Hi All,
I am trying to confirm my understanding of the correct path for creating
DoCs for hosts and USB radio modules under RED.
In our case, we make a few LTE USB modems that are specifically for use
with our full range of branch and mobile routers. (i.e. the form factor is
one designed to
Forwarding for Mark Luksich at gogo...
gogo Commercial Aviation has a job opening for an International RF
Regulatory Engineer.
*Key Responsibilities:*
- Working with regulatory and/or legal staff, analyze rules and
regulations to determine technical compliance requirements for licensing
Forwarding for Mark Luksich at gogo...
gogo Commercial Aviation has a job opening for an International RF
Regulatory Engineer.
*Key Responsibilities:*
- Working with regulatory and/or legal staff, analyze rules and
regulations to determine technical compliance requirements for licensing
Charlie Blackham just pointed me to EN 301 489-52 - so now I know.
Nevermind!
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Dave Heald <emcp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for that clarification - I suppose this might explain why there are
> nof RED updates for EN 301 489-7/-24, but I am of co
Hi Jamison,
If you have SAP, presumably you might have a PLM tool like Agile PLM or
some other tool that manages Bills of Material.
I developed a system a while ago that created a sub-BOM of 'fake' items to
capture and track regulatory status.
The top-level sub-BOM was for the
Thanks for that clarification - I suppose this might explain why there are
nof RED updates for EN 301 489-7/-24, but I am of course curious if there
is more to it (such as if these 2G/3G/LTE EMC standards have migrated to a
new standard).
Thanks & Best Regards,
-David
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:00
Hi All,
I have been tracking the standards activity for the RED transition, and
there are two troubling standards for cellular EMC that do not appear to
have new versions in process.
These are the EN 301 489-7 (GSM) and 301 489-24 (3G/LTE) EMC immunity
standards.
Does anyone know if these
: [PSES] Updating EU ErP reports for Level VI adapters?
>
>
>
> I would say that the limits are being exceeded, hence a manufactures
> technical letter of explanation in support of your DoC is sufficient ! No
> test required. Test data must be available though to support your technical
Posting for David Petry of Sonos.
Sonos has job openings for a Lead Compliance Engineer and for RF engineers.
Please contact Sonos.com or David Petry for more details
*Company Sonos Inc.*
*Job title: Lead Compliance Engineer *
The Compliance Engineer is responsible for making sure that all
(apologies if this is a re-post - it's not showing on my mail.google.com
inbox, so I'm assuming it didn't go through the first time around)
All,
Do you think it's necessary to update EU ErP reports when transitioning
from a Level V to a Level VI adapter? Or would an explanatory statement
All,
Do you think it's necessary to update EU ErP reports when transitioning
from a Level V to a Level VI adapter? Or would an explanatory statement
suffice?
Technically our products are HiNA anyway, so that further reduces our
compliance burden, but I'd like to try to explain this away in my
All,
Do you think it's necessary to update EU ErP reports when transitioning
from a Level V to a Level VI adapter? Or would an explanatory statement
suffice?
Technically our products are HiNA anyway, so that further reduces our
compliance burden, but I'd like to try to explain this away in my
Thanks, all, for the good discussion on this. I considered everything here
think I've got a good path forward.
Best Regards,
-David
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:24 AM, John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk wrote:
In message 54573abb74734ea78f208b754d51b...@thhste15d1be4.hs20.net,
dated Tue, 21
this is to compliance assessment.
Thanks,
-David
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
wrote:
In message
ca+nn315eg5krv5rgtjbmfqbhkancteqsbuwjkhobpopurog...@mail.gmail.com,
dated Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Dave Heald emcp...@gmail.com writes:
Even though the EN 301 489-1 standard's
I have a technical question on the OJ vs References in standards.
Here is the conflict: EN 301 489 -1 V1.9.2 is the current standard in
the RTTE OJ.
However, 301 489-1 V 1.9.2, it lists several specific standards in it's
Normative References chapter... and one of these standards (EN 55022: 2006
Hi All,
My company is looking for an in-country representative / cert holder for
Australia for WiFi/Cellular converged mobile devices.
Can anyone provide a recommendation?
Thanks, and Best Regards,
-David Heald
-
This message is
to check be sure.
Thanks,
-Dave Heald
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings
Hi,
If you want to use the USB logo or other trademark, you will need to be
USB standards compliant, and I believe there is a limit to output current
in this case. There may be other requirements there also that would guide
the scope of your design.
Best Regards,
-Dave Heald
On Mon, May 27
.
I'll admit I haven't had to deal with the exact equipment types you're
describing, but the problem on a higher level sounds like something I'm all
too familiar with.
Best Regards,
-Dave Heald
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Kunde, Brian brian_ku...@lecotc.com wrote:
More trouble in the world
has been 1-2 months from the date of submission.
I don't know the line voltage in Thailand off hand, but Google should be
able to answer that quickly.
Best Regards,
-Dave Heald
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:50 PM, FW Miller f_w_mil...@yahoo.com wrote:
emc-p...@ieee.orghttp://us.mc1617
. Also check the Recognized Adapter and
Certified Adapter tabs of the Excel spreadsheet.
Best Regards,
-Dave Heald
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Moshe Henig moshe.he...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear group,
Can you plrease advice I was asked to find IEEE requirements for
ATT Power Supplies
such that the system cannot function as intended and a safety risk is
present.
Needless to say, when I need a replacement lithium battery, I gladly pay
the extra to get an authentic battery from the manufacturer.
Best Regards,
-Dave Heald
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:32 AM, ralph.mcdiar...@schneider
(at
least here in the states), so any remaining out-of-band emissions coming
off of the AP's antenna should be low enough to have no impact on pass/fail
of the EUT itself.
Best Regards,
-Dave Heald
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Pawson, James james.paw...@echostar.comwrote:
Hello list members
and Best Regards,
-Dave Heald
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived
/emc_guide__updated_20100208_v3_en.pdf
Best Regards,
-Dave Heald
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:01 PM, kevin.mccandl...@schneider-electric.comwrote:
Hello List Members,
** **
I am forwarding a question I got from a new business partner in the UK.
Since my experience is with stand-alone controllers, I didn’t want
expected apparati, but apparently that's not the plural form)
Thanks in advance, and Best Regards,
-Dave Heald
Note the best information about the device suggest that it is not subject
to any more specific EMC content containing directive such as RTTE,
Medical Device, Marine, etc
should check with a CATL for the most recent status. If you
need contact info, I can provide a few names offline.
Best Regards,
-Dave Heald
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Charlie Blackham
char...@sulisconsultants.com wrote:
Group.
** **
I have a typical Li-Ion 3.7V 1.4 Ah mobile
-00920-00-00-tra-00_en.pdf
Best Regards,
-Dave Heald
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:01 PM, McInturff, Gary
gary.mcintu...@esterline.com wrote:
Knowing there are directives for EMC, Safety, and RoHS compliance I am a
bit uncertain what to do with a subassembly which is in itself incomplete
and I am trying to resolve the issue.
Thanks in advance!
-Dave Heald
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web
) the device is HAC
compliant for all other interfaces in the product (e.g. GSM/UMTS). 2) the
labeling must disclose that the device has not been rated for WiFi usage.
Best Regards,
-Dave Heald
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Pickard, Ron ron.pick...@intermec.com
wrote:
To all
line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com
Dave Heald: davehe...@attbi.com
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
Jim Bacher: j.bac
case. Why exclude installation in some of the richest
nations in the world?
Best regards,
Dave Heald
Peter Tarver wrote:
Dave -
Perhaps I was misinformed, but it was my understanding that
70V battery was not panEuropean, but is specific to Germany
and Austria, and then not necessarily
.
Hope this helps and does not confuse the issue too much,
Dave Heald
Bruce Touzel (EUD) wrote:
Does 48Vdc powered telecom equipment need to have a min and max input
rating ?
I have heard of 60Vdc max input, maybe because of charging voltage can
peak to this level, or maybe because some
, (and apologies for no specific answers)
Dave Heald
Peter Tarver wrote:
Someone suggested I go to the ACA web site to look for the
requested information. As a testament to my previous
research on the topic, I present the following.
In my own research, I have found the Telecommunications
Labelling
company need an agent/representative in Australia, or would our
client suffice for these purposes?
Also, do I need to register or otherwise apply with Australia before
applying the C-Tick mark? (I assume yes but have been unable to find
contact information)
Best Regards,
Dave Heald
Forwarded for Glenn Robb. Please include Mr. Robb on any replies.
Dave Heald
Original Message
Subject: Police radar gun
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:20:59 -0400
From: Glenn Robb r...@compliance-engineering.com
Reply-To: r...@compliance-engineering.com
Forwarded for Leslie Wood. Please CC Leslie (lesliew...@aol.com) on
replies.
Dave Heald
Original Message
Subject: JISC to U.S. Code equivalency
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 20:49:00 EDT
From: lesliew...@aol.com
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Forwarded for Marko Radojicic. Please include Marko in any replies.
Dave Heald
Original Message
Subject: System Laser Safety questions
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:50:36 -0700
From: Marko Radojicic marko.radoji...@mapleoptical.com
To: EMC
Forwarded for Guy Barange. Please reply all or include Guy in any
responses (guy.bara...@alcatel.com).
-Dave Heald
Original Message
Subject: Safety Rules regarding Optical interface
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 18:44:12 +0200
From: Guy Barange
, send mail to the list administrators:
Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings
40 matches
Mail list logo
