Late reply:
I have not looked at DO-199, but I noticed that RTCA also has the following
document:
DO-233 Issued: 08/20/1996
Description: This document addresses the potential interference to installed
aircraft electrical and electronic systems from Portable Electronic Devices
(PEDs) carried
I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8
4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A046758DF@flbocexu05) about 'Layered Reinforced
Insulation' on Mon, 28 Oct 2002:
Someone mentioned that the
two insulations must be the same material in order for the system to be
classified as reinforced.
I read in !emc-pstc that Scott Douglas dougl...@naradnetworks.com
wrote (in 5.0.2.1.2.20021022080058.00a69...@pop.business.earthlink.net
) about 'Do I need to Test for Harmonics?' on Tue, 22 Oct 2002:
One argument says that we are not connected to the public
low-voltage distribution
I would agree with your argument that you need not comply because you are not
connected to the public low voltage supply. Furthermore, the standards you
cite are written for 230V, 50Hz distribution, so your voltage is not even
within the scope of the standard.
John P. Wagner
Regulatory
Scott, you do not have to test for power line harmonics or flicker if 1)
your product is not mains powered, and 2) you have no intention of selling
it along with a particular power source, and 3) you do not specify that it
be used with a particular power source. If the choice of power source is
Rich,
This is correct. As I understand the standard is identical to EN 61000-3-2.
Regards,
Josh
Josh Wiseman
EMC/Product Safety
-Original Message-
From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:59 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
You are going to have to forgive Bruce. He is originally from South Africa,
transplanted first to western Canada, and now to Eastern Canada.
John
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Jason Greenwood
Sent:
OK, I'll get more specific. I have an external interconnecting cable that
contains hazardous voltages. Because of the application, in the USA I must
use UL Listed CL3P cable which is rated for use in risers and air handling
spaces (smoke requirements of the National Electrical Code). The
I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8
4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A046758D9@flbocexu05) about 'China CCC Certification'
on Mon, 28 Oct 2002:
Harmonics testing has been added as part of the conversion from CCIB and
CCEE to the new CCC mark. IEC 61000-3-2 (Limits for Harmonic
I read in !emc-pstc that Richard Hughes rehug...@nortelnetworks.com
wrote (in 6b78f2524cd7d5118a0402204840075b02795...@zhard0jc.europe.nort
el.com) about 'LED's and laser safety?' on Mon, 28 Oct 2002:
If I said that the LVD was 'new approach' then you or someone else would
feel the
Ted,
I have just been to the site and agree it is excellent. I cannot believe
the
many differences! It is almost a wonder we communicate at all!! Once or
twice I went That's why he didn't understand or So that's what she
meant.
Of course a lot of it can be deduced from context, but there are
I certainly agree that reinforced can be a solid insulation - hence the 0.4.
mm thickness requirement. Sorry if my memo gave you a different impression.
Bill Bisenius
bi...@productsafet.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
unsubscribe emc-pstc raymond.gar...@casa.eads.net
end
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To
Chris -
On the basis of workplace safety, listing by a nonNRTL is
largely useless. On the other hand, if the persons
providing the listing are a competent engineering firm,
using licensed engineers, there may be some credibility to
the listing (for instance, the NEC allows waivers of certain
John,
If I said that the LVD was 'new approach' then you or someone else would
feel the necessity to correct me. Instead I am being castigated for being
accurate but hair-splitting.
So be it.
Richard Hughes
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Hello Bob,
The document has not been published in the OJ yet but it has been recognized by
the FDA for use where the 1983 version was not recognized for use in the US.
Brodie Pedersen
Nonin Medical Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Véronique Beauvois [mailto:v.beauv...@ulg.ac.be]
Sent:
Oops! I need more coffee. Please disregard and delete.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International
-Original Message-
From: WOODS, RICHARD
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:16 AM
To: 'emc-pstc'
Subject: Compliance Engineering Status Report
Test sched master.xls deliverables.doc
Test sched master.xls
Description: application/excel
deliverables.doc
Description: MS-Word document
I received the following information from a US organization.
Harmonics testing has been added as part of the conversion from CCIB and
CCEE to the new CCC mark. IEC 61000-3-2 (Limits for Harmonic Current
Emissions) is similar in content to GB 17625.1.
Is this true?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic
I read in !emc-pstc that Richard Hughes rehug...@nortelnetworks.com
wrote (in 6b78f2524cd7d5118a0402204840075b02795...@zhard0jc.europe.nort
el.com) about 'LED's and laser safety?' on Mon, 28 Oct 2002:
A product carries a CE marking to show that it complies with the national
Warren,
A product carries a CE marking to show that it complies with the national
implementations of all applicable 'new approach' EU Directives (and the LVD,
which isn't 'new approach').
Exactly which EU Directive(s) do you think apply to LEDs as components? The
LVD certainly does not apply
Fellow Listees:
There were some recent threads regarding what testing is required for a
product that obtains power from a supply external to the product and
maybe not supplied by the manufacturer. I think the questions were
related to EFT or surge.
I have a similar situation. Our products are
22 matches
Mail list logo
