Dan Pressley is correctheadphone choice is personal. Being severely
hearing impaired with BTE hearing aids in both ears I found the GRADO SR
basic phones excellent. They are open back which allows the usage without
the nasty feedback from closed back. Not all phones are compatible with
hearing
I guess it is personal..I purchased a pair of the Arlan phones earlier this
year and I would never use anything else. They were a total game changer for me
in terms of comfort and clarity.I am almost exclusively a CW guy. This was the
first field day in years I didn’t end up throwing a headset
I have used the Heil Pro 7 also. While they displayed no RFI issues, they
fall far behind the Bose QC35s, Radiosport, and even Bose QC25s in keeping
out KPA1500 fan noise. They worked FB for me in the CQWW SSB test, where
the KPA1500 fans rarely turn on, and never get louder than FAN1 at my
man.qth.net
> Subject: [Elecraft] Headphones (Again!) I recently purchased a Bose QC-45.
> I used it for about 5 minutes in a CWops contest, and got RF in the left
> headphone. I disconnected it, and returned to my Bose QC-35's. The QC-45's
> have been returned to Amazon.I had a si
from my Galaxy
Original message From: John Reilly
Date: 19/11/2021 01:16 (GMT+00:00) To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject:
[Elecraft] Headphones (Again!) I recently purchased a Bose QC-45. I used it for
about 5 minutes in a CWops contest, and got RF in the left headphone. I
I recently purchased a Bose QC-45. I used it for about 5 minutes in a
CWops contest, and got RF in the left headphone. I disconnected it, and
returned to my Bose QC-35's. The QC-45's have been returned to Amazon.
I had a similar problem earlier in the year with the Bose 700
headphones. I
I'm not sure that boosting high frequencies (assuming you have simple,
age related, type losses) is really a safe thing to do. Whilst hearing
aids do this, they also apply dynamic range compression, to minimise the
additional hearing damage caused by the aid for loud sources.
Incidentally,
You would need the most recent BLE 5.0 or above, with low latency support.
Then the delay is perhaps small enough that it won't make you crazy. I have
a Bluetooth transmitter in my bag to plug into devices that don't have
Bluetooth support, but I haven't used it for CW. Simple enough to use,
On 10/13/2021 9:18 PM, elelist...@elitemail.org wrote:
Headphones over these tends to cause feedback howl.
If your aids have programmable settings that you can select from a menu,
feedback could be eliminated by reducing gain when wearing phones.
For me, the direct connection to my
Further to my recent email, here is an URL for usage instructions for the
Taotronics dongle.
https://www.taotronics.com/pages/how-to-use-taotronics-wireless-transmitter-adapter
Prices are now around $30
Kevin (Elec eng gone bad - I got sucked into IT, the last refuge of scoundrels)
On Thu,
The bluetooth dongle is branded Taotronics on one side, and on the other,
"Wireless 2-in-1 Adapter Model TT-BA08 Input 5 v 280 mA FCCID:2AFDGBAXX Made in
China"
73 all
Kevin VK3DAP / ZL2DAP
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, at 15:58, Julia Tuttle wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Which dongle is that? Low-latency
Hi Kevin,
Which dongle is that? Low-latency Bluetooth transmitters are hard to come
by and the specific model might be useful to others.
73,
Julie
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, 00:19 wrote:
> I have Phonak aids that are bluetooth enabled. Headphones over these
> tends to cause feedback howl. For
I have Phonak aids that are bluetooth enabled. Headphones over these tends to
cause feedback howl. For me, the direct connection to my receiver via
bluetooth works well. I have a bluetooth dongle that plugs into the xcvr audio
output. The dongle cost me about AUD14.00. I paired it with my
I also tried with the device Resound sells. It just didn't work very
well for CW, even though I asked the audiologist to program my aids to
not try to suppress tones around 500 Hz. I didn't check the delay,
because the sound was too weak to be usable. Worked great for TV,
though. Ultimately I
The Heil PRAS works extremely well for me.
73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 3:54 PM Robert Strickland via Elecraft <
elecraft@mailman.qth.net> wrote:
> I have ReSound hearing aids with a BlueTooth receive capability. They
> link up with my iPhone automatically. Can I buy a generic
On 10/13/2021 4:01 PM, jerry wrote:
I tried this. On CW, no go. Too much delay in the bluetooth. I could
not send.
Yes, this a deal-killer if you're a CW op, and it can be a bit
disconcerting (although not nearly as bad) if you also monitor your SSB
signal.
Several suggestions.
First,
I tried this. On CW, no go. Too much delay in the bluetooth. I could
not send.
- Jerry KF6VB
On 2021-10-13 15:52, Robert Strickland via Elecraft wrote:
I have ReSound hearing aids with a BlueTooth receive capability. They
link up with my iPhone automatically. Can I buy a
I have ReSound hearing aids with a BlueTooth receive capability. They
link up with my iPhone automatically. Can I buy a generic BlueTooth
transmitter, plug it into my K3s and have the same type of hassle free
link, or are there compatibility technical issues about which I am
unaware? Thanks
After reading the replies and trying out some options, I decided to try what
John (K4TOO) suggested. I was amazed at the results of using the bone
conduction headphones. My HF hearing loss is a result of machinery noise from
the Submarine service with associated tinnitus. Basically I have
I may have missed or forgotten it; but does the computer portion of the
K4 (the network chip specifically) allow for BlueTooth audio from the RF
portion so one could use a BT headset (hearing aids)?
I have a BT headset with a (no boom) mic used on a iPhone that would be
awesome to retask for
Thanks to everyone. A lot of good experience and advice to consider.
Keeping Watch -
shu
Joe Shuman, NZ8P
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post:
On 1/26/2021 1:24 PM, Phil Kane wrote:
My aids are Phonak Audeo as well - high priced devices that are behind
the ear with receivers in the outer canal.
Several comments here. First, hearing "doctors" who sell hearing aids
get a 100% commission for what they sell, doubling the cost to the
My Philips hearing aids (Costco sourced) work well under my Yamaha CM500
headphones and have all the aforementioned control capabilities. I didn’t
opt for rechargeable batteries as the feature did not appear cost
effective.
Bill K4YJJ
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 2:25 PM Mark Wheeler via Elecraft <
On 1/26/2021 11:40 AM, David Bunte wrote:
The option of piping your rig into your hearing aids might be the solution
if you have that option.
My aids are Phonak Audeo as well - high priced devices that are behind
the ear with receivers in the outer canal. I also use a Phonak
CommPilot
Shu -
Please allow me to add my thoughts to the discussion. My hearing loss is
not profound, but when I started using hearing aids I had to ditch my
Yamaha CM-500 headset, as its over the ear style rubbed against the behind
the ear receiver in canal style of my hearing aid. That made for a LOT of
Shu,
I have pretty severe hearing loss and my solution is a behind the ear Bluetooth
controlled hearing aid that has an accompanying smart phone app that allows me
to boost or otherwise customize on the fly bass, mids, and treble. Additional
on the fly customizable features include noise
Firstly, nothing above about 3.4kHz is relevant for communications, and
for typical SSB that is down to about 2.7 to 3kHz.
However, with a large hearing loss, you really need to find a solution
that uses the hearing aids, as digital aids will have safety features
and dynamic range compression
I think a class-action lawsuit is in order against Boston, the Electric
Light Orchestra and General Dynamics.
John AE5X
https://ae5x.blogspot.com
>I have moderate to heavy hearing loss after spending 10 years on the
>flight line around jet engines. Rock and roll didn't help much either.
I have moderate to heavy hearing loss after spending 10 years on the
flight line around jet engines. Rock and roll didn't help much either. I
like the open air Yeasu YH77sta in the shack and on filed day when you
need to talk with a logger. They do not interfere with my Phonak over
the ear
I use the Heil PARS with Bose QC35 headphones which are far and away the
most comfortable cans I have ever used. Until I got them, I gave up on cans
and just used earbuds. My hearing loss is mostly limited to my left ear, so
I break out the left audio stream to the PARS and adjust volume so it is
Following with great interest - as have a similar issue
On Tuesday, January 26, 2021, 11:24:41 AM EST, Joseph Shuman via Elecraft
wrote:
I have severe high-frequency hearing loss, up to 85 dB at 6-8KHz and 60 dB at
3-4KHz. Lower than that my hearing is close to normal for my age. I
I have severe high-frequency hearing loss, up to 85 dB at 6-8KHz and 60 dB at
3-4KHz. Lower than that my hearing is close to normal for my age. I use
hearing aids and the style I have won’t work with headphones. I have the
equalizer on the KX2 set to boost the highs, OK with an external amp
>>>The Sony phones are great. I didn't use them with ham radio though. Too
>>>large of a freq response<<<
There're no undesirable frequencies in the audio going to my Sony phones so I
don't need them to do any subsequent filtering. The filtering and shaping of
the audio occurs before the
. K4 Roadtrip. Winter field day (Greg Herman)
>
>
>------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:59:35 -0500
>From: Paul Ecker
>To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>Subject: [Elecraft] Headphones
>Message-I
Thanks to Elliott WA6TLA steering me to the TriState Camera website, just
ordered the MDR-7506's for a great price. Thanks again to all for the
great advice.
73 Paul w2eck
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
Well seems like the Sony MDR-7506 is the way to go. Thank you to all for
the recommendations and explanations on why.
73 & Be Safe
Paul
w2eck
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
On 5/10/2020 8:14 AM, Gwen Patton wrote:
> I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
Neither did I, but I am a lawyer who deals in this area.
Part 15 sets the minimum standard for RF emissions from devices that do
not require individual or blanket station licenses. If they don't
It's clear that if you are the one with the Part 15 device, and someone
else interferes with that device, because of the law you have to just suck
it up because Part 15 devices aren't made to be "hardened" against
interference to the same degree other devices under different parts of the
law might
The answer to your question seems obvious to me. I am not a lawyer. Your
equipment had to operate too much more stringent requirements because human
life is at stake. The part 15 "must accept" clause says that if you are
being interfered with on your Part 15 device, is it not legal grounds to
I do want to understand what "must accept" means. Why did the FCC put #2 in
there?
I'm from the avionics industry. We have to not produce unwanted RF
interference and we have to operate correctly in the presence of high
levels of RF. Especially in recent years, someone could put their phone
down
On 5/9/2020 7:08 PM, Nr4c wrote:
Beg to differ.
Ummm, K2ASP is a retired FCC inspector. Now works as a consultant to
those who need help with communications systems issues. I think we can
take anything he says to the bank. :)
73, Jim K9YC
On 5/9/2020 7:08 PM, Nr4c wrote:
> Beg to differ. Part 15 devices have no legal protection from
interference. You use at your own risk.
That's what I said. We deal with that professionally.
>> (2) this device must accept any interference received, including
>>> interference that may cause
Beg to differ. Part 15 devices have no legal protection from interference. You
use at your own risk.
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On May 9, 2020, at 9:49 PM, Phil Kane wrote:
>
> On 5/9/2020 1:32 PM, Mark Goldberg wrote:
>
>> Have you contacted Bose? They are FCC part 15 and even
On 5/9/2020 1:32 PM, Mark Goldberg wrote:
> Have you contacted Bose? They are FCC part 15 and even say this in the user
> manual:
> (2) this device must accept any interference received, including
> interference that may cause undesired operation.
Part 15 deals with *generating* unwanted RF
If the manual says the headphone must accept any interference, I doubt Bose
will do much.
John K7FD
> On May 9, 2020, at 1:32 PM, Mark Goldberg wrote:
>
> Have you contacted Bose? They are FCC part 15 and even say this in the user
> manual:
>
> This device complies with part 15 of the FCC
Have you contacted Bose? They are FCC part 15 and even say this in the user
manual:
This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules and with Industry Canada
license-exempt RSS standard(s).
Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may
not cause harmful
That's a bummer. The wired Bose QC25’s show no signs of RFI while running my
KPA500. I even bought a spare pair of QC25’s when the price was right. I do go
through a few batteries...maybe two a month. The noise cancelling sure wipes
out all ambient room noise, amplifier fan noise, TV, and
FWIW, I bought a pair of the Bose 700 headphones, and I'm NOT happy.
They are very susceptible to RF, especially on 40 and 80m. They make
their system "bong" sound when I transmit. I have tried several toroid
chokes, even one close to the ear piece -- no help. On 40m, I have the
problem at
Of Clay Autery
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 10:11
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones
>
> My Sennheiser HD6XX are neither bulky or heavy, but over-the-ear from
> larger drivers generally produces better results all around.
> I have A/B tested over-the-ear
: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net On
Behalf Of Clay Autery
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 10:11
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones
My Sennheiser HD6XX are neither bulky or heavy, but over-the-ear from larger
drivers generally produces better results all around.
I have
My Sennheiser HD6XX are neither bulky or heavy, but over-the-ear from
larger drivers generally produces better results all around.
I have A/B tested over-the-ear, on-ear, and in-ear...
On-ear, for me is the worst of all worlds. I use my in-ear wireless BLE
stereo set when I am in a noisy
IUnless you're in a multi-op or noisy environment, why go with bulky, heavy,
over the ear models?
I've used a Sony MDR-W08 for years. Appears that model is discontinued, but
there are similar ones. It weighs 1 oz(!) and cost about $20 when I got
them. Do a search and you'll find similar ones.
On 5/7/2020 12:17 PM, Erik B wrote:
> I am so far resisting hearing aids, as my R side hearing is fine.
I have been using aids for over a decade. The L side needs one sort of
equalization, the R side does not. Any competent audiologist can adjust
an aid to be flat. Several times I have gone
On 5/7/2020 12:17 PM, Erik B wrote:
I am
so far resisting hearing aids, as my R side hearing is fine.
If you want to consider aids, go to Costco. They sell very good stuff at
half the price of audiologists, they have first rate test equipment to
check hearing and to adjust aids to fit
ay 07, 2020 10:51 AM
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones
>
> On 5/7/2020 10:38 AM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
> > I
> > built a breakout box so it only is used on my mostly deaf left ear.
> > The PRAS works so well that I actually forget I
K7TV
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net On
Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2020 10:51 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones
On 5/7/2020 10:38 AM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
> I
> built a breakout box so it only is used on my
Comfort is just one consideration. If you use Bose QC35s with Bluetooth there
is a delay that increases over time. No problem listening to music. But if you
watch TV the delay becomes intolerable.
For BT use to watch TV you want a set using the Qualcomm APTX LL (low latency)
codec.
The Bose
On 5/7/2020 10:38 AM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
I
built a breakout box so it only is used on my mostly deaf left ear. The
PRAS works so well that I actually forget I have a hearing deficit while
doing SO2R. I have a hearing aid for my left ear, but it doesn't improve
intelligibility at all. The PARS
100% Bose QC25 here. Lightweight. Over the ear. Stay cool. Noise cancelling.
Love 'em!
John K7FD
> On May 7, 2020, at 10:38 AM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
>
> I recently received the Bose Quiet Comfort II headphones as a gift. I used
> them on my next flights to PEI for airplane noise reduction
I recently received the Bose Quiet Comfort II headphones as a gift. I used
them on my next flights to PEI for airplane noise reduction and it works
well for that. They were so comfortable that I used them in the contest
when I arrived in PEI. I now prefer the Bose headphones over earbuds which
I
Another vote for MDR-7506. I'm a 99 44/100 CW ope and don't need the
microphone. The Sony are light, cover my entire ear, and replacement OEM
pads relatively available. Nice carrying case comes with it (for those
that travel).
Clark WU4B
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:26 PM wrote:
> If you do
The Sony MDR-V6's - the digital version of the 7506 - can be seen in movies
quite a bit... "Whistler" (David Strathairn) wears them in the movie
"Sneakers" and "Seaman Jones" (Courtney Vance) wears them in "The Hunt for
Red October."I've also seen the musicians in Postmodern Jukebox wearing
I've been using a set of Sennheiser HD598SE phones for a couple of years
now and love them, but I am in receipt TODAY
of a set of Sennheiser HD6XX phones from DROP (formerly Mass Drop).
This model is a cooperative venture between Drop and Sennheiser
to provide near "flagship" performance,
junkie.I also
like the Yamaha and Koss a lot.73,Gary K9GS
Original message From: j...@kk9a.com Date: 5/6/20 9:25 PM
(GMT-06:00) To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones If
you do not need a microphone, the Sony MDR-7506 that K9YC has mentionednumerous
times
If you do not need a microphone, the Sony MDR-7506 that K9YC has mentioned
numerous times on this list is just awesome. These are high quality
headphones that sound great and are super comfortable. I use mine for all CW
and RTTY contests plus occasionally for other things around the house.
John
I bought the Yamaha phones a couple of years ago. They were fine for a while
but the microphone was very loose and kept getting in the way and then the foam
earpiece covering all fell apart. So, when I thought about it, it occurred to
me that the younger generation that does a lot of gaming for
Thanks to all for the info, the pro 7 look nice from Heil, but not sure if they
can be used with the K3s. I like using a Hiel fist mic which gets good audio
reports, but my lugs are not as good as they used to be so need good phones. A
good group of Elecraft users on this site, I enjoy reading
I use the Yamaha CM500 from Amazon about $58 with my K3. I bought the Koss
SB45 from Amazon about $23 shipped. I think the Koss is every bit as good
as the Yamaha. I haven't used the Koss on the K3 but expect it would
perform equally. I use it on my Icom 7300 and get nothing but good reports.
I use an older Heil pro set with HC-5 element on my K3, with great results.
One nice thing on the K3 or K3S is that you can plug the two 3.5mm plugs
directly into the back of the rig- no adapters needed, and no cables
hanging out the front of the radio.
However, my advice to anyone is that the
I have used the Elite Pro with success. The dynamic mic element
version, with bias turned OFF.
For an alternate suggestion, many use and like the (inexpensive) Yamaha
CM-500 / Koss SB-45 headset, with it's electret element.
Ron
On 1/14/2017 9:33 AM, Alex Dokic via Elecraft wrote:
Hi,
Hi, can anyone advise or recommend what Heil headphones work well with the k3s
many thanks . Alex M0 KVA
Sent from my iPhone
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
If I connect my Pro-7 headset as well as the PR-781 Mic to the back of the
K3, how do I select which audio source I want to use with the K3?
73s HK2LS / Larry
--
Larry Snyder, RN.ORG, SA
Each and Every Day Thousands of Nurses depend on www.RN.org
http://www.RN.org for their Nursing
Larry,
There is only one mic jack in the back, so I am not sure how you plug 2
microphones into one 3.5mm jack.
You can plug one into the front 8 pin Foster jack and the other into the
rear jack - switch between them in the MIC SEL menu.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 6/5/2015 5:49 PM, Larry Snyder
Thanks for the reply, guys. I know the cables are cheap - I just bought
replacements on Ebay $2.39 for 2, including shipping! Just a pain,
especially when it fails during a contest, like this one did during the IARU
last week.
Barry W2UP
P.S. Sorry for forgetting to ID in my earlier post :-)
!
On Sat, 7/19/14, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones and extension cable - leave plugged in?
IMHO, the trouble of
removing the plug and plugging it back in is not
worth the cost of a replacement cable. I
suspect it has worked fine for
several
years
On 7/20/2014 6:50 AM, Bill Blomgren (kk4qdz) via Elecraft wrote:
In the broadcast stations I worked at over the year, the audio patch panels had
a lot of activity
Do not confuse the high quality cables and plugs used in studio patch
bays with the cheap crap we find in today's consumer
intermittent, but just very slightly oxidized.
73, Charlie k3ICH
- Original Message -
From: Barry w...@comcast.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 11:39 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] Headphones and extension cable - leave plugged in?
With my K3, I use the 3.5mm headphone
IMHO, the trouble of removing the plug and plugging it back in is not
worth the cost of a replacement cable. I suspect it has worked fine for
several years. If not, look for a better quality cable.
In case the problem is caused by contact oxidation, removing the plug
and re-inserting it
On 7/19/2014 11:39 AM, Barry wrote:
My question - is it better to unplug the headphones from the extension cable
when not in use, ... Or, would repeatedly plugging/unplugging it cause more
fatigue in the connection over time?
---
Sorry should have put it in an attachment but it's there it's at newegg.com
48 hrs only
73,
Fred/N0AZZ
K3 Ser #'s 6730/5299--KX3 # 2573--K2/100--KAT100
P3/SVGA--KPA500--KAT500--W2
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
They're the Sennheiser HD201S:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826106636Tpk=Sennheiser%20HD201SIsVirtualParent=1
I bought two when they were on sale for $12.99. They are incredible set
of headphones for the price. I find the reproduction pretty accurate and
not nearly as
Bummer! They only ship to continental US, Puerto Rico and APO.
Ah well, I guess I have enough sets of headphones, anyway.
UK guys, any recommendations for small, amplified, mains-driven speakers for
the KX3, please?
73 all. Dave, G3TJP
and I can snag one for
your and send it along...
With best regards,
Pete
W1PNS
- Original Message -
From: Dave Lankshear d...@lanks.plus.com
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2013 12:19:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones $11.99
Bummer! They only ship
: Monday, April 08, 2013 1:17 PM
To: Dave Lankshear
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones $11.99
Dave,
I spotted these in the accessories section of my local T-Mobile store. Might
they work? I picked up a couple on impulse, and they have great sound for
such tiny
Thanks but I left out one important fact for you, the LH radio speaker
works fine when SPKR+PH = YES, and I get both headphones and speaker
output. Part of the problem is I don't know how long it's been like
this, as I have had phones plugged in all the time, that is until this
weekend when I was
I have two K3's on the operating desk that are very similar except in
one way and I can not fine the setting or configuration to correct it.
At present both the rigs are set SPKRS+PH = NO and SPKRS = 1. This
gives me the internal speaker only when headphones are not plugged in,
and then headphones
Ron,
Have you removed the top cover to check that the speaker connector is
plugged in. If not, that is the first thing I would check.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 7/25/2011 5:26 PM, Ron N5QQ wrote:
I have two K3's on the operating desk that are very similar except in
one way and I can not fine the
Don Wilhelm wrote:
I use the same type hearing aids.
Probably not exactly the same, because Phonak is a brand name (Swiss)
offering several different models, each available with a number of
different earpieces, and then of course a vast range of programming
options.
Talk with your
over your ears and then use headphones...getting it?
73, Ed
--
Message: 24
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:31:06 +0100
From: Ian White GM3SEK gm3...@ifwtech.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
===snipped===
But over-the ear headphones
and
ATT on. Put a pillow over your ears and then use headphones...getting it?
73, Ed
--
Message: 24
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:31:06 +0100
From: Ian White GM3SEK gm3...@ifwtech.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
===snipped
On 7/12/2011 1:18 PM, Edward R. Cole wrote:
I understand your recommendations, Jim. If my hearing were better
that probably would work for me. So far, I have only shifted the Tx
equalization on my K3, leaving Rx audio shaping to be done by my
hearing aids. But I can certainly try some
...@audiosystemsgroup.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: 4e1a0532.7030...@audiosystemsgroup.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 7/10/2011 10:46 AM, Edward R. Cole wrote:
I have followed the critiques on the reflector for headset
@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones
On 7/10/2011 10:46 AM, Edward R. Cole wrote:
I have followed the critiques on the reflector for headset-boom mics
but have not bought any. Mostly the reports are on audio performance
and not comfort.
Hi Ed,
The Yamaha CM500
On 7/11/2011 7:25 AM, Kjeld Holm wrote:
The Danish company Phonak are selling a device under the name of
TVLink which plugs into the line out, Scart, headphone or
external speaker connector and from it's console sends in stereo
to your hearing aids. I have not tried it yet - so I cannot say
On 7/10/2011 11:54 PM, Edward R. Cole wrote:
I appreciate your suggestions and observations...but my hearing loss
is not just one of intensity and frequency.
Ed,
I understand your more severe hearing loss, but I was responding IN PART
to many others on the list with much less several loss
My day job is reporting and producing features for public radio. In
the studio, I use a pair of Sony 7506. I also use them for amateur
radio.
The Sonys cost about $100, and they have an extremely comfortable set
of pads that fit over the ears, which are replaceable. Although the
response
- KL7UW
--
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:25:34 +0200
From: Kjeld Holm k...@kh-translation.dk
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Headphones
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: 009401cc3fd6$65b650a0$3122f1e0$@kh-translation.dk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us
On 7/11/2011 9:15 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
Ed,
I understand your more severe hearing loss, but I was responding IN PART
to many others on the list with much less several loss than you, and can
use RXEQ to solve their own problems, at least until their hearing loss
progresses.
I appreciate this
Fred Jensen wrote:
I appreciate this thread. I too am both nearly deaf, and even with
level and frequency correction, I can't understand someone speaking
behind me. My loss occurred all at once from an RPG explosion one
night, and I've been told the rocks on your hair cells are gone so it
Ian,
I use the same type hearing aids. Talk with your audiologist.
My audiologist set a Music program for me, which does not have the
echo cancellation. I can even listen to an organ with that setting.
I do get feedback with some headphones, but I have success using the
Sony MDR series
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
