EMC Forum,
I apologize for the Shameless Advertisement on the Technocal Forum. It was
not my intention to break any rules of the IEEE society. I have been a
member for quite some time and thought that I have seen similar FREE OPEN
HOUSE events in the past. I have learned much from this
Could be viewed as free advert for Agilent.
That's okay, John. I replied privately to Gunter, and I called
the E7401A an absolute piece of trash. So it evens out
in the end.
Cheers!
Mike Mertinooke
Peter,
Thanks for the response. Our original design called for separate circuits,
but for a variety of reasons, we decided to go with the single 100 A input.
Since I had never seen it before, I thought I'd ask if anyone in this forum
ever had.
Susanne Delisle
Product Safety Engineer
Where are you located?
//Jack
-Original Message-
From: Bill Ronzio [mailto:bill.ron...@flextronics.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:30 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: OPEN HOUSE (Flextronics Compliance Labs)
**THIS IS A
I just realized I shouldn't have gotten into so much detail on about my
experiences about the analyzer on the general board. I should've responded
in person.
Could be viewed as free advert for Agilent.
My apologies . . . John A. Juhasz
Product Qualification
Compliance Engineer
Fiber Options,
I have one, I LOVE it! For the price (I paid around $16k), you can't go
wrong!
Color Display
3-Traces
Built-in Pre-Amp
AM/FM Demodulation
Hard Disc
3.5 Floppy Disk
Limit set-up (packaged floppy has
limits for all popular int'l emissions standards)
Correction factors for popular antennas (also
Gunter,
We have an Agilent E7404A from the same family of Spectrum Analyzers. We
have used it as a general EMI and signal integrity diagnostic tool. We have
not run the built-in EMI pre-compliance reports. We like the fact that it
is a digital instrument which is an improvement over the
Hi All,
I am hoping that someone has had some experience the interface definitions
covered in the ITU K series recommendations. My question is regarding the
interface references given as Tsub1 and Tsub2 in Table 1 of K.41. This
is referring to the telecommunications interface, but it is not
We have several analyzers in this series and have nothing but good things to
say about them. We even drag them out to our OATS and they survive the
trips. Agilent is phasing out some of the EMC equipment, so make sure that
you are not going to buy an orphan. At least make sure that they will
Fellows
I am looking for a spectrum analyzer for EMC pre-compliance.
The Agilent E7401A is an option we are studying.
Does someone have any comments about this equipment ?
Did someone have experiences with this analyser, and want to share some
good or bad aspects ?
Thank you all
Günter J.
Dave Heald wrote:
Article 2, Definitions
(c) `radio equipment means a product, or relevantcomponent thereof,
capable of communication bymeans of the emission and/or reception of
radiowaves utilising the spectrum allocated to terrestrial/space
radiocommunication;
Hi Dave,
The police
Hello All !
I would appreciate comments on the UL CTDP - Client Test Data Program,
how beneficial it is? what are the expenses involved ?
Best Regards,
Israel Yeshurun, Product Compliance team leader, CreoScitex
corporation, Israel.
P.O.Box 330 Herzliya B,
Suzanne,
After discussing your problem with our telecoms expert, this is what he has
to say:
The best solution for such a high power consumption unit is to split the
power into 2 or 3 terminal blocks. This means you protect each terminal
block with a separate breaker that complies with currents
Suzanne,
Your best bet is to use components that have been previously evaluated for
field wiring, such as a UL Recognized terminal block for the + and - and a
UL Listed pressure terminal connector for the protective earthing terminal;
of course both have to be suitable for the 100 A and the
**THIS IS A FREE EVENT**
FLEXTRONICS COMPLIANCE LABS IS HOSTING AN OPEN HOUSE (June 21st 11:00am -
4:00pm)
Pig Pickin 11:30am - 1:30pm
We are Introducing our upgraded NEBS GR-1089-CORE Testing and Engineering
Lab
MEET THE EXPERTS, Have your
I would be grateful if any private replies to this e-mail would be copied
to me as well.
Sounds a lot like a DC to DC converter I will be looking at in a couple
of months.
Best regards
Chris Chileshe
Ultronics ltd.
mailto:chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk
-Original Message-
From:
Dave, I disagree on your conclusion that a police radar gun is not a
communication device. The device has a transmitter and a receiver and an
automobile acts as a transponder. The device communicates with itself.
However, even if the automobile is not present, the transmitter can be
active and
Hi there,
Has anybody got any circuits for input and output filtering of dc to dc
switch mode supplies, looking to filter a supply with a clock rate of
300kHz, that is a switching a 28Vdc square wave into a transformer. Ouput
supplies and 0V taken from transformer tapings.
Note: at present 0V
Doug,
You may find the following usefull
ftp://ftp.t11.org/t11/pub/fc/10gfc/01-276v0.pdf
Although titled 'Laser Safety for Parallel Optic Products' the fist few
pages deal with changes in eyesafety generally
Dave
Massey, Doug C. wrote:
Hello Group -
Can anyone direct me to an
--
From: John Woodgate[SMTP:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Reply To: John Woodgate
Sent: 11 June 2001 21:05
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: FW: Product Safety: A Matter of Law or Litigation?
Hi all,
Any out there who knows if an updated Annex A1 in the 96/98/EC Marine
Equipment Directive is coming up soon ?
Best regards
Amund Westin, Oslo/Norway
--
Get your firstname@lastname email for FREE at http://Nameplanet.com/?su
---
This message
Hi Folks
WRT the IEC standard(s), as I understand it, IEC documents are - and always
have been - advisory documents which only have legal force when they
have been officially adopted in a particular country or region (e.g. the EU)
by the relevant regulatory or standards body(ies) [ or adopted in
FD27170820E5DD42B1D5B13DE96A775404BF9F@mrl01, Massey, Doug C.
masse...@ems-t.com inimitably wrote:
Of greater concern is the lack of a specified transition period and
mandatory compliance dates in either standard (at least I can't find them).
Will existing laser classifications be grandfathered?
Kyle:
Take a look at www.Intellon.com . They detail a link to some of the
problems associated with proximity of Bluetooth devices to 802.11 LAN
specs. These are claimed to be potential interference problems related to
hop frequency differences in the two spread spectrum systems.
There is also
Forwarded for Glenn Robb. Please include Mr. Robb on any replies.
Dave Heald
Original Message
Subject: Police radar gun
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:20:59 -0400
From: Glenn Robb r...@compliance-engineering.com
Reply-To: r...@compliance-engineering.com
I think they have done a pretty good job describing this in the 3rd edition
of 60950, see 3.1.9. The 2nd edition seems only to regard this as
applicable to primary power terminals (3.3.4). This is probably why the
agencies had to apply their own interpretations (i.e. UL PAGs) over the
years.
You might try PTB in Braunschweig Germany. I have witnesses them testing
radar guns on the road in front of their laboratory.
Tony
Anton (Tony) Nikolassy
Project Engineer
Factory Mutual Research
Ph: 781-255-4819
Fx: 781-762-9375
Email: anton.nikola...@fmglobal.com
Hello all,
Doug has brought up some interesting questions. I too would like to follow
this thread.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Massey, Doug C. [mailto:masse...@ems-t.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 1:55 PM
To: 'IEEE Forum'
Subject: New laser standards
Hello Group -
Can anyone
28 matches
Mail list logo
