Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-30 Thread Cortland Richmond
Ken Javor wrote: My way of thinking about this problem and others like it is to reduce it to the simplest possible problem, and then look at the general case as a linear extrapolation. In this case I look at the interaction of the direct and single bounced ray during a site attenuation

Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-29 Thread Ken Javor
...@emccompliance.com, ieee pstc list emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers Ken Javor wrote: My thinking is just the opposite. The duration of the pulse should be long relative to the time it takes to travel from transmit to receive antennas. Then there is no smearing

Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-29 Thread Cortland Richmond
Ken Javor wrote: My thinking is just the opposite. The duration of the pulse should be long relative to the time it takes to travel from transmit to receive antennas. Then there is no smearing It seems to me that you may be overlooking the effect of the reflected wave on a received pulse's

Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-29 Thread Ken Javor
to the field. Do you? From: drcuthb...@micron.com Reply-To: drcuthb...@micron.com Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:49:12 -0600 To: j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk, emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: pulse modulation in reverb chambers Ken, do you mean you pulse an antenna with a square wave

RE: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-29 Thread drcuthb...@micron.com
modulation in reverb chambers I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in bb49768d.3717%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com) about 'pulse modulation in reverb chambers' on Sun, 27 Jul 2003: So if I am worried whether the 1 us pulse width can be sustained, and I don't know how

RE: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-28 Thread Grasso, Charles
list Subject: Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers That mostly makes sense, except I'm not sure about this part: I'd expect a pulse to excite many modes within a chamber as long as either its length or its transition times are shorter than the time it takes a wave to travel across the chamber

Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-28 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in bb49ae98.374a%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com) about 'pulse modulation in reverb chambers' on Sun, 27 Jul 2003: Sorry, but I don't understand the physics here. Could you please explain how a 10 us delay could add 0.01 us to a

Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-27 Thread Ken Javor
...@jmwa.demon.co.uk Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 07:36:15 +0100 To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in bb48596e.36a1%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com) about 'pulse modulation in reverb chambers

Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-27 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in bb48596e.36a1%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com) about 'pulse modulation in reverb chambers' on Sat, 26 Jul 2003: What is the limitation on minimum pulse width in reverberation chambers? I expect it relates to room size, but

Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-27 Thread Ken Javor
...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in bb4987fa.372a%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com) about 'pulse modulation in reverb chambers' on Sun, 27 Jul 2003: As long as those delays are much shorter than 1 us

Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-27 Thread Ken Javor
. From: Cortland Richmond 72146@compuserve.com Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:44:20 -0400 To: Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com, ieee pstc list emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers Ken, A recent article on reverberant chambers mentions a Q of 83,000 or so

Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-27 Thread Cortland Richmond
Ken, A recent article on reverberant chambers mentions a Q of 83,000 or so. I'd expect a pulse to excite many modes within a chamber as long as either its length or its transition times are shorter than the time it takes a wave to travel across the chamber and back. That'll smear the pulse. On

Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-27 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in bb4987fa.372a%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com) about 'pulse modulation in reverb chambers' on Sun, 27 Jul 2003: As long as those delays are much shorter than 1 us (path difference much less than 300 meters), the original

Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-27 Thread Ken Javor
Reply-To: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 18:52:33 +0100 To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in bb49768d.3717%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com) about 'pulse

Re: pulse modulation in reverb chambers

2003-07-27 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in bb49768d.3717%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com) about 'pulse modulation in reverb chambers' on Sun, 27 Jul 2003: So if I am worried whether the 1 us pulse width can be sustained, and I don't know how to determine it