The titles are not sufficiently accurate enough to reliably sort. Hence,
I do not get either by email. Rather, I look at the reflector online and
pick and choose what interests me.
Works for me and there are no special skills or effort required.
Bill W2BLC
--
IN GOD I TRUST (but, NOT a single
Just about all of the sorters allow you to specify criteria that include
CONTENT of the email. That's what does it for me in a lot of these, e.g.
If title contains KPA500 OR text contains KPA500 then x. But the
other thing is to read it in the Nabble gizmo at
how about seperate reflectors for k2, k3, p3??? this single one is getting out
of control in length
If you don't change direction you'll arrive where you're headed!Sent from my
iPad
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
I don't favor this suggestion at all. As long as people are somewhat
careful about the content of the subject line, there is no problem (as
far as I can see). When a particular thread becomes tedious (vide KX3,
delivery times, etc.) it is straightforward enough to simply bypass
these
*Filters even on gmail work to reduce the load..:-)
Separate reflectors would self defeating for Elecraft as they monitor and
respond to two already and to make more would increase their workload to a
point many posts would not see a reply perhaps?
Gary
*
On 20 May 2012 20:03, Ussvdharma
This gets brought up from time to time by those who want everything in the
mail list to be only something they want to read. For those who really
want to do that, every mail program, including major web mail clients like
Google's, has a sorting mechanism to put things in different folders, or
Did'nt we all agree somewhere in the very past to start our device
specific messages with that specific device in the subject directly
after the [Elecraft] signature?
I have created filters in Thunderbird that routes all [Elecraft] mail to
an Elecraft folder and all device specific to a
You are correct.
It's a list rule that gets ignored by the lazy among us.
I have my Thunderbird filters setup just like you do. It works
beautifully om properly formated emails.
Maybe we can get Eric to tweak the mail serve software to automatically
dump any email without a properly formated
Hi Kevin,
Well, no need I think.
Anyone that understands filtering can create filters that simply dump
anything out of scope on a list. Apart from that, selecting a set of
mails and delete the selection is also not much work once you have all
wanted filtering in place.
73,
Peter PA0PJE
Op
Nope, I like them all in one reflector. Would love that the KX3 traffic
move back here. 73, tom n4zpt
On 5/20/2012 6:03 AM, Ussvdharma wrote:
how about seperate reflectors for k2, k3, p3??? this single one is getting
out of control in length
So, you want a separate reflector for each Elecraft product. That would be K1,
K2, K3, P3, KPA500, KX1, KX3, KAT500, and then there are the myriad other
little products too. And, the list keeps growing (hopefully).
And, what if I have a question regarding the K3 and the P3 -- would I post to
It would be very helpful if people could remember to put K1: K2: K3:
P3: KPA500 etc at the front of the post. I am as guilty as anyone
about forgetting this.
Mike W0MU
W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net:23 or w0mu-1.dnsdynamic.com
Http://www.w0mu.com
On 5/20/2012 8:12 AM, Phil Hystad wrote:
AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] reflectors
Did'nt we all agree somewhere in the very past to start our device specific
messages with that specific device in the subject directly after the [Elecraft]
signature?
I have created filters in Thunderbird that routes all [Elecraft] mail to an
Elecraft
how about seperate reflectors for k2, k3, p3???
Here's how I deal with the overload, Susan:
I save http://www.mail-archive.com/elecraft@mailman.qth.net/maillist.html
in my browser. It shows the subject line of all the messages.
Then I read the ones that interest me. I generally look down the
The short answer is that Eric has already spoken on this issue, and has
firmly said no to separate lists.
Either we have a lot of new people on the Elecraft list, or they aren't
bothering to check the archives before dredging up a subject that has
been discussed many times before.
Heck, I let
I suggest we change this reflector stop being about ham radio or
Elecraft products and dedicate the next several hundred post to how
to set e-mail filters on the 6-18 different e-mail clients available
.. Let's NOT, OK?
73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
==
If I have offended anyone with my comment, I offer my apologies.
Consider the discussion closed please.
73,
Peter PA0PJE
Op 20-05-12 20:15, Edward R. Cole schreef:
I suggest we change this reflector stop being about ham radio or
Elecraft products and dedicate the next several hundred post to
From my view we seem to already be experiencing separation of the Elecraft
owners. The Yahoo KX3 group seems to have much more activity than the KX3 does
here. That does not seem to be the case with the K3.
I do not see this as a good thing. I come here for all things Elecraft. I'm
only
Let's end this thread for now.
As we have stated several times in the past, we will not be splitting the list.
Its impossible for us to monitor multiple lists regularly, and it also is
important for us to maintina a central focus for the Elecraft community where
we can get feedback and also
On 5/20/2012 3:03 AM, Ussvdharma wrote:
how about seperate reflectors for k2, k3, p3??? this single one is
getting out of control in length
This comes up periodically [with the usual replies like this one]. Both
Eric and Wayne have repeatedly indicated they do not want multiple email
...@mailman.qth.net
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:44
To: Jim Lowmanjmlow...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] reflectors
From my view we seem to already be experiencing separation of the Elecraft
owners. The Yahoo KX3 group seems to have much more activity than
Guy wrote:
This gets brought up from time to time by those who want everything in the
mail list to be only something they want to read. For those who really
want to do that, every mail program, including major web mail clients like
Google's, has a sorting mechanism to put things in different
John,
Do NOT choose the digest form, it is sent as one email.
Instead choose to receive individual emails and those can be sorted by
your email client as Guy has suggested. The selection between
individual emails and digest is made at mailman.com. Click the Home
link at the bottom of this
I use Apple mail and I have no problem deleting anything that is not of
interest. But, I don't get the digest. I receive each e-mail message
separately. This is the only way to handle a reflector like this so that you
can use the mail filtering and macro actions on mail messages. This is
Don't get the digest. Set the reflector up to send you individual
emails, and then set up filters so that you see only what you want to
see. Should it be Eric and Wayne's responsibility to set up individual
reflectors because people are unwilling to figure out how to filter
their own emails?
I was one of the early users of the CQ-Contest reflector, back in the
90s, and it was a long time before I became aware that hams were the
only ones who referred to these things as reflectors rather than
m,ailing lists or listservs. It also used to be that anyone posting
on one of these
Pete, I'll see your curmudgeon-ness and raise you a couple of gadflies.
That appears to be a fad; folks who have no desire to be identified or help,
just to stir pots, make waves, and think it's funny. The list manager here is
working the issue, I know from his posts.
73, Monty K2DLJ
Or
Pete - Even though you're older than me, I can one-up you by saying I used
the Internet (Usenet) in the mid-70s while in college and well as from home
in the 80s with a UUCP emulator on my Commodore 64 :.)
Yes, I do prefer postings with name/callsign. I believe it should be a list
requirement,
Pete,
I think the answer is simple - just do not respond to posts where the
sender does not want to identify himself. I *might* try one response if
it looks like a sincere request for help from someone, but I will ask
that they identity (firstname and callsign) on any subsequent posts.
I
Not at all, It is just plain courtesy to end your post with name and
call sign on our amateur reflectors. It is beyond me as to why one
would do otherwise.
73s Jim, W4ATK
http://web.me.com/jimrogers_w4atk
On Dec 8, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Pete Smith wrote:
I was one of the early users of the
If your name and call sign are part of your email address, why?
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Reflectors-73-and-so-on-tp5815207p5815360.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Pete,
I don't think this is curmudgeonly at all. I try to sign off with 73 on
internet forum
postings (such as on eHam), as well on e-mail lists like this one.
I figure if I can't say 73, meaning, of course best regards, then
perhaps I
shouldn't send it.Keeps me in check!
73,
Chuck
1). It's a rule on this reflector. Those who don't know that, haven't read the
periodic posting of the rules.
2) Your email address doesn't show up in the body of the message. Well maybe if
you
have a sig line.
3) It's a courtesy us old fogeys really really like.
73, Mike NF4L
On 12/8/2010
As per the list guidelines, its perfectly OK to have your name and call
(if you have a call) show up just in the email from: address. This
shows on all emails resent by the list server.
Let's end discussion on this topic as per my last posting ending the thread.
73, Eric WA6HHQ
Elecraft
:-) (or should I say, Hi-Hi?).
I use 73 in e-mails too, but I use it like I use it on the air - as part of
a final salutation. When I expect to see more on the subject directed to me,
I don't us it just as I don't use it to end every transmission on the air.
As the saying goes, Civility Is The
35 matches
Mail list logo
