Dear experts,
Anyone who knowes about the requirements for MEPS for Australia and New
Zealand for a external power supply?
Forv example:
- When is it mandatory?
- Valid for all Power supplies?
- Marking needed?
- Briefly the requirements?
- Only marking requirements of status enough?
- When is it mandatory?
*Targeting dates from 1st December 2008 in Australia and 1st April 2009 in
New Zealand
- Valid for all Power supplies?
*External power supplies
- Marking needed?
*Energy Efficiency III requirements mandatory, IV optional
- Briefly the requirements?
Anders,
Take a look at following:
http://www.energyrating.gov.au/reg.html
and
www.energyrating.gov.au/library/pubs/2008-factsheet-eps.pdf
http://www.energyrating.gov.au/library/pubs/2008-factsheet-eps.pdf
Kind regards,
Kris Carpentier
Regulatory Approvals
Hello...
I need to CB EMC Test report sample
please reply to me...
http://intra.eri.re.kr/mail/recv_chec
.aspx?suid=S-08111810292833A0D4CA-37768
6.emluid=R0%23081118102928%23emc-pstc%40ieee.org%231
Greetings Experts.
This should be an easy one for those who know the answer.
What is the deal with Wire Nuts? Where can be they be used, where can’t
they be used? Are there different rules for permanently mounted equipment
verse portable equipment? Do you have to also use a mechanical
Members,
I am looking for what products need the CCC-S mark for China?
Any guidance is appreciated.
TI manufactures battery (AAA) powered Calculators.
W. Richard Gartman, MS, CSP
Product Stewardship Manager
Texas Instruments, Education Technology
7800 Banner Drive, Dallas, Tx 75251
Worldly Experts,
I am having a problem with a product meeting FCC Class A conducted limit at
13.56 MHz due to radiated signal from internal RFID unit coupling into AC
supply conductors.
The host product complies with Class A limits without RFID module
transmitting. RFID has FCC modular
In looking over some information for a customer, I came back to the IEC’s
IECEE section of their website.
“The fundamental principle of the CB Scheme is that a manufacturer can
obtain a CB Test Certificate for a defined product, from a national
certification body (NCB). The manufacturer can then
Only the CE mark is mandatory in the EU. All other marks (for
equipment covered by the CE marking directives, at least) are
optional, but they can have market advantages and assist with product
liability insurance.
In the days before the CE mark, some EU countries required vendors of
Hi Bob,
If your product utilizes a detachable antenna, a dummy load may replace the
antenna per ANSI C63.4 (13.1.3.1). The term “detachable” in this standard
is not defined, so is left to interpretation. Technically speaking, if an
antenna internally or externally connects to a transmitter via
Is there a listing anywhere of countries that officially accept
CB-scheme reports in lieu of local testing? The key being officially.
-Doug
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Nick
Williams
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 10:16 AM
To: Doug Kramer
Cc:
Hello Brian,
Off hand, I am unaware of anything preventing the use of a twist-on wire
connector in portable equipment, but that doesn’t mean that the prohibition
doesn’t exist. Other list members may know of specific cases where the
connectors are prohibited. However, the description of the
Click on any country in the list to see the NCBs that test to the CB scheme.
These NCBs should also accept a CB report from another agency.
http://members.iecee.org/
Ted Eckert
Compliance Engineer
Microsoft Corporation
ted.eck...@microsoft.com
The opinions expressed are my own and do not
Hi Brian,
When I worked for UL, I had heard that the use of wire nuts was not acceptable
for the EU (CE Marking), but I don’t recall ever seeing the source of this
alleged requirement. I have a vague recollection about them not having any
type of international certifications, but I’m not sure
It is not a redundant captive device.
Scott
--- On Mon, 11/17/08, Aldous, Scott scott.ald...@aei.com wrote:
From: Aldous, Scott scott.ald...@aei.com
Subject: RE: What's the deal with Wire Nuts?
To: Ted Eckert ted.eck...@microsoft.com, Kunde, Brian
What approvals does this other equipment purport to have?
Chris
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Kunde, Brian
Sent: 17 November 2008 14:18
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: What's the deal with Wire Nuts?
Greetings
The CB scheme is essentially a club for test houses, not a formal
nation-state level accreditation or mutual recognition agreement.
Hence, you need to see if there is a test house whose certification
is acceptable to the country whose certification requirements you are
trying to meet and
Bob -
It is acceptable to replace antenna with a dummy load for this radio type
(13.56MHz, Part 15) for the measurement of the conducted emissions at the
transmit frequency of the radio. This may not be done for the AC conducted
emission measurement at other frequencies. The relevant Knowledge
Brian,
In my experience, electrical inspectors do not like to see twist-on wire
connectors used in equipment due to the perceived potential for them to
vibrate loose, usually because they were incorrectly installed in the first
place. Some inspectors will insist that they be over-wrapped with
To all,
The FCC is in the process of imposing HAC requirements for digital wireless
phones. I am asking those intimately knowledgeable with that process if this
requirement would also apply to specific B2B products that also include
digital wireless phone capability?
I am asking this group
In message
7995b996909d2a40b3cb7d0db4cceaa90273d...@aedcexcvs1.aei.com, dated
Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Aldous, Scott scott.ald...@aei.com writes:
On page 119, that book indicates that ?U.S. wire-nuts are not permitted
for wire connections.? I don?t believe the source of this statement is
provided,
In message
79b6babf7ce2914591e1c45c7ed086fa0c9...@chiefwiggum.nceelabs.org, dated
Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Doug Kramer dkra...@nceelabs.com writes:
I thought that manufacturers testing using harmonized standards (when
available) was a correct route to demonstrating compliance to the EU
directives
In message p06240801c54745eb0ba4@[192.168.1.60], dated Mon, 17 Nov
2008, Nick Williams nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk writes:
and to a large extent avoid having to working with unknown quantities
on the other side of the plant.
..such as Marketing and Finance? (;-)
--
OOO - Own Opinions
In message
9d3c09c155d9904299b427d6d2b1bf9702b2d...@int-ev1.corpnet.intermec.com,
dated Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Pickard, Ron ron.pick...@intermec.com
writes:
The FCC is in the process of imposing HAC requirements for digital
wireless phones. I am asking those intimately knowledgeable with that
Where does the term, “Redundant Captive Device” come from?
The device which has the wire nuts (twist-on wire connectors) is a water
chiller used as a peripheral for a piece of laboratory equipment to be sold
internationally. The manufacturer is not used to making laboratory equipment,
but
Hello Other Brian,
That is a term I have heard from years gone by.
A standard does not specifically prohibit them however if you look at IEC
60950 para 3.1.9 it would be difficult to use wire nut that met the
requirements of two independent fixings. Most EU standards have a similar
discription
Scott,
Does the 60950 standard give examples of what would satisfy the “two
independent fixings” requirement? How would a terminal block satisfy this?
I have heard that a wire nut can be used for the electrical connection, but
you have to also mechanically hold the wires together which
Ron,
In general, the labhelp address at the FCC should be used for questions - I
know they generally resist answering questions addressed to individuals. If
you've used this without a response, the specific answer must still be under
discussion. If this is for a handheld mobile computer that
My understanding is that some power supply battery chargers are exempt and
power supplies with multiple outputs are also exempt.
Regards
Barry Esmore
AUS-TICK
281 Lawrence Rd
Mount Waverley
Vic 3149
Australia
Ph: +613 9886 1345
Fax: +613 9013 9552
- Original Message -
29 matches
Mail list logo
