On 6/29/07, Ian Stirling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish people would understand that hitting reply on a message
in order to pick up the list address is not the correct way to start
a new thread.
Hitting reply here addresses the reply to the sender of the posting
I'm replying to, not the
If it doesn't hurry up and get here, I reckon I'm going to have lost too
many brain cells to use it. HiHi
Waiting, waiting, waiting .
On 29/6/07 09:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
I reckon my K3 is going to be the most intelligent thing in my shack.
--
Dear God, Did you
And could I ask that you use [OT] for an off topic post.
Not having any Elecraft kit yet and waiting for my K3, I am reading other
mails, sometimes the K2 stuff is of value to me (it's always of great value
to someone), but not often and I can always search the archive.
On 29/6/07 09:05, [EMAIL
On 29 Jun 2007 at 4:05, G4ILO wrote:
Hitting reply here addresses the reply to the sender of the posting
I'm replying to, not the list, which is a real pain as I'm getting too
old and stupid to always remember to change the recipient to
elecraft@mailman.qth.net before hitting send.
And those
I thought you could transmit via the currently chosen filter - have I missed
something?
On 29/6/07 09:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Is 2.1kHz really overly narrow for SSB transmit? I know people are
talking about 1.8kHz filters for RX, and it seems useless to transmit
energy
Norma, patience is a virtue. Just get on the air and make some Qs whilst
you are waiting!
Chris G3SJJ
David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:
If it doesn't hurry up and get here, I reckon I'm going to have lost too
many brain cells to use it. HiHi
Waiting, waiting, waiting .
On 29/6/07 09:05,
You're all worse than a 5 year-old child waiting for Santa.
Maybe we could send Wayne and Eric some 'hurry up' pills?
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
- Original Message -
From: G3SJJ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Norma, patience is a virtue. Just get on the air and make some Qs whilst
you are waiting!
In a message dated 6/28/07 11:27:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's a very recent term as Ham-speak goes, originating in QST in 1971
according to this source:
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/club/mentor/
I remember when that article came out.I wasn't a new
Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:
You're all worse than a 5 year-old child waiting for Santa.
Maybe we could send Wayne and Eric some 'hurry up' pills?
how about a prerequisite
that all perspective K3 owners
be mandated that they begin
a regiment of 4 chill_pills a day
for at least a month
B4
they
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Sam Morgan wrote:
Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:
You're all worse than a 5 year-old child waiting for Santa.
Maybe we could send Wayne and Eric some 'hurry up' pills?
how about a prerequisite
that all perspective K3 owners
be mandated that they begin
a regiment of 4
Gil,
Actually things may not be all that bad and you may find that the only
components damaged are the KPA100 firmware chip and KPA100 U6.
However, you should be prepared with all the parts that Gary listed just
in case.
Reversing the color sequence would have placed 12 volts on the KPA100
Eric, I'm glad I saw this KAT100 thread. I wanted to ask if the KAT100 will
tune ok on 6m. I looked through the specs and the rest of the manual and could
only find reference to 160 through 10. The specs did not include a frequency
coverage range.
Stan Rife
W5EWA
Eric Swartz -
Didn't someone physically attach a KAT100 to the bottom of a K2 a while back.
Seems like I saw something about that on the reflector. It made it look like
one big cabinet.
Stan Rife
W5EWA
Don Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott,
If you have the KIO2 installed then you must
Don, I found your answer on the setting of R1 in the last reply of interest to
me. I'm buiding K2 #6100 and when I got to that part of the build process was
unable to get 3.80: my dmm reads 3.76 but only at the extreme end of R1's
range.
At first, I didn't think much of it and have
Gary:
I've had the AF1 audio filter for several months now, using it with my trusty
ol'
ICOM 735, and am very happy with it. I operate mainly CW (haven't tried it
with SSB). It enables me to hear many a weak signal that would otherwise
be buried in noise. Only negative (for me) is that it
Thanks for the input, Terry! I operate mainly CW also but, I also operate SSB
a little. I have an Autek Q1-FA audio filter and it works fine but, the K2
doesn't have enough mojo for my external speaker. I noticed that the AF1 has
a built in amp so I'm hoping that will work.
Gary, N7HTS
OK,
I've had this problem since joining the reflector.
I just sent a test message to:
elecraft@mailman.qth.net
The message was promptly returned to my inbox with the following notation:
QUOTE
A message (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) was received at 29 Jun 2007 15:11:03
+.
The following
On Friday 29 June 2007 03:29:18 Julian G4ILO wrote:
Hitting reply here addresses the reply to the sender of the posting
I'm replying to, not the list, which is a real pain as I'm getting too
old and stupid to always remember to change the recipient to
elecraft@mailman.qth.net before hitting
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
Or leave some milk cookies by the front door for the UPS / FedEx / Postman...
73,
Tom N0SS
At 04:08 06/29/2007, Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:
You're all worse than a 5 year-old child waiting for Santa.
Maybe we could send Wayne and Eric some 'hurry up' pills?
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
-
Hi Stan,
I believe the KAT100 is only specified for use with the K2 through 10M.
(The K3's internal ATU -does- work on 6M.)
73, Eric
Stan Rife wrote:
Eric, I'm glad I saw this KAT100 thread. I wanted to ask if the KAT100 will
tune ok on 6m. I looked through the specs and the rest of the
This test is in plain text from kj3d.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
Well, Well...
That did it! I thought all my email was in text, but apparently not.
Thanks,
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Dave Van Wallaghen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 11:34 AM
To: 'KJ3D'
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] posting style
Tom,
Not sure if this is the
On 6/29/07, Ian Stirling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not have a reply-to field in my headers,
so I suspect strongly that the destination of your
reply is determined by your email software setting,
nothing to do with my settings. Supporting this
notion, when I reply to my own posting, the
Is W9BRD a silent key now? I QSOed him a couple of years ago several times
on 30 meters. Nice fellow.
I 'wonder if Elmer might have been derived from the author Elmer E.
Bucher who worked for RCA and wrote several books during the early 20's in
the spark era?
73,
Sandy W5TVW
-
Thank you, seeing as one of those is mine, I'll encourage you to get on with
the production :-)
On 29/6/07 16:48, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Hi David,
I'll clarify. We specify globally in the K3 set up menu which filter is
transmitted through for -each- mode.
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 17:05 +0100, Julian G4ILO wrote:
The only way I can get a reply to go to the list is to select Reply
All, which is hidden in a menu.
That's gmail's fault for not providing a reply to list option. You
could send them a feature request (I believe there is an online form for
WA6HHQ:
This is incorrect. The 2.7 kHz 5-pole can only be swapped for a 2.8 kHz
or possibly the 2.1 kHz 8 pole filters. We require at least one SSB b/w
filter in each K3 as it ships since we must also transmit through the
filter for SSB and data modes. Transmitting through the 2.1 kHz filter
Is 2.1kHz really overly narrow for SSB transmit? I know people are
talking about 1.8kHz filters for RX, and it seems useless to transmit
energy that's not going to be used. It's certainly wide enough for
data modes. In fact, it might be useful to be able to TX through the
400Hz filter in
My ISP changed from Alltel to Windstream.
My ISP recognises 'me'@alltel or 'me'@windstream, both outgoing and incoming
as equivalent.
When I registered for the Elecraft reflector, I used 'me'@windstream.
The Elecraft reflector will reject reply postings from 'me'@alltel although
that is the
I'm looking for the instructions / schematic for Don Brown's solar
charge controller.
I'm getting ready for the forth , and want to put it in a metal
box , but not certain of the heat sink's groundability.
anyone point me in the right direction , email me the schematic/
instruction
In my opinion 2,1 khz isn't to narrow , but it would be desireable to be
able to go 2,4 or 2,7 for ragchewing.
Have you ever tried to narrow down a ESSB signal on the reciever side?
You lose talkpower and the signal sounds lousy.
Do the same with a signal transmitting standard BW will still get
Interesting, although I have to take into account the fact that the
publisher of the report has a vested interest in showing that more
bandwidth is appreciably better for voice communication.
73, doug
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:09:34 -0400
From: DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to all of you who responded to my post about the K2 top cover. It is
spoken for.
Steve Banks
K0PQ
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Thanks for the tip, Don.
Regards,
Dick - KA5KKT/4
-Original Message-
From: Don Wilhelm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---snip---
Dick (and all),
The solution to that situation is to subscribe with both addresses - just
set 'no mail' (or whatever the equal is) on one address so you do not
At 12:09 PM 2007-06-29, DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL KR2Q wrote:
http://www.polycom.com/common/documents/whitepapers/effect_of_bandwidth_on_speech_intelligibility_2.pdf
Don't confuse single single intelligibility of speech (and especially
speech quality) with speech intelligibility during heavy band qrm.
Just finished final assemby today. The receiver is
the best I've ever had. Very impressive kit and
performance. No glitches (caught a couple of my own
mistakes). Most frustrating time - put one thermal
pad on Q7 and went to put the other on Q8 and couldn't
find it. Searched through the trash
How well does the K2 work in RTTY mode? I presume it is AFSK only? I
seem to recall that some do not recommend the K2 for serious RTTY
operating but I don't remember the reasoning behind this. I vaguely
recall reading this about 2 years ago from somewhere.
I'm a RTTY operator first then SSB.
Also, any AOL users who don't already know, the default reply mode is HTML.
To defeat this and reply in plain text, right click the mouse cursor in the
text window (but not on the text) and select the menu item at bottom of list
Compose in Plain Text. Works for v9.x, haven't tried older
JT,
There is nothing wrong with AFSK - in fact, if the carrier balance on
the KSB2 board is adjusted correctly, AFSK is indistinguishable from FSK.
The only 'problem' with the K2 is that the BFO range is limited, with
the result that narrow filters cannot be set with a center frequency
The term may have been 'officialized' by the article, but I remember K6MJX
offering to be my 'Elmer' when I was 14 years old in 1958. I asked him then
where the term came from and he said he didn't know - it was like Ham which
had
fuzzy origins. The term was in usage here and there well
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:55:38 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The term may have been 'officialized' by the article, but I
remember K6MJX offering to be my 'Elmer' when I was 14 years old
in 1958. I asked him then where the term came from and he said he
didn't know - it was like Ham which had fuzzy
42 matches
Mail list logo
