"
On 15 January 2016 at 08:51, Zeng, Star wrote:
On 2016/1/15 16:08, Ryan Harkin wrote:
On 15 January 2016 at 06:50, Zeng, Star wrote:
On 2016/1/15 14:36, Ryan Harkin wrote:
On 15 Jan 2016 01:41, "Zeng,
Hi Ryan,
On 2016/1/15 3:10, Ryan Harkin wrote:
Hi Star,
This patch breaks the serial terminal for ARM FVP and Juno platforms.
I assume it also breaks TC2 and other such "vexpress" platforms
effected by this change.
Whilst simple text input seems to work ok, cursor support does not.
And we
Hi Star,
This patch breaks the serial terminal for ARM FVP and Juno platforms.
I assume it also breaks TC2 and other such "vexpress" platforms
effected by this change.
Whilst simple text input seems to work ok, cursor support does not.
And we need cursor support for Intel BDS.
Below is my hack
On 15 Jan 2016 01:41, "Zeng, Star" wrote:
>
> Hi Ryan,
>
>
> On 2016/1/15 3:10, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Star,
>>
>> This patch breaks the serial terminal for ARM FVP and Juno platforms.
>> I assume it also breaks TC2 and other such "vexpress" platforms
>> effected by this
On 2016/1/15 14:36, Ryan Harkin wrote:
On 15 Jan 2016 01:41, "Zeng, Star" wrote:
Hi Ryan,
On 2016/1/15 3:10, Ryan Harkin wrote:
Hi Star,
This patch breaks the serial terminal for ARM FVP and Juno platforms.
I assume it also breaks TC2 and other such "vexpress"
It is also to integrate PL011SerialPortExtLib to PL011SerialPortLib.
Cc: Michael D Kinney
Cc: Liming Gao
Cc: Leif Lindholm
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution
27 matches
Mail list logo