[PSES] ESD Table Top Testing Bench with IEC 61000-4-2

Dear Colleagues, We made a decision to renovate our laboratory with new lab benches. This has led to a bit of a conundrum with our ESD benches. Our local Feng Shui expert has proclaimed that it would not do to have all new lab benches except for our old ESD wooden benches. The issue we keep

Re: [PSES] Active Implantable Medical Devices

Hi Grace For your point 2 Under the RE-D for EMC compliance, you are not required to use a notified body if a particular standard is not listed in the OJEU. See Articles 3(1)(b) and 17(2) of the RE-D http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014L0053=EN Kind regards

Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.

Perhaps trust may be an issue, but given that the current system of humans making the decisions kills more than 3,000 people a day according to https://asirt.org/initiatives/informing-road-users/road-safety-facts/road-crash-statistics surely we could get over it Kevin From: Ken Javor

Re: [PSES] Measurement Accuracy

Hello All Have I misunderstood the words in IEC62052-31? In a hypothetical measurement of an applied voltage where the uncertainty of the exact value is 1% and a test voltage of 100 is required, the manufacturer would need to insist on a 101V test voltage and the test facility would have to

[PSES] Presumption of conformity Question

Dear Colleagues In 2014 CENELEC published an amendment to the EMC standard for alarm systems EN 50130-4:2011/A1:2014. In all the time since the commission failed to post it in the OJ for the old EMC directive to the considerable detriment of manufactures of alarm equipment. In May of this

[PSES] Information for Mr. Woodgate

Hello In response to the question posed under Mr. Woodgate's signature "Is there a homeopathic remedy for excessive gullibility?" and as it is a Friday, the answer is yes. See http://gulligo.com/ Kind Regards Kevin This e-mail contains privileged and

Re: [PSES] EN 50130-4: 2013

Hi David There is no 2013 version of EN50130-4. The last full version was in 2011, followed by a 2014 amendment (A1) Although A1 was voted positively over a year ago, the European commission has still not yet managed to actually post the document in the OJEU! Technically speaking for the

[PSES] Conducted Immunity Software

Hello The software running our conducted immunity setup is of a certain age and has never been particularly user friendly so we are considering updating it. The test platform needs to support both residential and commercial level set-up and testing but not any MIL standards. In terms of

Re: [PSES] SV: [PSES] Conflict - cited standard vs. OJ standard

regards Amund Fra: Harris, Kevin J (DSC) [mailto:kevinharr...@tycoint.com] Sendt: 5. februar 2014 19:01 Til: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGmailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Emne: Re: [PSES] Conflict - cited standard vs. OJ standard All, I have consulted with TC 72 (the authors of the EN 54 series

Re: [PSES] Conflict - cited standard vs. OJ standard

All, I have consulted with TC 72 (the authors of the EN 54 series) and they are well aware of the problem. The long term goal is to update those parts with the dated references but in the meantime I have the following quote from the committee TC 72 works closely with the group of notified

Re: [PSES] Conflict - cited standard vs. OJ standard

Brian, That guidance is not quite applicable here. Only EN 50130-4 is listed in the OJ as an EMC standard and so can be the only standard used for presumption of conformity. The EN 54 series is a product performance set of standards and the requirements contained therein technically have no

[PSES] Portable IR spectrometer

Dear Colleagues, I am looking for a portable instrument to measure emissions from a light source into the mid IR range. It is fairly easy to find equipment to cover the visible light portion of the spectrum but I'm having difficulty identifying equipment for the IR range especially for the 3

Re: [PSES] safety 60950 and surge suppression circuits

LiokKKlklKMmmKrm$KmkJmM Sent from my BlackBerry From: Bill Owsley [mailto:wdows...@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 02:21 PM To: Boštjan Glavič bostjan.gla...@siq.si Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] safety 60950 and surge

Re: [PSES] Amendment A1: 2008 to EN 50131-5-3: 2005

Hi David, The changes in 2008 were to Annex E and F Annex E had a correction to the calculation for the Immunity to message substitution formula Annex F had a correction to the 1st diagram replacing the value in abscissa 10 s with 5 s. The interpretation sheet IS1 was issued separately

IEC TC77 Convenor

Dear Colleagues, I am trying to contact the convenor or a member the of IEC TC77 working group that produced IEC 61000-6-2. My working group for EMC requirements in alarm systems would like to consult with them. If anybody has some contact details could you please forward them to me offline

RE: Teleproducts

Hi Daniel, We have a PSTN 21 system also and when Genesys went belly up a new company with limited resources to look after Genesys products was formed by the former principal of Genesys. You can contact him at Evans Test Engineering Turnkey Test Measurement Solutions Unit 15 Victoria House

GSM Base Station Power Levels

Dear Colleagues, In my standards working group we are reviewing the test level for radiated immunity. Some members of the group have proposed that in GSM bands we raise the test level to 30 V/m. The proposal is based on a GSM base station located on the roof of the building housing the