Not sure off the top of the head but I'm sure that if you pull up a
schematic for a kenwood mic you'd get the answer. I do know that that
is not yet implemented in the firmware. I remember Wayne mentioning
that a while back and haven't seen it added in any of the recent
release notes.
2.5 Watts into 4 ohms if you're willing to put up with 10% THD. Figure
2 watts into 4 ohms.
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 20:41 -0700, Bob W9RFS wrote:
Does anyone know how many watts the audio amp is that feeds the speaker
output connector?
Thanks!
___
Actually the purchaser does have the ability to decide on the importance
of the EMI signature. Many of the laptop products only have to stand up
to the A standard. Where as some companies have tougher requirements
and require things to stand up to a higher standard.
I work for a company that
From my understanding of it the radio has the KPA3 switched out of the
loop until you cross the 12W mark. Then it starts actually putting it
into the signal path. Until you crank the power up beyond 12Watts the
KPA3 is nothing more than an added current drain. But if you turn
things up to 12 or
It makes no RFI at all that bothers you in your situation. The only
product that produces no RFI at all is the pet rock. Its all just a
matter of degree.
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 02:37 -0700, G4ILO wrote:
It is a very high quality product and creates no RFI at
all.
system in CA already seems a bit fragile at times Works for
me... Oregon makes quite a bit of money selling power to you guys!! :)
-Original Message-
From: Vic K2VCO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:41 AM
To: Brett Howard
Cc: Elecraft Users
Subject: Re
The only product that produces no RFI at all is the pet rock.
Even rock has a radiation signature..
BTW - If you are worried about radiation, don't do a walking tour of
Edinburgh, Scotland... Granite is 'radio' active
Noted! ;)
___
Elecraft mailing
Don't worry about doing both... It leaves you that much more sure that you
won't lose connection and trust me... The electrons will forgive your soul
for doing both! :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike B
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008
People talk about the extra current drain. How much is it?
If you go by what W0CZ measured you get this:
The current tests before I put in the KPA3.
Receive 0.94 to 1.1 A
TX (NO POWER) 1.56 A
TX 5W 2.56 A
TX 10W 3.07 A
TX 12W 3.23 A
The same test after the KPA3 was installed, Set up and
schematics. The device is a LM4950TS. Here's a link:
http://www.national.com/pf/LM/LM4950.html#Datasheet
Looks like 3.1 watts into four ohms with less than 1% THD. Is this correct
or am I missinterpreting the specs? Thanks,
Brett Howard wrote:
2.5 Watts into 4 ohms if you're willing
Yea but probably 70% of hams are either dead and not logged yet or
inactive. Then you've got 20% that does casual operation and contesting
and then you've got the 10% in the middle that complain about the
contests. Yet still the majority of the people on the air I fully well
believe participate
I had a gen that would give me 1mV and I found that it produced a signal
that was so wide there was no way to accurately zero up on it. But if I
turned the output of my generator off I found that there was enough
cross talk across the output relay to generate a lot of signal into the
radio. So
I used to work in the audio industry. Was working for a higher end
amplifier manufacturer. We always thought that BOSE actually stood for
Bring Other Sound Equipment. It was also often said No highs no lows
it must be Bose. Honestly though some of their professional line of
amps were quite
I'd be careful there... I've not built a KX1 yet (but plan to) anyway I
just figured I'd take a look at the schematics to see if there was any
way to help you out and keep you going on your build. Anyway the NE602
that is on the board specs 8.0V as its MAX Vin. Seems to me like you
have a
I'd rather not see this on the todo list. I feel the PTT on the DB9 is
more than ample and will prevent many others from sending many windows
sounds over the air. Most software will key a rig over CAT commands and
this is the way this should be done.
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 20:52 -0700, Wim
250 is pretty cheap. I paid more than that when you add up what I paid
for the ER4P's and the molds separately. Yet still in pretty much all
of the monitors I've listened to the Etymotics are about as antiseptic
as I've found. I'm a big fan of a very clean very flat response and the
ety's are
Anyone know of a good spectrogram application for Linux. Preferably
free but that usually goes without saying in Linux. I'm interested in
finding something that will show filter shapes and give actual amplitude
values. I know I can get part of the way there by using waterfalls but
that is not
I'm no where near as pleased with the ER6's as I am the 4's. The 6's
are a lot bigger and a bit cumbersome and no one that I know of will
make a full ear mold of them.
As far as the mic I use a Heil GM4 and a Heil Boom.
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 12:07 -0400, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
250 is
A decent pair of relatively inexpensive full size cans would be the
Sennheiser HD201. You'd probably be pretty happy with these.
Especially for communications use and you'll be able to get them for
under your $50 budget afer shipping.
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 18:47 -0600, DW Holtman wrote:
Hello,
What is the general average size of the passives on the K3 boards? Are
we talking 0402, 0603 or 0805 for the most part? Are there any BGA
components?
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the
It says right there on the site that all Rev B boards have the update. Read
the rev of your board and that is your version control. What more do you
really want?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave G4AON
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008
Boy the lack of K3's arriving has been sudden. The last arrival notice
I've seen and added to the spreadsheet is serial no 615 on 3/20. Anyone
get one more recently than that?
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a
Whats the recommended tool for this. I'm going to buy a tool once and
I'm willing to pay the funds for a good one but would like to know a
good reputable source to find the tool that will give a good price. I'd
like the tool to be specifically (first use) for building my K3 so
that's the main
I love my K1. Was a kick in the pants to build. I found that using
emery cloth to strip the insulation off the torroids was a help as it
allowed me to get things very clean with out doing the heat strip method
which didn't work too well for me. I've made quite a few contacts using
a fanned
Its not always that the data matches up with the experience. I can show
you plenty of speakers with perfectly flat frequency response curves
that sound like complete crap. Read about some of the information that
Sherwood has talked about in the collection of data and actual use of a
product. At
Based on the recent latest K3 shipping verification this is what things
look like...
First link is a graphic of what I've been posting. The second graph is
the length of time waited with respect to the date that the unit
arrived.
http://www.livecomputers.com/web_pics/Serials.png
Yes I asked this question and [EMAIL PROTECTED] himself told me that this is
not going to result in an improvement of phase noise.
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 11:01 +0100, David Woolley (E.L) wrote:
Ken wrote:
Am I right in thinking that the 1 ppm TCXO will have less phase
jitter - hense lower
Well lets put it this way if you are in Europe and you buy an electronic
product its made with lead free solder unless its been on the shelf for
a good long while. The EU recently mandated that all electronic devices
be free of the substances they consider hazardous and lead just so
happens to be
Thats also in much different conditions than what you'll find in most
electronics. But OK since NASA said so all electronic products from now
until eternity are destined to short themselves out and fail nasty
horrible deaths. Oh no what shall we ever do!
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 07:06 -0400,
Yea its called the software release page. If you want there are many
services that can send you an email when a certain website has
changed. Then all you have to do is read the software release notes
and you'll know what is new. You can do the same for the hardware
releases.
On Sun, Apr 6,
I'm quite pleased with the use of the connector. It's a standard relatively
easy to find thing and gets the job done. There are some that won't be
happy no matter what you do.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Harpole
Sent:
I agree that corresponding with the end of the ALC bracket makes sense.
I remember looking at the pictures of the radio after it was mentioned
that the 6th bar was overdrive and I was thinking it odd that the
overdrive point didn't correspond to the end of the ALC brackets. My
Kenwood has a line
I've updated the graphics on my server:
http://www.livecomputers.com/web_pics/Serials.png
http://www.livecomputers.com/web_pics/wait_times.png
Enjoy gentlemen.
PS: Thanks all for publishing your K3's arrivals!
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
Doesn't the radio have a 2-tone generator built into it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AD6XY - Mike
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:12 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [K3] [Elecraft] Checking crystal filters,
Traditionally
Noticing that the linux update app doesn't seem to be able to
communicate with the FTP server. Has no issue downloding the config out
of the radio and seeing what versions its running but can't seem to get
the updates...
Anyone else having this issue or is it only temporary?
Is there a way to erase a memory back to the default NULL state? If not
is there a way to erase them all w/o having to re-cal the rig?
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 22:59 -0700, oh2gqc wrote:
Brett,
I just downloaded the latest sw from Elecraft using
the Linux update app. No problems whatsoever.
So I guess there was a temporary problem with
your connection or Elecraft's FTP-server...
73's de Kari
oh2gqc
Brett Howard
.
So I guess there was a temporary problem with
your connection or Elecraft's FTP-server...
73's de Kari
oh2gqc
Brett Howard wrote:
Noticing that the linux update app doesn't seem to be able to
communicate with the FTP server. Has no issue downloding the config out
of the radio
They are only required to be so in California so far.
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 15:11 +, Brian Alsop wrote:
Ken Kopp wrote:
Hi Ken,
I used to be the line noise tech for my power company
employer ...
Touch lamps are a seldom-thought-of source of line noise.
Wall-warts, too.
I've got a HUGE problem in my area too. It only comes on at night (not
all nights though) and its periodic. Like a lil over a minute on and
then 40 something seconds off and it goes on and off like that all
night. It generally comes on shortly after the street lamps do. A talk
with the power
Many tune in here to get a picture of how production is moving along and the
emails of people getting their confirmation emails and emails of received
units were very appreciated by myself...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of n4lq
Sent:
.
I can make all the trouble I need myself without help from others!
Regards,
Mike VP8NO
- Original Message -
From: Brett Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'n4lq' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Mike Harris'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 7:55 PM
Subject: RE
Please note that using AFX features in that configuration is known to
cause some strange distortion products from the summing of two signals
which are phase delayed from each other. This comment was made by Lyle.
It probably won't be an issue for you I just wanted to make sure you
were informed.
Does anyone know of an adapter that some one sells to adapt an 8-pin mic
plug to the 1/8 / 3.5mm jack on the back? Would be slick to get a
completely clean and empty front panel. I'd even be happy if the PTT
wasn't connected. The VOX works so well its not needed. I'd not want
to use the button
Sounds like a smart addition to me. Protects people from transmitting
into something horrible on accident. Always puts a smile on your face
when software protects you from doing something stupid on accident.
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 19:51 -0700, wayne burdick wrote:
Dave,
I wanted to run a
Ok so we're out at field day and all of the sudden I heard a somewhat
strong signal and then all the receive has gone to low S Meter numbers
yet the radio is not deaf at all.
Whats worse is that I am getting no RF out. Pressing tune the radio
draws about 2.3A and displays -- for the SWR. When
, Brett Howard wrote:
Hadn't tried PA bypass yet but just did and it seems to be not working.
When I hit tune with the rig set to 100mW I get a bit of power out but a
radio next to me only sees me as 20 over cranking the power up to 12
watts in PA Byp and ATU Byp only puts his radio at 40 over
I thought of another feature to help fix the stupid user issue. How
about a lock that doesn't allow a band change. Such as a special way to
use the lock button that doesn't lock one out from QSYing but doesn't
allow them to move off of say 40 meters. We had a death to a band pass
filter cause
Go into the config menu and set TECH MD to on then repeat the steps you
mentioned below.
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 22:37 -0700, Lee Buller wrote:
I've been trying to determine what the FP and the PA temps are during FD and
the book says that you should be able to tap DISP and then use VFO B to
They laughed at my K1 too and said that life was too short for QRP.
Then as they were putting up the antenna I proceeded to make a contact
from the Oregon coast to southern California at 7 watts with the antenna
still laying on the ground.
Then I got to have a LOT of fun making about 250+
You need to select the slot number that your 2.7Khz filter is in. I'm
getting the same ERR TXG failure on all bands with my rig and have low
receiver sensitivity and it just happened all of the sudden during field
day. Not sure what happened but I'll be certain to post the findings
once I get it
cant do everything for you. Why anyone would let a stupid user
operate their 2K radio at a field day site is beyond me. Jim K4JAF
- Original Message -
From: Brett Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wayne burdick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Elecraft Reflector elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent
I had this problem too but usually what it is is simply the fact that
you didn't power cycle the radio after setting the ATU to bypass for the
first time in the config menu.
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 11:46 -0700, OE5CSP-Chris wrote:
Got some very good hints but the sensitivity on all bands is still
I'd also like to see the CW memories and things like that that all get
changed for events like that be things that are able to be backed up in
the configuration.
Also is there any way to REALLY clear the radio. Holding down shift/low
and powering up does a reset of the parameters but things like
When I was a kid and had my tech license I only operated on 2m packet
and fm repeater operation. I really liked that I could go in on 2m or
440 and then come out on HF packet and get a little further. But the
only time I got to operate on the real bands was during field day. As a
kid I loved it
I was thinking it would be nice for the owner of the radio. Cause if
the op isn't the owner and the op makes a mistake the owner is out. But
ok I'm an idiot.
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 12:44 +, Brian Alsop wrote:
In my opinion you don't want to burden the radio with this.
The preferred way
Agreed this is a very interesting proposition.
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 10:00 -0400, Don Wilhelm wrote:
There was discussion of a future firmware change that would allow
different confgurations to be loaded - such as only 80, 40, 20, 15, and
10 for a specific contest. Once implemented, and
Have you tried re-doing the tune at 5 watts and 50 watts to try and
recalibrate the tx gain settings?
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 20:30 -0700, Don Ehrlich wrote:
Starting with my first qso after loading Beta 2.10 last week my K3 shut down
(turned off) unexpectedly in the middle of an SSB qso while I
Ok so I've done the hold shift/low while turning on and I've been able
to reset all the radio parameters but I find that the CW memories and
also the frequency memories are retained. Is there a way to erase ALL
the settings and get things back into the shape the radio was when I
first finished
I see a lot of references to the service manual (such as when you have
an ERR TXG) is this manual just not done yet? I see no mention of it in
the manual download area.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a
Some have also added black tape to the top panel in the locations where
it comes into contact with certain areas of the chassis.
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 20:23 -0700, Allan Taylor wrote:
After a rather hectic month, I finally got my K3 on the air this
afternoon. (Worked by coincidence another K3:
Depends on if you are talking K3/10 or K3/100 either way you'd probably
do just fine with a 25A. If you want a little more room you'd be just
fine with a 30A in there too. Being that is what your connectors are
rated to.
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 20:56 -0700, Blachura wrote:
What is a
HAHA... At FD one of the operators said... Man I really love the way
the receiver sounds but NOBODY will come back to me. On his next
transmission I noticed that there was no RF showing up on the bar graph.
Then I noticed the flashing TX... I mentioned to him that he was in
test mode. Poof one
Tom HAS to do well! He's the only one who's often there to relay and
slow down for me so I can get into ECN! :) We're all thinking about you
Tom and wish you the very best.
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 08:32 +0100, David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:
And a K3 field tester who has helped me a lot and given
Agreed XML could be a good way to set things up. As well it would be
helpful for Elecraft in the future as if you're having trouble they can
ask you to send in your config and they can quickly open it and find
problems if they're in there.
I was kinda hoping that when I read the config out of my
Morse code legends are cool. I always kinda dug that the kenwood would
beep the first char of the mode that you just set things to. Now that
I'm starting to learn code a little better I start to like them more and
more. I'd put them at VERY low priority but do have to admit they're
more of a
If you've seen HTML its somewhat similar. XML is like HTML but with
more stringent rules. Its VERY human readable and quite simple to work
with. As far as the argument that it results in large files people are
living in the past. Broadband is becoming more and more common place
and USB sticks
You can display the RIT offset using the disp menu feature while tech md
is on. Then you can see the delta F in place of the VFO B. The only
downside is that you have to use the small knob to set y our delta f.
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 12:41 +0100, Stewart Baker wrote:
As far as I can see it is
Does anyone know of an adapter that will take a Kenwood 8-pin mic jack
and set things up so it will fit into the 3.5mm mic jack on the back?
Or is this one of those things that I'd have to make...
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 19:39 -0500, Tom Childers, N5GE wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:23:20 -0700
Has anyone done a burn in on their radios to test? They rate to 100W
100% duty cycle for 10 minutes. I'm sure there is quite a bit of
headroom in that too. Has anyone tested to that? Do any of the
Elecraft guys object to that type of testing?
I had a strange failure at FD this year and
So am I to assume that the 8-pole filters are not going to need to worry
about this as they are all at 0 anyway? What is the advantage of
getting two matched pairs of 5-pole filters when you can get two 8-poles
for only 10 bucks a filter more?
I'm assuming that its 100 + 100 + 30 for matched
I agree that sounds like a pretty good test.
The K3 is a PHENOMENAL radio and I'm very familiar with things breaking
in their infancy. I'm just hoping that the kinks are very well buried
when it comes back. Appreciate the tips on what you did
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 09:25 -0400, John
Yes I'm still working on keeping stats...
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Totally agree. I was somewhat appreciative that FD helped me find the
problem as soon as possible and was wondering if solid type TX would be
a good way to do an accelerated test. From what I'm hearing now and I
agree a FD simulation w/ full QSK running is probably more real world.
You are
Sorry for the added bandwidth but for worry of the rig getting broken I
vote to no have a fix implemented. In my mind I consider the 20 meter
band below the 10 meter band. So yes when I press DOWN on a band switch
I expect to go to lower frequencies. I'm sure there are many who think
I'm dumb
You need to do the rotation while still holding the knob in.
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 07:31 +0100, Dave G4AON wrote:
and ALT2. To save a filter
setup, hold NORM until you see - SAV - (3 seconds), then rotate
the
knob left or right to save it as ALT1
Now we've got 3 separate threads asking people not to have separate
threads... How ironic... :)
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 07:30 -0400, George Victor wrote:
Hi Folks,
Please don't take this the wrong way, this is just my opinion.
I feel that if a thread is started, all of the related replies
I find that the narrower filters take out a lot of the noise before it
hits the DSP and it can even make just rag chew conditions nicer in my
very electrically noisy area. Actually I'm quite excited that once I
get my K3 back that I can set the 250Hz filter to be able to use it up
at 350. I even
Being tha t it was mentioned that best responses seem to be with a
roofing filter wider than 300Hz and then he mentioned the 250Hz filter
wouldn't you deduce that he meant the 370Hz filter which Elecraft calls
250Hz? I mean maybe I'm jumping to conclusions here but that was pretty
clear to me.
therefore uses
the 8-pole 250 Hz filter which it seems clear you know is 370Hz and
therefore fits the build of what is required. Then behind that he has a
200Hz filter at the DSP IF.
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:35 -0700, Bill W4ZV wrote:
Brett Howard wrote:
Being tha t it was mentioned that best
This is in a completely different area but trust me on this one... See
if you can find R66 on t he bottom of the RF board toward the right side
of the unit when you're looking at the unit from the front. Its just
above Q8 and Q9. Measure the resistance of R66 and post that here.
On Tue,
I agree with this assessment and when I get my rig back plan on upping
my 250 filter to kick in at 350. But I had 4dB of gain on the 250 and
it still seemed like things got a lot quieter when switching to the 250.
I'd have to measure and see if I had the actual same level there (and I
can do that
Ok then so you don't have that problem... Do you have an oscilloscope
handy? Or can you take a measurement with your RF probe on pin 6 of the
reference board? Take a measurement on both pin 6 and pin 8 of the
connector where the reference board meets up with the RF board if you can...
No actually you have to set the tun pwr config setting to NOR (I
believe) in order to get that to happen...
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 11:10 -0700, Ken Roberson wrote:
Jim,
This will key the K3 and it will put out whatever power you
have it set for, I set mine for 55 watts.
73 Ken K5DNL
You sure you have the ANT setting on the correct antenna?
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 07:49 +0100, John Francis wrote:
When I tap ATU I get a SWR reading on all bands except when I am on 80mtrs.
where all I get is - - ,
I was getting a SWR reading on 80mtrs but this has now disappeared.
I'm still field testing 3.20 I think it is as that one accidentally
had the better LF response... I had to go back when it got taken
away... Looking forward to getting the more NR options AND LF response!
Thanks Elecraft!
~Brett
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 23:50 -0700, PA3CW wrote:
Hello Wayne,
This was asked for in the past and it turns out that more people wanted
it the way it is at the moment but it was not really a landslide it was
fairly balanced.
Personally I agree and would like the option to have it track the AF
knob. But this hasn't really risen to the top of the list (if it
I've been considering just ordering one on the site... Not really a
need as I've already got the 8 filters in there that I like but I
wouldn't mind being able to get the radio totally open just to allow for
maximum flexibility.
If anyone has a Broadcast Band BPF or a 13Khz filter that is surplus
I remember somewhere on the net reading about some mods to make the
K1-NB a little bit more aggressive. I've been unable to find this as of
late and would like to in the event that a few free moments presents its
self in the next month or so...
Anyone recall where that may be?
~BTH (KC7OTG)
I think most who feel they have to have buttons for all bands and what
not haven't really spent much time learning the newer interface as
recalling the memories as band switch is quite fast. Then if you use
the M1-M4 as mode switch it puts you in the right frequency area and
puts you in the right
hrm...
I could have swore that there was a set of mods that would allow one to
modify the blanking time and what not a bit...
I'm finding it ineffective in power line noise and would like to try and
make it more so. However if I end up with the time to do it I'll
probably not have enough time
So I think I may have found a strange bug. Please someone tell me if
you can reproduce it.
With the latest 3.33 pre-released test I am unable to set the top two
knobs to HI/LOW adjustments. However this problem is only present when
the radio is in the CW mode. When in this mode tapping the
Ah yes it does look like that is the case. Went back and read it and it
clearly states (there are some limitations at present). Thats somewhat
of an esoteric one... Wonder if at some point it can be supported.
Seems like it was a difficult one to figure out at the time so rather
than dig into
Yes but unless the response remains that way when an 8 ohm speaker is
there its not a very useful measurement.
~BTH
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 07:56 -0700, Ignacy wrote:
Is this measured with high impedance probes? If I remember correctly, small
caps limit low-frequency response of K3 especially
Personally I have one folder that the list as a whole is filtered into
then I have another folder that any @elecraft.com or lyle's email
address go into.
You can do this with gmail using the label's. This is how I do it. If
you want further help on how to make it go let me know and I can
Not too long ago there was some debate about the Fast QSY function that
can be used if you set VFO OFS = 1.
There were those who feel that the fast QSY function should *not* clear
the LSB's so that if you use it (or perhaps accidentally bump it) you
have an easier time getting back to the
Are there any thoughts as to the accuracy level in dBm in correlation
with this mod? As well as any sort of absolute accuracy specs on what
we expect to see with this box?
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 16:58 -0700, Alan Bloom wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 19:08 -0400, amstel78 wrote:
So would it be
You guys know that there is also a feature that will automatically
correct for this offset when changing modes. It automatically uses your
pitch frequency as the offset. It was released several versions ago.
Read through the release notes and you'll find it in there.
~Brett
On Tue, 2009-09-22
If it were within +/- 2.0dB absolute accuracy I'd be tickled pink.
However your comments about spectrum analyzers today are a bit dated.
Power meters are becoming much less crucial for getting accurate
readings.
We just bought a new spectrum analyzer from Agilent which with all the
options we
Excellent post! I was trying to remember where this was but wasn't
remembering off the top of my head. Thanks for providing that for these
guys. I think there are a good number of K3 users out there that wish
they had a feature to do that one thing that bugs them and little do
they know that
1 - 100 of 916 matches
Mail list logo
