[O] bug#34684: 26.1; Strange characters when inserting date

2019-03-12 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: "Wong, Philip" > CC: "rpl...@gmail.com" , "34...@debbugs.gnu.org" > <34...@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:58:17 + > > That did the job, thanks! OK, thanks. I guess we will need to try doing this automatically at startup...

[O] bug#34684: 26.1; Strange characters when inserting date

2019-03-11 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: "Wong, Philip" > CC: "rpl...@gmail.com" , "34...@debbugs.gnu.org" > <34...@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:35:05 + > > Here is the output in the order of commands you mentioned: > <2019-03-11 ¬P´Á¤@> > > For the other commands, there is no output in the actual buff

[O] bug#34684: 26.1; Strange characters when inserting date

2019-03-11 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: "Wong, Philip" > CC: "rpl...@gmail.com" , "34...@debbugs.gnu.org" > <34...@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:55:42 + > > Thanks Eli, you're right. > > I still get '<2019-03-11 ¶g¤@>' OK, as expected. This means Org is indeed off the hook, the problem is with format

[O] bug#34684: 26.1; Strange characters when inserting date

2019-03-11 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, > RECEIVED_FROM_WINDOWS_HOST,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled > version=3.3.2 > From: "Wong, Philip" > CC: Eli Zaretskii , "34...@debbugs.gnu.org" > <34...@debbug

[O] bug#34684: 26.1; Strange characters when inserting date

2019-03-11 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: "Wong, Philip" > CC: "34...@debbugs.gnu.org" <34...@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:41:41 + > > Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by emacs -Q. > > How exactly am I supposed to run this command? Open the Windows command window that runs cmd.exe, and type "emacs -Q

[O] bug#34684: 26.1; Strange characters when inserting date

2019-03-11 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: "Wong, Philip" > CC: Eli Zaretskii , "34...@debbugs.gnu.org" > <34...@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:47:00 + > > Does the same thing OK. Can you send the list of abbreviated weekdays in your locale's language,

[O] bug#34684: 26.1; Strange characters when inserting date

2019-03-01 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Robert Pluim > Cc: philip.w...@warwick.ac.uk, 34...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 15:25:04 +0100 > > We are miscommunicating. I was demonstrating that in my setup, > org-time-stamp produces the correct output => itʼs a configuration > issue. I'm not yet sure it's a configurat

[O] bug#34684: 26.1; Strange characters when inserting date

2019-03-01 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Robert Pluim > Cc: philip.w...@warwick.ac.uk, 34...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 14:47:21 +0100 > > > That's only so if the above produces the same garbled result as in the > > original report. Does it? > > Didnʼt I send this yesterday? > > $ LANG=zh_HK src/emacs -Q -l ss.

[O] bug#34684: 26.1; Strange characters when inserting date

2019-03-01 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Robert Pluim > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 34...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 11:00:01 +0100 > > > It could be some snafu in Org, though, e.,g. if it doesn't know how to > > support that value of $LANG. In any case, should be reported to Org > &

[O] bug#34684: 26.1; Strange characters when inserting date

2019-02-28 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Robert Pluim > Cc: "Wong\, Philip" , 34...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 20:11:45 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: "Wong, Philip" > >> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:16:25 + > >> > >

[O] bug#34684: 26.1; Strange characters when inserting date

2019-02-28 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: "Wong, Philip" > Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:16:25 + > > When I insert a date by pressing CTRL+C then period then enter I get > “<2019-02-28 ¶g¥|>”. > > I’m not sure what the strange character is (¶g¥|), can someone help? Please show a complete recipe, starting from "emacs -Q", to re

[O] bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-10-22 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Goaziou > Cc: r...@gnu.org, n...@flqt.fr, r...@gnu.org, a...@gnu.org, > 32...@debbugs.gnu.org, rjhorn...@gmail.com, kaushal.m...@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:13:39 +0200 > > Some users reported that htmlfontify output is too verbose (font-style, > font-family, font

[O] bug#32906: org-in-src-block-p always returns nil

2018-10-02 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Eivind Otto Hjelle > Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:22:56 -0500 > > The function 'org-in-src-block-p' always returns nil on my system > running Windows 10. > > How to reproduce this bug starting from 'emacs -Q': > Define a function 'test-org-in-src-block-p' in the scratch buffer as > follows:

[O] bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-30 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Kyle Meyer > Cc: n...@flqt.fr, r...@gnu.org, right...@gmail.com, ras...@gmx.us, > kaushal.m...@gmail.com, 32...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 19:35:25 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Nicolas Goaziou > >> Cc: r...@gnu.org

[O] bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-29 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Goaziou > Cc: r...@gnu.org, 32...@debbugs.gnu.org, n...@flqt.fr, les...@watter.net, > right...@gmail.com, kaushal.m...@gmail.com, Rasmus > Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:33:35 +0200 > > > Thank you. Can we have this change on the ermacs-26 branch of Emacs, > > please? > > I do

[O] bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-29 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Goaziou > Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 16:53:04 +0200 > Cc: 32...@debbugs.gnu.org, n...@flqt.fr, les...@watter.net, > right...@gmail.com, > kaushal.m...@gmail.com > > > This is actually good news. It means Android MobileOrg is almost ok. > > If someone wants to do a little work

[O] bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-20 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Goaziou > Cc: Kaushal Modi , a...@gnu.org, r...@gnu.org, > n...@flqt.fr, r...@gnu.org, 32...@debbugs.gnu.org, rjhorn...@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 21:17:51 +0200 > > I assume this is the only way out of this, so I'll have a look at it. Thank you.

[O] bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-20 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Goaziou > Cc: r...@gnu.org, rjhorn...@gmail.com, n...@flqt.fr, > kaushal.m...@gmail.com, r...@gnu.org, 32...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:42:50 +0200 > > > There's also a similar reference to htmlize in the Org manual, which > > should, too, should probably be

[O] bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Kaushal Modi > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:16:28 -0400 > Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , Glenn Morris , > n...@flqt.fr, > Richard Stallman , 32...@debbugs.gnu.org, Robert Horn > , > Eli Zaretskii > > I got approval from Hrvoje Nikšić that he was fine wit

[O] bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Richard Stallman > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 21:54:30 -0400 > Cc: n...@flqt.fr, a...@gnu.org, m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr, 32...@debbugs.gnu.org, > rjhorn...@gmail.com > > Please leave the code to suggest loading htmlize deactivated. There's no such code. There's a function that, if invok

[O] bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Richard Stallman > Cc: n...@flqt.fr, rjhorn...@gmail.com, 32...@debbugs.gnu.org, > m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr, kaushal.m...@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 21:50:43 -0400 > > > If that is the crucial point, then the recent change to Org already > > took care of that, > > That de

[O] bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:14:27 +0200 > From: Robert Klein > Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , n...@flqt.fr, > kaushal.m...@gmail.com, 32...@debbugs.gnu.org, r...@gnu.org > > > From my POV, the immediate problem is to switch Org-publish from using > > htmlize to htmlfontify. Can this be done, please? >

[O] bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Richard Stallman > Cc: e...@gnu.org, n...@flqt.fr, rjhorn...@gmail.com, > 32...@debbugs.gnu.org, m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr, > kaushal.m...@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:39:49 -0400 > > > While there are numerous references > > to GitHub and SourceForge in Emacs (and s

[O] bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Goaziou > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , rjhorn...@gmail.com, n...@flqt.fr, > kaushal.m...@gmail.com, r...@gnu.org, 32...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:07:19 +0200 > > I removed htmlize URL from the error message. I also demoted the latter > to a

[O] bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Robert Horn > Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , Eli Zaretskii , > kaushal.m...@gmail.com, 32...@debbugs.gnu.org, r...@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:37:45 -0400 > > /* from RMS email later in thread > To motivate people to do this, I say we shouild not ship anothe

[O] bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Goaziou > Cc: r...@gnu.org, kaushal.m...@gmail.com, n...@flqt.fr, > 32...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:37:15 +0200 > > This is a genuine question: what /exactly/ do you want Org developers to > solve, assuming they can? Also, if they cannot, who is willing to gi

[O] bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?

2018-09-13 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Richard Stallman > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 22:55:15 -0400 > Cc: n...@flqt.fr, 32...@debbugs.gnu.org, m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr > > > >From what I remember, there is not objection to use that instead; it's > > just that someone has to work on converting ox-html to use htmlfontify > > ins

[O] bug#32068: 26.1; problem with org-agenda and categories

2018-07-07 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Goaziou > Cc: rrandr...@gmail.com, 32...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 13:05:53 +0200 > > It doesn't look like a bug. The OP may have missed > `org-agenda-time-grid' variable. > > I suggest to close this bug, if the OP doesn't object to it. Thanks. I will wait a few

[O] bug#32068: 26.1; problem with org-agenda and categories

2018-07-05 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: rrandr...@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:46:14 + > > > When evaluating the snippet below: > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > (eval-after-load "org" > '(progn > overwrite some settings > (setq org-startup-folded nil ;unfolded >

Re: [O] info URL « open at point » patch

2018-06-27 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Vincent Belaïche > CC: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" , "brandel...@gmail.com" > , "emacs-de...@gnu.org" > Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:39:33 + > > Concerning the patch, I understood that you agree with it provided that > it is upgraded to mention the change in the etc/NEWS file. So I di

Re: [O] info URL « open at point » patch

2018-06-26 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Vincent Belaïche > CC: "emacs-de...@gnu.org" > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:47:04 + > > My point is that for a modular design, the same package that provides > the browse-url function, should also provide some match-url-at-point-p > predicate, e.g. There is such a function: browse-url-

Re: [O] info URL « open at point » patch

2018-06-26 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Vincent Belaïche > CC: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:19:32 + > > Just to be factual: > 1) Does anybody objects the patch as it is --- if not I would push it to the > repo ? It needs to be called out in NEWS. > 2) Does anybody agrees that the coding of Info-ge

Re: [O] info URL « open at point » patch

2018-06-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Vincent Belaïche > CC: "emacs-de...@gnu.org" , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" > > Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 20:34:26 + > > I agree it is a bit strange, but the reason for it is simple : I would > like a single entry point for all the manuals installed on my PC, so > that my old and tired

Re: [O] info URL « open at point » patch

2018-06-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Vincent Belaïche > CC: "emacs-de...@gnu.org" , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" > > Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 18:21:20 + > > What I want to do is to refer an HTML or PDF document from an Info document. > So > I want the info browser to launch the web browser for it to open a > « file: »

Re: [O] info URL « open at point » patch

2018-06-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Vincent Belaïche > CC: "emacs-de...@gnu.org" , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" > > Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 16:48:30 + > > To my understanding @xref works only for info links (node names or anchors, > or qualified thereof where the > qualificator is the info document name) --- maybe I a

Re: [O] info URL « open at point » patch

2018-06-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Vincent Belaïche > Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 06:57:53 + > > I am writing to both Emacs-devel and org-mode list because this concerns > browsing URL, and Org-mode already has quite some stuff on this. > Recently I came across this that in an Info file a « file: » protocol > URL is not ope

Re: [O] Use Emacs' default value of "bidi-paragraph-direction" in orgmode

2018-06-17 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: ST > Cc: m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr, Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 19:47:31 +0300 > > > I agree with (1) and (2), but your conclusion doesn't follow from > > that. The value nil means that the base directionality of > > _each_paragraph_ is determined dynamically. It does NO

Re: [O] Use Emacs' default value of "bidi-paragraph-direction" in orgmode

2018-06-17 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: ST > Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 15:29:58 +0300 > > 1. Do you agree that the vast majority of all the documents in human > history were/are EITHER ltr OR rtl? Meaning that mixed ltr/rtl texts are > minority that we should not take care of... > 2. D

Re: [O] Use Emacs' default value of "bidi-paragraph-direction" in orgmode

2018-06-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Goaziou > Cc: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:05:37 +0200 > > ST writes: > > > Please leave the Emacs' default value of "bidi-paragraph-direction" > > which is "nil" in orgmode as well. Right now orgmode seems to force > > "left-to-right", thus blocking "right-

Re: [O] 3 manuals fail to export to PO (gnus, idlwave, org)

2018-04-15 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary > Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 21:33:18 +0900 > > 3 manuals distributed with emacs fail to export to po format when using the > following command: > > po4a-gettextize -f texinfo -M utf8 -m name.texi -p name.texi.fr.po > > gnus.texi > > Use of uninitialized value $newf

[O] bug#28806: syntax highlighting in ox-odt and emacs26+ broken

2018-02-09 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: pierre.techouey...@free.fr (Pierre Téchoueyres) > Cc: Jay Kamat , 28...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:03:31 +0100 > > > Having read all of the references and discussions you've provided, I > > see no evidence that this is an Emacs issue, as opposed to an Org > > issue. I th

[O] bug#29885: 25.3; org-mode table messing up!

2018-01-03 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Rahul Juliato > Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 01:10:26 -0200 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 29...@debbugs.gnu.org > > Solved. > > Apparently I had an org installation folder inside ~/.emacs.d, other then my > distribution provided (since > org-mode is part of the emacs pack

[O] bug#29885: 25.3; org-mode table messing up!

2017-12-29 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: rahuljuli...@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 22:23:59 -0200 > > Starting from emacs -Q, table TABs are ok and does the job. > > But if I start with emacs (even without a .emacs file), i get something > like: > > Table: > > | a | a | a | a | a | a | > | | | | | | | >

[O] bug#11700: 24.1.50; Bad interaction between BiDi and org-tables

2017-12-23 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 15:38:11 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: dov.grobg...@gmail.com, 11...@debbugs.gnu.org > > I found both methods doing well, so I'm going to show both, and let > you decide which one is better. On second thought, I think Method 2 is better, becau

[O] bug#11700: 24.1.50; Bad interaction between BiDi and org-tables

2017-12-23 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Goaziou > Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:08:57 +0100 > Cc: dov.grobg...@gmail.com, 11...@debbugs.gnu.org > > For tests, we use `org-test-with-temp-text' macro, e.g., > > (org-test-with-temp-text "| a | b |\n| c | d |" > ... do something in that buffer ...) You didn't say that t

Re: [O] Emacs sagmentation fault error on a big org-mode file movement

2017-12-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: "numbch...@gmail.com" > Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 12:27:58 +0800 > > Is there a way to debug this? Run Emacs under a debugger, trigger the crash, and produce a more helpful backtrace by typing the "bt" command at GDB prompt. Please report all of that to the Emacs issue tracker using the co

[O] bug#11700: 24.1.50; Bad interaction between BiDi and org-tables

2017-12-08 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Goaziou > Cc: dov.grobg...@gmail.com, 11...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:02:00 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Such tests can only be run interactively, because bidi reordering is a > > display-time feature in Emacs. Is

[O] bug#11700: 24.1.50; Bad interaction between BiDi and org-tables

2017-12-04 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:43:12 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr, 11...@debbugs.gnu.org > > Yes, Emacs implements Unicode 9.0, including the UBA with isolates. Actually, the current development sources and the upcoming Emacs 26.1 already support Unicode 10.0.

[O] bug#11700: 24.1.50; Bad interaction between BiDi and org-tables

2017-12-04 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Goaziou > Cc: Dov Grobgeld , 11...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 21:27:53 +0100 > > I'd rather preserve structure of Org documents outside of Emacs. So, > `:align-to' is not an option. > > IIUC, I need to replace the closest space from vertical bars with > > #("

[O] bug#11700: 24.1.50; Bad interaction between BiDi and org-tables

2017-12-04 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Dov Grobgeld > Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 21:35:40 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 11...@debbugs.gnu.org > > The correct Unicode≥6.3 way to do this would be with the unicode isolation > characters. I.e. you would wrap > each of the columns with column contents. Does em

Re: [O] keybindings again...

2017-06-29 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary > Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:10:50 +0900 > > Do you mean that Shift is not recognized as a modified key by the terminal ? No, that's not it. The problem is that on a TTY, the way Emacs reads keyboard input returns only characters, it doesn't return function keys.

Re: [O] emacs vs emacs -nw

2017-05-31 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary > Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 19:41:00 +0900 > Cc: Org-mode > > Ok, I just tried something else: > > (setq ns-function-modifier 'meta) and what I get is *very* similar to the > issue I have with ESC: > > FN-x correctly "calls" M-x > FN-left in a level 2 header in or

Re: [O] Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch?

2017-02-12 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: John Wiegley > Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 18:46:09 -0800 > Cc: Bastien Guerry , Emacs developers , > Phillip Lord , > emacs-org list , > Kaushal Modi > > I hear your other points, so I'm curious now as to what more people think > about this who work on Emacs core: Do you wa

Re: [O] Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch?

2017-02-05 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Edward John Steere > Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 11:03:31 +0200 > Cc: Bastien Guerry , Emacs developers , > Phillip Lord , > emacs-org list , > Kaushal Modi > > > It's not like packages communicate with Emacs over a well > > defined RESTful interface. In other words: CEDET a

Re: [O] Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch?

2017-02-02 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: David Engster > Cc: emacs-de...@gnu.org, b...@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, > kaushal.m...@gmail.com, la...@gnus.org, phillip.l...@russet.org.uk > Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 21:57:02 +0100 > > > Ask the package maintainers, they see significant advantages in being > > able to release

Re: [O] Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch?

2017-02-02 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: David Engster > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , b...@gnu.org, emacs-de...@gnu.org, > phillip.l...@russet.org.uk, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, kaushal.m...@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 18:47:49 +0100 > > > I believe the intent is to make it so that checking out and building > > Emacs also ch

Re: [O] Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch?

2017-02-02 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 13:10:07 +0100 > Cc: Bastien Guerry , Emacs developers , > Phillip Lord , > emacs-org list , > Kaushal Modi > > If Django had traditionally always been distributed along with Python, > and maintained in the Python repo, and the

Re: [O] Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch?

2017-01-26 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Kaushal Modi > Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:01:24 + > Cc: emacs-org list , > Stefan Monnier , > Rasmus , Emacs developers > > I don't believe that the target date has yet been set for releasing 26.1. We > are currently on the release > candidate testing stage of 25.2. So I

Re: [O] Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch?

2017-01-25 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Rasmus > Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:54:48 +0100 > Cc: emacs-de...@gnu.org > > What is the current status? I am a bit confused about the policy at this > point. I'm happy to try to update master to 9.0.4, but I was somehow > under the impression that we were waiting for a solution to incl

[O] bug#25487: 26.0.50; org-table-align doesn't work with different face sizes in row

2017-01-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Ryan McCarl > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:26:29 -0700 > >   > (1) Define the faces org-table and org-link with a fixed-width font > (Inconsolata in > my case) so table alignment should normally work. > (2) Define the scale of the org-link face to 0.9 and the scale of the > org-table face to

Re: [O] bug#24073: 25.1-rc2

2016-09-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
Ping! Bastien, could you or someone else please look into this and provide your comments? TIA. > From: Paul Rankin > Cc: 24...@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 14:38:55 +1000 > > Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:25 +0300: > > > From:

[O] bug#23917: 25.0.95; commit 3a9d6296b35e5317c497674d5725eb52699bd3b8 causing org-capture to error out

2016-07-23 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: nljlistb...@gmail.com (N. Jackson) > Cc: 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , > jwieg...@gmail.com, rpl...@gmail.com, monn...@iro.umontreal.ca, > alex.ben...@linaro.org > Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 21:42:08 -0300 > > Both the v2 and the v3 patch work for me wit

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-21 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: npost...@users.sourceforge.net > Cc: 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, nljlistb...@gmail.com, jwieg...@gmail.com, > rpl...@gmail.com, monn...@iro.umontreal.ca, alex.ben...@linaro.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:08:43 -0400 > > I made the same adjustments to the saved sub_start and sub_end > var

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-21 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: npost...@users.sourceforge.net > Cc: 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, nljlistb...@gmail.com, jwieg...@gmail.com, > rpl...@gmail.com, monn...@iro.umontreal.ca, alex.ben...@linaro.org > Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 23:00:59 -0400 > > > Please also make sure bug#23869 is still fixed after this. > > Fo

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-20 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: npost...@users.sourceforge.net > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, > nljlistb...@gmail.com, jwieg...@gmail.com, rpl...@gmail.com, > alex.ben...@linaro.org > Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 20:56:28 -0400 > > >> Maybe there's a misunderstanding.

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-20 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: rpl...@gmail.com, 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, alex.ben...@linaro.org, > jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com, npost...@users.sourceforge.net > Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:19:59 -0400 > > > Is it OK to adjust the match data before actually making the > > replacemen

[O] bug#23917: bug#23917: bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-20 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Alex Bennée > Cc: 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, rpl...@gmail.com, jwieg...@gmail.com, > monn...@iro.umontreal.ca, nljlistb...@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:48:45 +0100 > > So is the match data already out of sync by the time the > save-match-data call is made? Yes.

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-20 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: rpl...@gmail.com, 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, alex.ben...@linaro.org, > jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:50:07 -0400 > > > Do we care that using save-match-data in every call to replace-match > > might mean a performance hit? > >

[O] bug#23917: bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Alex Bennée > Cc: monn...@iro.umontreal.ca, 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, rpl...@gmail.com, > jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com, m...@lunaryorn.com > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:45:44 +0100 > > ;; Save and restore the match data, as recommended in (elisp)Change Hooks > (save-match-dat

[O] bug#23917: bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Alex Bennée > Cc: Stefan Monnier , 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, > rpl...@gmail.com, jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:05:37 +0100 > > > Do we care that using save-match-data in every call to replace-match > > might mean a performance hit? If it will, then t

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: rpl...@gmail.com, 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, alex.ben...@linaro.org, > jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:03:51 -0400 > > I guess the next best thing is: > - copy search_regs.start and search_regs.end before calling replace_range. >

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: rpl...@gmail.com, 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, alex.ben...@linaro.org, > jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:48:19 -0400 > > > The more general problem is when there's at least one more > > sub-expression, whose start and/or end are af

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Robert Pluim , 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, > alex.ben...@linaro.org, jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:58:35 -0400 > > > I think this change performed by save-match-data is harmless: the old > > value (62) was not valid any more any

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Robert Pluim , 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, > alex.ben...@linaro.org, jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:58:35 -0400 > > > In the case in point, a single character at EOB (= 62) was deleted, > > which made EOB be 61, one less than its

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: John Wiegley > Cc: Robert Pluim , Stefan Monnier > , 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, alex.ben...@linaro.org, > nljlistb...@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:04:11 -0700 > > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > My suggestion to fix this is

[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks)

2016-07-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Robert Pluim > CC: 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, Alex Bennée > , jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:24:59 +0200 > > (I'm moving this discussion to the bug, let me know if that's not OK) Thanks. > Make sure that you have org-20160704 from elpa. > > # emacs -

[O] bug#23917: 25.0.95; commit 3a9d6296b35e5317c497674d5725eb52699bd3b8 causing org-capture to error out

2016-07-15 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 20:03:35 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 23...@debbugs.gnu.org > > > which already does save-match-data. If I globally disable the org > > element cache by (setq org-element-use-cache nil) the issue > > disappears, so now I'm confus

[O] bug#23917: 25.0.95; commit 3a9d6296b35e5317c497674d5725eb52699bd3b8 causing org-capture to error out

2016-07-08 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Robert Pluim > Cc: 23...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 17:40:42 +0200 > > org-element--cache-after-change is: > > (defun org-element--cache-after-change (beg end pre) > "Update buffer modifications for current buffer. > BEG and END are the beginning and end of the range of c

[O] bug#23890: 25.0.94; Org-mode Table does not copy time interval correctly

2016-07-04 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Rares Vernica , 23...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 12:30:48 -0400 > > (Isn't it weird to have a component of Emacs for which we effectively > don't accept bug reports?) It is. But as long as the Org maintainers are rare guests here, I see no other way.

Re: [O] flycheck orgmode on windows invalid output file name

2016-06-06 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Guido Van Hoecke > Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 08:43:00 +0200 > Cc: help-gnu-emacs , orgmode > > >> Still, when editing elisp blocks from my elisp.org files, I keep > >> hitting the '*' problem... > > > > What is "the '*' problem", exactly? > > > Filenames with '*'. But I thought my suggested

Re: [O] flycheck orgmode on windows invalid output file name

2016-06-05 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Guido Van Hoecke > Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:41:18 +0200 > Cc: help-gnu-emacs , orgmode > > For testing i went to change flycheck-temp-file-system in flycheck.el > so that it reads > > (setq tempfile (convert-standard-filename (expand-file-name > (file-name-nondirectory filename) >

Re: [O] flycheck orgmode on windows invalid output file name

2016-06-05 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Guido Van Hoecke > Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 12:45:45 +0200 > > Error while checking syntax automatically: (file-error "Opening output file" > "Invalid argument" > "c:/Users/guivh/emacs-guivho/.flycheck_emacs-guivho.org[*Org Src > emacs-guivho.org[ emacs-lisp ]*]") > > I checked the wind

[O] bug#22734: 24.5; do not leave opened org-agenda-files on org-agenda-list, etc.

2016-02-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Oleksandr Gavenko > Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:23:05 +0200 > > In GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.18.2) > of 2015-10-24 on trouble, modified by Debian > Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11702000 > System Description: Debian GNU/Linu

[O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

2015-11-03 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Emanuel Evans > Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:14:33 -0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Are you sure this isn't a problem with Org mode? If not, can you tell > > why you think so? > > Oh, I think it could definitely be a problem with Org mode, I

[O] bug#19887: 24.4; Cannot kill buffer; Wrong type argument: overlayp, nil

2015-02-20 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nicolas Richard > Cc: Damian Nadales , 19...@debbugs.gnu.org, Nicolas > Goaziou > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:20:15 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> From: Damian Nadales > >> That's weird. Which buffer are you killing, the Org buffer, or

[O] bug#19887: 24.4; Cannot kill buffer; Wrong type argument: overlayp, nil

2015-02-20 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Damian Nadales > CC: "19...@debbugs.gnu.org" <19...@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:32:12 + > > > I cannot reproduce this. I tried both Emacs 24.4 and the pretest of 24.5. > > In > > both cases, Emacs asks me whether to kill a buffer that is modified, and > > once > >

[O] bug#19887: 24.4; Cannot kill buffer; Wrong type argument: overlayp, nil

2015-02-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Damian Nadales > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:04:54 + > > Running Emacs 24.4, compiled from source I found I cannot kill a buffer when > performing these steps: > > - Run emacs –Q > > - Create an org-mode file (i.e. ``myorgfile.org``) > > - Insert the following text: > > o #+BEGIN_SR

[O] bug#19606: 24.4; Emacs hangs when editing a 5-line Org file

2015-01-31 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Fabrice Niessen > Cc: dgu...@yandex.ru, 19...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:07:13 +0100 > > (gdb) thread 1 > [Switching to thread 1 (Thread 8340.0x2568)] > #0 0x01101915 in XSTRING (a=168379948) at C:/emacs/repo/src/lisp.h:974 > (gdb) 974 C:/emacs/repo/src/lisp.h: No

[O] bug#19606: 24.4; Emacs hangs when editing a 5-line Org file

2015-01-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Fabrice Niessen > Cc: dgu...@yandex.ru, 19...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:31:38 +0100 > > > Looks like an infloop due to display or overlay strings with text > > properties. Can you reproduce this in an unoptimized build? > > Sure, if you can point me to such a version

[O] bug#19606: 24.4; Emacs hangs when editing a 5-line Org file

2015-01-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Fabrice Niessen > Cc: dgu...@yandex.ru, 19...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 13:04:00 +0100 > > (gdb) thread 1 > [Switching to thread 1 (Thread 17252.0x44f0)] > #0 0x01142191 in Fnext_single_property_change (position=position@entry=540, > prop=62947906, object=118795585, l

[O] bug#19606: 24.4; Emacs hangs when editing a 5-line Org file

2015-01-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Fabrice Niessen > Cc: 19...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:27:16 +0100 > > OK, so I just reproduced the problem once again, then: > > - tried to C-g in Emacs: impossible! > - launched GDB > - source ~/.gdbinit > - thread 1 > - thread apply all backtrace > > Still, the backt

[O] bug#19606: 24.4; Emacs hangs when editing a 5-line Org file

2015-01-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Fabrice Niessen > Cc: 19...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:16:26 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> From: Glenn Morris > >> Cc: Fabrice Niessen , 19...@debbugs.gnu.org > >> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:37:36 -0500 > >> >

[O] bug#19606: 24.4; Emacs hangs when editing a 5-line Org file

2015-01-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Fabrice Niessen , 19...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:37:36 -0500 > > > I just want to note that there seems to be a tendency to try and use gdb > to debug Org problems, when debug-on-quit and ctrl-g might work. Very true.

[O] bug#19606: 24.4; Emacs hangs when editing a 5-line Org file

2015-01-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:06:58 +0300 > From: Dmitry Gutov > CC: 19...@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 01/15/2015 09:14 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > But you didn't even show the backtrace from the main (a.k.a. "Lisp") > > thread. Your backtrace

[O] bug#19606: 24.4; Emacs hangs when editing a 5-line Org file

2015-01-15 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Fabrice Niessen > Cc: 19...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:04:13 +0100 > > > Thanks, but what do you expect us to do with this report, without any > > information whatsoever regarding your customizations? > > I thought that, thanks to the backtrace, you could find the culpri

[O] bug#18785: 24.4.1; Emacs hangs with Org mode when point is in LOGBOOK

2014-11-26 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Sebastien Vauban , 18...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:53:03 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> "sp-show--pair-function" (0x88f14c) > [...] > > Maybe. This backtrace looks very different from t

[O] bug#18785: 24.4.1; Emacs hangs with Org mode when point is in LOGBOOK

2014-11-26 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Sebastien Vauban > Cc: 18...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:11:31 +0100 > > Lisp Backtrace: > "line-end-position" (0x88ccb0) > "back-to-indentation" (0x88cdf8) > "current-left-margin" (0x88cf60) > "move-to-left-margin" (0x88d0b8) > 0x126b2a8 PVEC_COMPILED > "funcall" (0x88d22

[O] bug#19141: Emacs 24.4: ShellExecute fails in one case under Windows 7

2014-11-25 Thread Eli Zaretskii
Adding Bastien to the addressees, as this is at least somewhat related to Org and its maintenance procedures. > From: AW > Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:30:10 +0100 > > What works: > > [[fuu:baz.pdf]] - a link to a local file, which has to be opened in a pdf > viewer, using an abbrevation for the p

[O] bug#18785: 24.4.1; Emacs hangs with Org mode when point is in LOGBOOK

2014-10-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 22:35:59 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 18...@debbugs.gnu.org > > > (gdb) xbacktrace > > [Thread 8300.0x2b00 exited with code 0] > > (gdb) No symbol "DATA_SEG_BITS" in current context. > > ? If so, please upgrade to a n

[O] bug#18785: 24.4.1; Emacs hangs with Org mode when point is in LOGBOOK

2014-10-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Sebastien Vauban > Cc: 18...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 21:10:49 +0200 > > > Thanks. What happens if you type "xbacktrace"? (You might need to > > type "source /path/to/.gdbinit" before that, to get the xbacktrace > > command defined.) > > It seems to fail? You mean, thi

<    1   2   3   >