I researched this at one point also, and I believe you can't have them in
there at the same time. There's not room for the KAT2 and the KPA100 both in
the same top cover and I don't believe it'll even work electrically.
So you're pretty much stuck with one or the other and an external tuner in
Ted:
You might look into building the K2/100 in the 'Twins' configuration. To
switch from 100 watts to qrp just requires disconnection the power amp box.
This configuration allows the KAT2 to be used along with the high power tuner.
I built mine that way and it works very well.
Brian
All,
At the risk of this request being lost in the euphoric response to the
K3 K-Pod. I'm wondering what options you might be using / prefer to
provide the PTT function for a K3S connected headset. I know options
including (1) VOX, (2) PTT button on an alternative plugged in
microphone,
A question for those who have the K2/100 ---
I finished building and am now becoming familiar with operating the K2/100 and
the KAT100-1. It’s a great combination; but for portable work it’s heavy and
there are two boxes. At the time I bought it I did not purchase the KAT2 – the
internal low
While not exactly what you are looking for in monitoring your output signal,
this is the way I set up my audio on my K2. This was published back in May
2009 in QST Hints and Kinks.
Many of the new rigs have the capability for one to listen to transmitted
audio, for setting up levels,
Hi,
An audio splitters is just a plain T junction and can not be used in
reverse. That will probably just produce lots of distortion as the the low
impedance audio sources are fighting each other. What K7HP is suggesting,
however, using a pair of resistors to form a summing junction from the two
The configuration includes all the calibration data that is specific to each
radio. If you loaded another radio’s config, you would need to do all the
calibration over again.
That seems like a very good reason to me.
wunder
K6WRU
Walter Underwood
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my
NO. FOR GOOD REASON.
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Apr 15, 2016, at 7:12 PM, Merle Bone wrote:
>
> I tried to load my current K3 configuration into my new K3S and got an
> error message saying the serial number did not match. Is there
> a reasonable way to
I tried to load my current K3 configuration into my new K3S and got an
error message saying the serial number did not match. Is there
a reasonable way to load an older K3 configuration into a new
K3S?
Thanks,
Merle - W0EWM
__
Elecraft
I've written a settings saver for the K3. It should work on the K3S, but I
don't have one to test it on. The program reads every Menu and Config setting
that's readable, and stores it in a file. You can read a second radio and
compare the settings side-by-side. The program puts the radio into
How about a "Splitter" used backwards?
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Apr 15, 2016, at 1:26 PM, HankP wrote:
>
> I do this too - BUT have not figured a way to record the SUB rx output at
> same time unless I made some sort of external circuit xfmr or resistors to
If you try to use the "enhanced" cabling setup in the Owner's manual that
uses the accessory cable, the K3 will control which band the KPA500 is on.
I'd use the basic cabling setup shown on page 11, switching both the RF and
key line cables.
73, Ron AC7AC
-Original Message-
From:
Unless I am missing something in your description, the only hardware you
need is a single stereo patch cable (one with 3.5 mm stereo plugs on both
ends) from the stereo Line Out jack on the K3 to the stereo Line In jack on
a standard 2-channel sound card. If your sound card has only a mono input,
Have a look at the sound card's Microphone properties and then click Advanced.
You will probably be able to select a two channel input if a one channel input
is currently selected.
Cheers,
Fred KE7X
For all KE7X Elecraft books, see www.ke7x.com
From:
Ditto that. Don is the consummate professional and has solved some of
the most mystifying problems for me. All while being very reasonable.
And Ditto on the Hakko desoldering tools. Either the 808 or the new
FR-300 are practically worth their weight in gold.
I still use my K2 and it is
What would be an easy way to run two radios (a K3 and a generic radio) with the
KPA500
Putting an manual switch on the input to the KPA 500 is easy enough, but what
aboutthe accessory cable that runs to the K3 and the Key line from the generic
radio?
Thank you
I have used clear nail polish over the lifted traces oncethey have been
re-soldered to hold and protect them.
I'm glad to hear you tackled it again with a clearer head.
From: lstavenhagen
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 9:57 AM
I do this too - BUT have not figured a way to record the SUB rx output at same
time unless I made some sort of external circuit xfmr or resistors to feed LINE
OUT tip and ring to a single input Maybe there is something I am missing ? This
would also allow decoding RTTY from either MAIN or SUB
I concur with the recommendation for a Hakko Desoldering tool. The Hakko 808
has been discontinued but I bought the Hakko FR-300 (the new and 'improved'
version). I use Weller solder stations but the Hakko FR-300 saved my bacon.
I had just soldered a DIP IC in backwards (completely pilot
The modification will involve *only* pin 6 of the RJ jack. Everything else must
remain the same since we use that port for firmware emulation.
No SMDs need be removed or added in this mod. Just one added 1/8th-watt
resistor.
Wayne
N6KR
On Apr 15, 2016, at 9:27 AM, Warren Merkel
Try interconnecting K3 and KX3 to support 17 ham bands from 600
meters to 10-GHz!
http://www.kl7uw.com/station%20layout.htm
Note the station block diagram (scroll down a page). Then scroll
down to the photos (circa 2010). This is an "octopus's
garden"! Wall plate for cable ingress has 10
The two best tools I have found are the HAKKO FX-888D Soldering Station and
the
HAKKO 808 De-Soldering tool. Not exactly in the RS price range, but if you
do
a lot of thru-hole board work, well worth the money.
I don't do much SMD work although I have a Hot Air system and can solder
quite
well
Looks right Joe,
Not knowing if the K-Pod is a 3.3v versus a 5V device, it is hard to
predict. If 3.3v, the 120R on pin 2 could be removed and keep the
protection of the BAT54 zener, leaving barely enough voltage for a 3.3V
dropout regulator in the Pod. If 5V, shorting the 10K on pin 6 would
I sold my K3/100, but I have several items for sale that I used with the radio.
(1) Dust cover by Rose with Elecraft logo $25 with S/H
(2) Yamaha CM500 headset for K3/K3S/KX-3 $45 with S/H
(3) K3 DC power cable (KPCA-F) brand new still in bag/never used $15 with S/H
(4) Array Solutions THP
You need to solder one end of an 1/8th-watt resistor to an SMD, and the other
end to a via nearby.
Or you could send it to us to do the work. Or you could power the pod from the
radio's 12-V output, or a separate 12-V supply. Powering it from the radio one
way or the other is a good idea since
"Simple" you say. Is this another one of those SMD nightmares? :)
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Wayne Burdick wrote:
The mod is very simple, involving soldering one resistor onto the front panel
board.
Wayne
N6KR
On Apr 15, 2016, at 6:31 AM, j...@kk9a.com wrote:
I think that most contest station
Typical loss of the 5- and 6-pole 200-Hz filters is about the same. I believe
we do have enough DSP-based gain compensation for all filter types, but I'll
ask our techs to verify this.
The noise figure of the radio is established ahead of the crystal filters, so
moderate loss in the filters
The mod is very simple, involving soldering one resistor onto the front panel
board.
Wayne
N6KR
On Apr 15, 2016, at 6:31 AM, j...@kk9a.com wrote:
> I think that most contest station use a considerable amount of cables in
> back of the rig. I have a Y on my ACC for a MicroHAM device and a Band
Great news LS.
If that RS desoldering tool is like the one I have somewhere in the bottom
of my junk box, it is not temperature-controlled and does a wonderful job of
delaminating traces from pc boards. It simply gets too hot. That's why mine
is where it is...
73, Ron AC7AC
-Original
I think they are using pin 6, the one with the 10K resistor, to get +5V
to the pod. So it probably will involve bridging the 10K resistor with
a smaller value.
Alan N1AL
On 04/15/2016 06:58 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
On 4/15/2016 9:31 AM, j...@kk9a.com wrote:
How involved is the radio
The 6-pole filters have an offset (like the 5-pole). The offset is clearly
marked on the filter and can be entered into the filter configuration page
using K3 Utility. This has no effect on performance.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
On Apr 15, 2016, at 4:52 AM, Lou Voerman W2ROW wrote:
>
Good to hear you are back in stride, LS!
73, Phil W7OX
On 4/15/16 6:57 AM, lstavenhagen wrote:
Hi all,
Tnx for all the encouragement and suggestions by PM and on the list on my K2
tragedy. After thinking it over after something to eat I decided I didn't
have anything to lose by simply
I know I'll be told to just buy a K3 or KX3, but I love the K2 and am always
looking for ways to improve it. In the menu using SSBA and BAL it's
possible to monitor SSB in your headphones. What I'm wondering is if there
would be a way to make that feature active when actually transmitting so
On 4/15/2016 9:31 AM, j...@kk9a.com wrote:
How involved is the radio modification? I can see this as a
convenient way to use RIT and activate the CW/SSB keyer memories.
From looking at the K3 schematic it looks like not much more than
removing a resistor and adding a jumper or perhaps changing
Hi all,
Tnx for all the encouragement and suggestions by PM and on the list on my K2
tragedy. After thinking it over after something to eat I decided I didn't
have anything to lose by simply continuing on.
My thinking was, ok, this is a learning experience, right? So I figured, ok,
let's learn
I routinely do this... Works great for me... I use a different
program called i-sound. It has a small footprint and works well...
--
73's, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
For software/hardware reviews see:
http://www.nk7z.net
For MixW support see:
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
For
I think that most contest station use a considerable amount of cables in
back of the rig. I have a Y on my ACC for a MicroHAM device and a Band
Decoder and am considering adding another Y for amp control. It think that
it is great if the K-Pod can be run off of a single cable connected
underneath
On 4/15/2016 7:52 AM, Lou Voerman W2ROW wrote:
I have one quick question about the 6 pole filter. Will it have an offset
like the 5 pole filters or will the offset be zero like the 8 pole filters?
Wayne indicated that they will but that matching is not critical when
used with the new
On 4/15/2016 5:33 AM, Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS wrote:
>
Is is possible to see also the comparison plot for new KFL3C-200 vs
old 5-poles/200Hz please?
Wayne promised the comparison plot after they returned from Visalia
(starts today) and have a chance to recover.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 4/15/2016
I have one quick question about the 6 pole filter. Will it have an offset
like the 5 pole filters or will the offset be zero like the 8 pole filters?
Thanks,
Lou W2ROW
--
View this message in context:
Don't see why not.
On 4/14/2016 9:11 PM, Mike Goldstein wrote:
I've been asked to do a workshop on contesting techniques next autumn,
so I'm working on an audio/visual presentation.
Here's the question: For my K3, if I connect a line between the K3
LINE OUT and the PC's LINE IN, will I be
The plots have a disclaimer that one can't compare the passband
attenuation for the filters.
Some of us have noticed that with the old 200 Hz 5 pole filters the
amount of gain available to compensate for it was not enough. I
observed that here by comparing SPECTROGRAM peak outputs per
Wayne and Elecrafters,
You people are wonderful!!Your company is the best.As to
anyone bringing out a 7300 or super duper PC enclosed rig those same
companies will never ever provide the same level of service, communications
and on going development of existing products. On these
Hi Wayne,
excellent! It will be helpful to all who wanted the old 5-poles/200Hz
obsolete option...
Is is possible to see also the comparison plot for new KFL3C-200 vs old
5-poles/200Hz please?
Many thanks,
73 - Petr, OK1RP
-
http://ok1rp.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context:
44 matches
Mail list logo