2012/4/25 Michael Haberler :
> Unsure how to adress this: Jogging assumes free mode.
>
> during the 'jog while paused' thing I posted yesterday motion is in
> coordinated mode, so jogging normally wouldnt work.
>
> to make it work, I see the following options:
>
> 1. just jog in cartesian space (a
I have scratched myhead some more, this is my take on the user / operator
side of things . . . .
(And to me this is the bottom line, although it might not produce elegant
code)
Jogging in joint mode would only be used in practice to move off a physical
limit condition. Like a hardware switch or wh
Am 25.04.2012 um 12:43 schrieb andy pugh:
> On 25 April 2012 07:36, Michael Haberler wrote:
>
>> 2) assumes forward kins is available which might not be the case.
>
> What are the other limitations of an inverse-only kins machine?
I wish I fully understood; there's a bit of comment in src/emc
On 25 April 2012 07:36, Michael Haberler wrote:
> 2) assumes forward kins is available which might not be the case.
What are the other limitations of an inverse-only kins machine? Is it
reasonable to say that such machines simply aren't allowed to jog in
retract mode?
--
atp
The idea that ther
practical consideration:
When milling or turning, if I pause to do 'something' I would want to be
able to retract the tool in the direction of the tool axis
so no damage is done to the tool or the workpiece.
Normally on a 3 axis machine joint mode = coordinatemode as far as jogging
goes, so there
Unsure how to adress this: Jogging assumes free mode.
during the 'jog while paused' thing I posted yesterday motion is in coordinated
mode, so jogging normally wouldnt work.
to make it work, I see the following options:
1. just jog in cartesian space (any obvious reason why this shouldnt be
po
