ipment.
>
> best regards
>
> Tom Cokenias
> T.N. Cokenias Consulting
> P.O. Box 1086
> El Granada CA 94018
>
>
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Scott Xe wrote:
>
>> R&TTE compliance test reports
>>> I notice that some compliance reports of R&TTE
> I notice that some compliance reports of R&TTE are reviewed by a notified body
> while some are issued by an accredited laboratory only. Can someone advise if
> they have different purposes or requirements.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Scott
-
-
In regulation 107/2009, it states the the ecodesign requirements in annex I.
Does "Products placed on the market" mean that only new products placed on
the market are required to implement the requirements? The current products
on the market can continue to be produced and shipped outside EU witho
I will use cookies. Peanut Butter cookies.
>
> CSA Z462
> OHS Guidelines Part 19
>
> -Original Message-
> From: emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]
> <mailto:[mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]> On Behalf Of Scott Xe
> Sent:
Is there any standard for OSH Practice of electrical testing laboratory?
Any example of operating manual for reference?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussi
> In delegated regulation with regard to energy labelling, there are
> verification tolerances for market surveillance. I have learnt that there is
> a new interpretation discussed in EU countries recently that the
> manufacturer/importers cannot use the tolerances in the measurement to support
>
> he will buy it in. The cable tie manufacturer is also subject to REACH. His
> product is cable ties and he can¹t sell cable ties that breach the limit.
>
> John C
>
>
>
> From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 30 January 2012 13:50
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.I
er of
> that component is also bound by REACH, since it¹s a product in its own right.
>
> Not sure if this helps?
>
> John C
>
>
>
> From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 January 2012 09:43
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [PSES
Recently, there is a discussion about the permissible concentration of 0.1%
for SVHCs. If a component is smaller than 0.1% (w/w), the article is
considered acceptable even though the component consists of 100% SVHC. I
believe the REACH regulation is to regulate SVHCs not to be used in the
produc
rosoft Corporation
> ted.eck...@microsoft.com
>
> The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my
> employer.
>
>
> From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 8:09 AM
> To: Ted Eckert; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.OR
confidential and proprietary information. Any
> unauthorized use is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
> message.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gm
In Europe, Euro plug is widely used and accepted although each country may
have their own plug. As in EN standard, the product must be fitted with the
plug in the country where the product is sold. Is Euro plug legally correct
in those countries? I have learnt that it is allowed as the populatio
Michael,
The guidance is compact and very good. Thanks for sharing!
Scott
On 17/01/2012 5:38 PM, "Michael Derby" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I¹m not aware of any requirement for it to be on the DoC. Just the
> equipment, the packaging and the user manual.
>
> I find this labelling guidance doc
66 South Carter Street
> Genoa City WI 53128
> Ph: 262-279-0210
> Email: bstu...@dlsemc.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 10:30 PM
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [P
Dear All,
I have learnt that the latest version requires to test the products upto 6
GHz from 1 GHz. When will it commence on which amendment? Have most of
public labs well equipped to conduct the test to the new requirements?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
-
--
: Scott Xe; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Domestic mains voltage
Scott,
There will be no movement by the UK in the forseeable future.
I append below a definitive response from the UK government's
Department of Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) to a
query I made last June.
at the higher voltages all
the time. It results in shortening its life or causing early failure.
Luckily this will not happen in other European countries.
Scott
From: Bill Lyons [mailto:b...@lyons.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 3:58 PM
To: Scott Xe; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re:
Understand the ultimate goal of nominal mains voltage in EU is 230 Vac +/-10%.
Currently, UK is still 230 Vac +10/-6% according to law and other EU
countries are 230Vac +6/-10%. Is there any update on the progress to the
unified tolerance, +/-10%?
Thanks & regards,
Scott
-
This message
-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
rk...@chrysler.com
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 6:37 AM
To: Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Cigarette socket in vehicles
Hello Scott,
In the case of 12V accessories to plug in normally they
alka
- Original Message -
From: Scott Xe <mailto:scott...@gmail.com>
To: emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 2:38 PM
Subject: Cigarette socket in vehicles
I have learnt that cigarette sockets supply two voltages: 12 or 2
I have learnt that cigarette sockets supply two voltages: 12 or 24 volts.
12-volt sockets are widely used in light duly vehicles while 24-volt sockets
in heavy duty vehicles. The sockets are identical in terms of configuration
and dimensions. Is there any mechanism to prevent a 12-volt equipment
This EuP regulation implementation regarding standby power has legal effect
in their own right and will not therefore be transposed into local law, ie.
UK through UK statutory instruments. Is it a correct understanding?
Scott
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John
.org
Subject: Re: Electrical product recall
In message <496c8c92.09876e0a.1d10.7...@mx.google.com>, dated Tue, 13
Jan 2009, Scott Xe writes:
>My primary concern is for Europe. It seems US has lots of
>information/guidelines.
People have already posted details of the European sys
Ted & Brian,
Thanks for good information.
Scott
From: Ted Eckert [mailto:ted.eck...@microsoft.com]
Sent: 2009年1月13日 01:09 AM
To: Scott Xe; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: Electrical product recall
Hello Scott,
The US Consumer Product Safety Commission has guidanc
Williams; Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Electrical product recall
Nick,
The operational guidelines link for businesses (for dangerous consumer
products) to which you refer is at: htt
://ec.europa.eu/consumers/safety/rapex/guidelines_business_en.htm. It's stated
to be new there, bu
Nick,
Many thanks for your useful information for European markets.
Scott
From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk]
Sent: 2009?~1??13?? 03:06 AM
To: Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Electrical product recall
There is information at the following sites which will
<496b73b1.04686e0a.6145.c...@mx.google.com>, dated Tue,
13 Jan 2009, Scott Xe writes:
>It is a quite common terms in the industry and mostly related to safety
>hazard. We would like to establish a process for the product recall.
>Is there any important rules or guidance to follow for a
It is a quite common terms in the industry and mostly related to safety
hazard. We would like to establish a process for the product recall. Is
there any important rules or guidance to follow for a meaningful and
absolutely necessary recall?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
-
This message is f
Brain,
Dan is right that that is up to your legal department and your management. If
your company is big, your customers are expecting you to do it in greater
depth. In the contrast, the small company is unable to effort doing too much.
How can they survive? This principle is not only appli
John,
Many thanks for your very useful advice.
Regards,
Scott
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 2008?~11??30?? 19:47
To: Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: UK plug & sockets etc. (Safety) regulations
In message <493262ac.08486e0a.6911.6...@mx.goo
erpretation.
Thanks and regards,
Scott
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 2008?~11??24?? 0:54
To: 'John Woodgate'
Cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
Subject: RE: UK plug & sockets etc. (Safety) regulations
Thanks so much for your useful advice!!
Scott
From: John W
Thanks so much for your useful advice!!
Scott
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 12:10 AM
To: Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: UK plug & sockets etc. (Safety) regulations
In message <492971e7.054c6e0a.1c37.f...@mx.goo
Many thanks for your further patience & advice.
>For normal domestic use electrical appliances, they have to be fitted with
a
>standard plug or a conversion plug if it comes with a Euro plug. Did you
>mean it is also acceptable to have a travel adaptor instead of the
>conversion plug if the produ
,
Scott
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:34 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: UK plug & sockets etc. (Safety) regulations
In message <492814c5.05636e0a.3b63.7...@mx.google.com>, dated Sat, 22
Nov 2008
>It appears BS 5733 is for conversion plug, not travel plug adaptor.
>>No, it isn't. The Scope clause is quite general; the standard covers
>>electrical accessories not covered by other standards.
Noted. Thanks!
> In addition, the regulations require the non-UK plug can only be
>removed by
the UK or excluded from SI 1768 in
1944. Is there any new regulation to cover this hole in near future?
Regards,
Scott
From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 3:08 AM
To: Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: UK plug & soc
sage <492442e4.05636e0a.4dd4.0...@mx.google.com>, dated Thu, 20
Nov 2008, Scott Xe writes:
>We have the following universal AC/DC adapters and unsure if they have
>to comply with the captioned regulations that require the fitted non-UK
>plug can only be removed by the use of a tool. Or
We have the following universal AC/DC adapters and unsure if they have to
comply with the captioned regulations that require the fitted non-UK plug can
only be removed by the use of a tool. Or is there any other regulation for
this type of product?
· Universal AC/DC US/EU/UK interchang
There was an consultation to replace SI 1994 1768 in 2006. Is there any
progress in the replacement?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message to the list, sen
It said multiple listing is a terminology used in UL world long time ago. It
does not exist in TUV laboratories and they have other complicated name. That
is just a declaration of identical product with just different name and/or
cosmetics from the client, not from the test laboratory. As the mu
I notice that the LVD test reports almost always have a Constructional Data
Form section. The form containing components is provided from the client.
Some people said those are the critical components and very useful if you need
to verify the correlation between the sample and the test report.
I have read the safety standards for the requirement about earth continuity
test on finished product without mains cord. What about the earth continuity
test for mains cord set? For example, IEC 320 C13 connector to UK main plug
or Schuko plug. Is there any standard for this parameter?
Thank
: Re: Gas type for central Europe
In message <489454f3.18bb720a.7efe.4...@mx.google.com>, dated Sat, 2 Aug
2008, Scott Xe writes:
>Many thanks for your useful advice. Unfortunately EN 437 does not
>contain the information of Poland and Slovakia. Any other more
>resource to g
Nick,
Many thanks for your useful advice. Unfortunately EN 437 does not contain
the information of Poland and Slovakia. Any other more resource to get it?
Best regards,
Scott
From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 10:54 PM
To: Scott Xe
Cc
I am looking for the gas type information for central Europe. Can someone
point me to the right direction to find such information.
Thanks and regards,
Scott
- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
It is a bit encouraging to see the relevant standards that are being revised
in light of the incidents and recalls. It seems the recall does not help
remove the problem completely. The explosion continues after the recall.
For example, LG appointed the Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute
Richard,
If you want to prevent the battery pack from explosion/fire, compliance of
those standards might not accomplish it for the time being. UL 2054, UL
1642 and UL 60950-1 were prepared and published before Sony's battery
recall. All the standards are being revised to address the issue. Aft
John,
Many thanks for your useful history. Do you have any idea where I can
obtain HD 472 S1:1988?
Regards,
Scott
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 10:19 PM
To: Scott Xe
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: EU harmonized mains voltage
In message
—¥ 20:54
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: EU harmonized mains voltage
In message <4857afb4.0c636e0a.77b5.3...@mx.google.com>, dated Tue, 17
Jun 2008, Scott Xe writes:
>According to HD 472 S1:1988 and BS 7697 : 1993, EU harmonized mains
>voltage should be 230 Vac +/-10% over p
According to HD 472 S1:1988 and BS 7697 : 1993, EU harmonized mains voltage
should be 230 Vac +/-10% over past voltages either 230 Vac +6%/-10% for the
countries with original 220 Vac or 230 Vac +10%/-6% for UK with original 240
Vac. 2008 is the last year to implement it. Did EU really implement
501 - 550 of 550 matches
Mail list logo
