Alan,
Thanks for your reply. Your approach would provide 40m capability to replace
the 40m capability that my (Sommer) beam loses through detuning.
However, I wonder how hard your tuner must work on 40? Enough to create
substantial feedline losses when the tuner is in the shack?
Anyway, I have
Of course. beginning with the K2, all Elecraft rigs have a delay built
in -- that is, TX begins 8 msec or more after the amp control line is
keyed. On the K3 and later relays, the delay is adjustable. 8 msec is
enough for most amps with GOOD relays (vacuum relays), but not enough
for slower
I use two of the top guy wires as an inverted vee. There are insulators
near the top of the guys and about 50 feet or so down. The vee is
brought to resonance on 80 meters with a center-tapped loading coil,
which also acts as a balun. The best match was with the coax tapped
right about at
Years ago, after putting up a heavy-duty crank-up tower with several
antennas on a tall mast at the top, I was interested in loading up the whole
metal tree for 160 and/or 80. However, I didn't like the prospect of
transmitted power getting back into the shack via the existing feedlines,
causing
On Sun,2/26/2017 3:04 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
> But even though the K3 is cycling TX/RX very fast the 8410 is not
banging
> the vacuum relay to death trying to follow 30 wpm dits. 30 wpm
QSK*does*
> significantly shorten relay time to failure. Contesting, I've worn some
out
> in less than a
One characteristic of a "T", assuming the top wires run in opposite directions
and are of equal length, is that radiation from the top wires is highly
suppressed because they are fed "in phase" by the vertical section. That means
that nearly all radiation is from the vertical section, whereas
Just thought I'd drop a note on my experience using my KX3/PX3 setup for the
CQ-160 contest this past weekend.
I operated this contest last year using a 100W radio but decided to try QRP
this year. I'm fortunate to be able to use an insulated AM broadcast tower
(220' w/120 ground radials) and
I am unable to select 10 Mhz for an IF for transverter use only selections are
7,14,21, or 28
10 Mhz is enabled (can you disable a band on the K2) and works as a regular
band.
From: Don Wilhelm
To: Harry Yingst ; Elecraft Reflector
Harry,
Do you have 10MHz mapped out for the band selection process?
73,
Don W3FPR
On 2/28/2017 6:16 PM, Harry Yingst via Elecraft wrote:
As per the K60XV Assembly and Operating Instructions Page 18 "The IF field can be
set to 7, 10, 14, 21, or 28 MHz."
When I go to set the IF the options
I am not certain what it has to do with "mush", but it does seem to help.
What is certain is that if the AGC Threshold is set too low, the AGC
will be activated on band noise. Whether that 'band noise' is the
result of ambient noise level, or the ambient 'noise' of a multitude of
signals in
KX3 has been SOLD.
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Phil Hystad
> Subject: KX3 + 2M For Sale -- Update
> Date: February 28, 2017 at 9:31:21 AM PST
> To: Elecraft Reflector Reflector
>
> I am selling my KX3 which includes the 2-meter option. Full
My thoughts on this are that those who are concerned about the slope
and threshold settings are barking up the wrong tree. The mush would
result if you have your hold time or hang time or decay set too short.
With a brief hold time the weaker signal pops up to the level of the
stronger on as
As per the K60XV Assembly and Operating Instructions Page 18 "The IF field can
be set to 7, 10, 14, 21, or 28 MHz."
When I go to set the IF the options are only 7, 14, 21, or 28 MHz. The 10 MHz
option is not available.
I'm running the latest firmware v1.09 on the K2 and v1.02 on the K60XV
The Elecraft KPA500 silent QSK is achieved without expensive PIN diodes but
rather with relatively inexpensive switching diodes. I’ll guess that the 1500
watt Elecraft prototype amp of some years ago used a similar inexpensive,
silent design.
Avoiding QSK should be because of operator
QRZ appears to be back up now. With improved spiel Czech too!
Rick nhc
On 2/28/2017 12:51 PM, Mike Flowers wrote:
Apparently, their spell checker is down too ...
" expriencing"
- 73 and good DX de Mike, K6MKF, IDXC 2017 Committee
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft
The RSP1 has been spoken for.
W0EB
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Hi Chuck,
In general, with lousy ground, horizontally polarized antennas RULE!
The earth interacts with verticals in two ways. First, the soil under
the vertical is a big resistor, burning TX power. Second, where the
first reflection hits the earth (in the far field) reinforces the direct
I'd like to sell my SDR Play RSP1 SDR monitor receiver. It's barely
used. Originally sold for $149.95 and currently selling on Ham Radio
Outlet for $129.95. It normally does not come with the USB A-B cable,
has an SMA antenna connector and there are a number of different, free,
downloadable
I too have come to that same surmise, Wes, and I hope whoever explains
it [someone always does] does so on the reflector so I can benefit too.
One of my K3's two AGC systems is highly configurable. I finally found
a threshold and fairly flat slope that, for my compromised hearing works
very
More here
http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-amazon-service-outage-20170228-story.html
On 2/28/17 12:45 PM, Roger D Johnson wrote:
I just tried and got this message:
We are expriencing issues with our Cloud Storage
provider, Please be patient while they work to
resolve
I must confess to some bewilderment about the seemingly endless discussion about
the adjustment, or mis-adjustment, of AGC slope, threshold or "RF" gain.
Claims are made that one's favorite settings cause signals within the passband
to retain their relative amplitudes thus allowing the
Apparently, their spell checker is down too ...
" expriencing"
- 73 and good DX de Mike, K6MKF, IDXC 2017 Committee
> -Original Message-
> From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
Roger
> D Johnson
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 12:46 PM
> To:
So... if I am planning to move to the high desert of New Mexico in a few
years, what is the best low-band antenna option? I've used verticals over
lots of radials in Massachusetts and Mississippi with good success, but if
I'm up 6500 feet and the water table is WAY down there... what, a dipole?
I just tried and got this message:
We are expriencing issues with our Cloud Storage provider, Please be patient
while they work to resolve the problem. In the meantime some parts of QRZ may
not be available or may be slow to respond.
On 2/28/2017 3:00 PM, Ken G Kopp wrote:
Has anyone
On 2017-02-28 03:13 PM, Tom Parish wrote:
I think there is a major Amazon (AWS) cloud computing infrastructure issue
[snip]
We continue to experience high error rates with S3 in US-East-1, which is
impacting some other AWS services.
It might be related to any sites using S3 that also sell
Just noticed a headline on the Yahoo! Finance section:
"Here's why a chunk of the Internet just got messed up"
and it points the finger at Amazon's "Simple Storage Service" (S3),which is
part of Amazon Web Services. Problem seems to primarilyon the East Coast of the
US.
73,
Bayard R. "Brandy"
Concurring with Tom, assuming you have the polarity of the X correct, and
there's more.
A short 1/4 wave-ish vertical that shows R=57 in the R+jX expression is a
vertical/counterpoise or radial(s) combo that has far too much resistance
and is a dead giveaway for a considerably inefficient antenna
I think there is a major Amazon (AWS) cloud computing infrastructure issue
going on today that is causing slow downs with a number of websites. So if
QRZ.com is dependent in any way with that infrastructure they will be
experiencing a slow down. It's impacts a lot of us ...
From their Twitter
There is a general slowdown on the Internet caused by something with Amazon
Web Services.
Google is your friend.
jim ab3cv
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Matt Zilmer wrote:
> Do NOT load javascript!
>
> z
>
>
> On 2/28/2017 12:00 PM, Ken G Kopp wrote:
>
>> Has anyone
That may answer your question:
"We are expriencing issues with our Cloud Storage provider, Please be patient
while they work to resolve the problem. In the meantime some parts of QRZ may
not be available or may be slow to respond."
73, Heinz HB9BCB
> Am 28.02.2017 um 21:07 schrieb Ken G Kopp
Do NOT load javascript!
z
On 2/28/2017 12:00 PM, Ken G Kopp wrote:
Has anyone noted anything "odd" about logging onto QRZ.com today?
It's -very- slow and when I do get on it want's me to load JavaScript.
Have never had to do this.
Please try and see if the site is operating normally, or
Whew! Thanks all ... I'm pretty careful when on the Internet, but
didn't know if I'd picked up something
73
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Mike Flowers
wrote:
> From site:
>
> " We are expriencing issues with our Cloud Storage provider, Please be
> patient while
I'm noticing severe delays on some sites, I've now added QRZ to that
list. I did not do a traceroute, but I would guess that a major hub is
offline, so give it a few hours to either come back up or the network
will readjust. That takes time to propagate the new paths.
Rick nhc
On
Has anyone noted anything "odd" about logging onto QRZ.com today?
It's -very- slow and when I do get on it want's me to load JavaScript.
Have never had to do this.
Please try and see if the site is operating normally, or have they been
hijacked?
BTW, all other sites involving logging it work OK
Aren't PIN diodes still a high power 'pipe dream' for ham applications?? Alpha
had only limited success with PIN switching, not because the diodes could not
switch at high speeds with power, but way too many hams would test their
antenna system with bad SWR, or tune their amp into a load with
Thanks, Jim. I will get into your tutorials as I continue to absorb and learn
from this discussion.
A number of people responded, both on the reflector and directly, with
observations similar to yours in at least one important respect – namely, the
quality of the ground really matters to the
Because?
Have a great day!
Bill J
K9YEQ
From: Elecraft on behalf of Wes Stewart
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:37:13 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 80 Meter Verticals
Ted,
Ted,
You need to read W7XC's (SK) article in QST Mar 1990, pp 26-30
On 2/27/2017 4:13 PM, Dauer, Edward wrote:
A question that’s admittedly a bit OT – though if I need a pretext, the rig to
be used is a K3 . . .
I have been reading through the usual texts about vertical antennas for 80
I am selling my KX3 which includes the 2-meter option. Full complement of
options and features include:
— KX3 160-6M Transceiver (Serial number #2148)
— KXAT3 Internal wide range 20-watt automatic tuner
— KXBC3 Internal NiMH Charger with Real-time Clock
— KXFL3 Dual-Passband Roofing Filter
—
Right now, my vintage K3 is back at Elecraft for major upgrades,
including a second receiver. I'm enjoying operating the KX2 in the
meantime. In fact, it was the dual watch feature of the KX2 that
clearly demonstrated to me the benefits of a second receiver in working
the DX pileups.
On
I gave up on full QSK several years ago when I started using an active
receive antenna and a DXE phase controller. Could not put all that
stuff inside the keying loop of my Ten Tec Centurion. After the second
failure of the Centurion QSK board and associated parts, I switched to a
simple and
For years with slower keying rigs I would key the amp which would key the
rig. This saved relays.
When Kenwood came out with the TS-930. 940 etc. they had very nice QSK. But
it was best to use a Mosfet or something to key the amp rather than the
internal rig's relay which was too slow.
I used to
Hi Barry,
I have the same problem as you describe.
Did you find a solution?
Best 73,
Per-Tore
LA7NO
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-O-Mini-Remote-Rig-Configuration-for-Heil-Headset-tp7596322p7627472.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive
Fred,
If your inverted 'L' was a bit less than a quarter wave long, it would have
been capacitive and showing 57-j130 (not plus). In which case you needed a
small inductor to match it to your 50 ohm coax, not a capacitor.
73,
Tom G3OLB
I have sat down at a 7300 and it is true that the front end has little
filtering. Additionally, If you have a loud station on CW with in 500hz of
the station you are trying to work, who is weak, the front in will be
de-sensed and the AGC will pump and your QSO will be over. Like most SDR
radios
What do you want to do with the radio?...for contesting K3/K3s is as good as it
gets, so far. And how was this done? By improving an already good radio. I
think it is most cool to be able to bring k3 up to K3s performance for about
$420 (synthesizer and preamp boards) and not buy a k3s.
K3s
One good reason is because a "pre-owned" IC-1300 can be found for about a
half or a third of what a similar K3 will cost.
Charlie k3ICH
Bill:
Why don't you just get a bare bones used K3. Since it will be a backup rig
why go and spend the extra $$ for a new rig. By having a second K3, you
won't
Bill,
I could learn from this wisdom. Socrates is amongst us. Some of the
information though was good especially for someone just getting a start.
There are some pretty nice radios out there for low budget not to mention a
used bare bones K3.
73 Doug EI2CN
-Original
If that local ham is sufficiently local, why not take your KX3 to his
location and connect it to his antenna to see if your KX3 is working
properly.
The Buddipole is not the most efficient antenna and may be the cause of
not hearing any signals. The SWR only says it is tuned, but that says
I just had to replace one in my TL922 after about 5 years. I'm not a contester,
but sometimes I bang away in pileups for a while. I have finally taught myself
not to use QSK unless I need it. Setting the delay in the K3 to just enough to
keep the relays closed between CW elements is almost as
Theoretically the more top loading you have, the higher the radiation
resistance and the better the efficiency. So I like the T better than the L.
I used to have an open wire fed doublet which could be switched to T
configuration. It was very helpful to switch between horizontal and vertical
I received a load of interesting and solid replies regarding my query
about the IC-7300. Many were quite technical and some were excellent
from a daily use perspective. However, without a doubt, the
non-technical advice regarding a backup rig was the best I received.
" . put the money
Bill:
Why don't you just get a bare bones used K3. Since it will be a backup
rig why go and spend the extra $$ for a new rig. By having a second K3,
you won't have to learn a new rig etc.
--
*73 De Mike*
*VE3YF
_/http://www.ve3yf.com/_*
Hey everyone, I'm trying to get back into digital modes and got out my KX3.
I have it hooked up to a buddipole antenna, and the tuner is getting a 1:1 swr,
but for some reason I'm not hearing or picking up any signals.
All I'm getting is static. One time on Sunday I picked up a psk exchange
54 matches
Mail list logo