On 10/13/16 03:29, GN Keshava wrote:
> Thanks Laszlo.
>
> Is it possible to run RM (or any shell command) from my C application
> code? Something like "System()" in Linux? Whether we can use LoadImage
> for this purpose?
Can't say for sure; I'd opt for a separate implementation.
Thanks
Laszlo
>
Got it. Thanks for the help, Laszlo.
Regards,
Keshava
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 at 14:03 Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/13/16 03:29, GN Keshava wrote:
> > Thanks Laszlo.
> >
> > Is it possible to run RM (or any shell command) from my C application
> > code? Something like "System()" in Linux? Whether we
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni
>-Original Message-
>From: Thomas Palmer [mailto:thomas.pal...@hpe.com]
>Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 4:30 AM
>To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>Cc: Ni, Ruiyu ; joseph.shiffl...@hpe.com; Thomas Palmer
>
>Subject: [PATCH] Nt32Pkg/WinNtBusDriverDxe: Fix small memory o
On 10/13/16 05:40, Anbazhagan, Baraneedharan wrote:
> Whether TPL needs to be raised before setting CommunicationBuffer and
> BufferSize in gSmmCorePrivate to avoid a callback overwriting those
> values before triggering SW SMI?
I don't think so. The contents of the communication buffer is untrust
This patch add the support for Pcd value to use expression in the DEC file.
Cc: Liming Gao
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu
---
BaseTools/Source/Python/Common/Misc.py | 57 --
.../Source/Python/Workspace/MetaFile
This patch updates PatchCheck.py：
1.Update max line length to 70 that describe in wiki
2.remove the two [] when do the char count calculation
3.report error for EFI_D_* macro if it is used, recommend to use
DEBUG_* format.
Cc: Liming Gao
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Sig
On 13/10/2016 11:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> Instead, once the first CPU enters SMM, it brings all the other CPUs
> into SMM as well, where they will be executing known, secure code --
> i.e., the first CPU to enter SMM forces the other CPUs to temporarily
> abandon any (possibly malicious) code
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> Bonzini
>
> On 13/10/2016 11:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >
> > Instead, once the first CPU enters SMM, it brings all the other CPUs
> > into SMM as well, where they will be executing known, secure code --
> > i.e., the firs
Hi everyone
I'm trying to send a command to a SAS (serial attached scsi) storage device
to retrieve some SMART information, but I'm facing some problems that maybe
you can give me some light.
During a research about how does the SAS devices work I faced this
specification: http://www.t10.org/memb
In EfiShellGetGuidFromName (ShellProtocol.c), we see:
EfiShellGetGuidFromName(
IN CONST CHAR16 *GuidName,
OUT EFI_GUID *Guid
)
{
EFI_GUID*NewGuid;
EFI_STATUS Status;
if (Guid == NULL || GuidName == NULL) {
return (EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER);
}
Status = GetGuidFromSt
In using AsciiPrint (I'm presuming the behavior is also in Print, but I haven't
tested), I found an interesting behavior for linefeed characters embedded in
strings that are parameters. I post it here just so people who are mystified by
their output can understand it.
Consider this example:
CO
I think there are a couple of assumptions here that should be reconsidered...
First, it is not always the case that entry into SMM on one CPU will always
pull all CPUs into SMM. There are methods to deliver targeted SMIs via the
local APIC on some processors. In addition, I have 2nd hand knowl
Tim:
The first parameter in AsciiPrint() is the Format string. Per PrintLib.h
definition, \n will be changed to \r\n in the format string.
The following end of line(EOL) translations must be performed on the contents
of the format string:
- '\\r' is translated to '\\r'
- '\\r\\n' is
Please remove the ending back-slash in following lines. They are not needed.
+ while (MaxSize >= sizeof (EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL) && \
+(MaxSize - sizeof (EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL) >= Size) && \
+!IsDevicePathEnd (DevicePath)) {
With the above changes, Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni
>--
Liming --
And I agree that this should be the behavior. I was surprised by the lack of
translation for the other string printed via %s.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Gao, Liming [mailto:liming@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:24 PM
To: Tim Lewis ; edk2-devel-01
Subject
Reviewed-by: Fu Siyuan
> -Original Message-
> From: Ye, Ting
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 1:59 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Subramanian; Sriram ; Fu, Siyuan
> ; Zhang, Lubo
> Subject: [Patch] NetworkPkg: Record user configured TargetIP/Port in iBFT
>
> Current ISCSI d
Reviewed-by: jiewen@intel.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Mudusuru, Giri P
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 10:11 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Yao, Jiewen ; Kinney, Michael D
>
> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] IntelSiliconPkg: Add Intel Firmware Version Info (FVI)
> definitions
Shouldn't
+#include SmBios.h
be
+#include
?
Thanks,
Star
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Giri P
Mudusuru
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 10:11 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Kinney, Michael D ; Yao, Jiewen
Subject: [edk2] [
Yes Star thanks for catching the merge issue. Will fix it before check-in.
Thanks,
-Giri
> -Original Message-
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 9:25 PM
> To: Mudusuru, Giri P ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D ; Yao, Jiewen
> ; Zeng, Star
> Subject: RE:
This patch is mainly to:
1. Enhance the error handling codes when set variable fail.
2. Enhance the logic to fix some incorrect UI behaviors.
V2: Update the Console/Terminal menu when the related question changed.
Cc: Liming Gao
Cc: Eric Dong
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement
According to RFC 3720, the TargetAddress provided in a redirection
might be a DNS host name, a dotted-decimal IPv4 address, or a
bracketed IPv6 address. Current ISCSI driver in Networkpkg only
supports dotted-decimal IPv4 address, so we need add IPv6 address
support since it is a combo driver suppo
Remove extra qword in nasm code to make it pass build.
This file is only built in INTEL ICC compiler. So, there is missing
build check for it.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao
---
.../BaseSynchronizationLib/Ia32/InterlockedCompareExchange64.nasm
There may be an error happens when we use the
configure function to set or change the configuration
data for the DNS6 instance, So we will free the
DnsServerList without configured to NULL. If we reset
the instance with the parameter DnsConfigData to NULL, the
DnsServerList will be freed twice.
Co
23 matches
Mail list logo
