Hi,
here are the important differences:
EN 61326 is a product family standard.
EN 61131-2 is a product standard: IEC 61000-4-3 1,4 - 2,0 GHz / 800 / 960 MHz
with 10 V/m, more detailed requirements and test setups for conducted
disturbances in specific EMC zones.
The product standard has
In message 4490f830.5060...@aol.com, dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Derek
Walton lfresea...@aol.com writes
can anyone give me a quick overview of how these stds differ please?
I'm familier with EN 61326, but not EN 61131-2
EN 61326:1998, IEC 61326-1:1997 Electrical equipment for measurement,
control
John et al
I obtained a copy of the complete standard i.e. EN61326 + A1+A2+A3 from them
in July 2005 at a very favourable cost.
Ian Gordon
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more
In message
e1ba0362b28ed211a1e80008c71ea30603387...@z-160-100-30-252.est.ibm.com,
dated Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Gordon,Ian ian.gor...@bocedwards.com writes
We subscribe to BSI online but I got my paper copy from BSI by phoning
up BSI publications and asking for it in July 2005. This was not an
John et al
Without going into any detail at all Amendment 3 (actually dated 2004 in the
standard with a DOPOCOCOSS of 2006-10-01) incorporates Annex E and Annex F.
These are concerned with the following:
ANNEX E: Test configurations, operational conditions and performance
criteria for portable
Hi all,
The EN 61326 A3 can be purchased separately from the Danish Standards
http://www.en.ds.dk/
eventhoug it´s in Denmark tehy offer online trade and the link uses the
English text version.
Search for: EN 61326 to get a full list of offerings for the mentioned
standard.
B.Rrgds.
Peter
John,
We have IEC 61326:2002. My concern is that the C77 (March 31, 2005) and
C246 (October 5, 2005) Official Journal of the European Union (OJ)
published new Harmonized Standards for the EMC Directive 89/336/EEC,
showing as the last item for EN 61326:1997:
Amendment A3:2003 to EN 61326:1997
In message $wl6j4aokvaef...@jmwa.demon.co.uk, dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006,
John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk writes
There is an IEC 61327:2002, which may be adopted by CENELEC to replace
the 1997 edition of the EN.
Oops! I meant IEC 61326:2002 of course.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try
Piotr Galka piotr.ga...@micromade.pl wrote (in
020c01c56c3f$4ae83ac0$154d4d0a@MmRouter) about 'EN 61326 Deviation',
on Wed, 8 Jun 2005:
It is the whole standard (52 pages of text) but they forgot to add
annexes A,B,C (I'm sure).
Yes, if the standard has 52 pages but no Annexes, it is
.
And no world that 1. has no A,B,C and 2. has all.
What would you buy if you need the whole standard ?
Regards
Piotr
From: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: EN 61326 Deviation
Piotr Galka piotr.ga...@micromade.pl wrote
Piotr Galka piotr.ga...@micromade.pl wrote (in
000d01c56c02$95ae7520$154d4d0a@MmRouter) about 'EN 61326 Deviation',
on Wed, 8 Jun 2005:
Now I see that PN-EN 61326 is incomplete.
What you have is just an Amendment, not the whole standard.
So, you can't believe in any standard you have.
How
I have PN-EN 61326:2003.
Mistake:
It is PN-EN 61326 February 2003, but the right symbol is PN-EN 61326:2002(U)
Piotr Galka
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message to the list, send
Stefanski kstef...@poczta.onet.pl
To: Piotr Galka piotr.ga...@micromade.pl; EMC-PSTC emc-p...@ieee.org;
Kozinski, Gary (GE - Infrastructure) gary.kozin...@ge.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: EN 61326 Deviation
Hello
For devices intended to use in industrial envvronment
- Infrastructure)
gary.kozin...@ge.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: EN 61326 Deviation
Hi Gary,
I have no big experience in EMC but in my opinion:
If you selected 61326 for your device then you can test 61000-4-3 to 3V/m
(Table
1).
Regards
Piotr Galka
- Original
Hi Gary,
I have no big experience in EMC but in my opinion:
If you selected 61326 for your device then you can test 61000-4-3 to 3V/m
(Table
1).
Regards
Piotr Galka
From: Kozinski, Gary (GE - Infrastructure) gary.kozin...@ge.com
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:34 PM
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:42 AM
To: 'wisemanps...@mchsi.com'; EMC-PSTC
Subject: RE: EN 61326-1 question
Josh
Although not referred to in EN61326 can you apply EN55014-1 to your product?
This provides for assessment of discontinuous interference.
Scope of EN 55014-1:
ELECTROMAGNETIC
Josh
Although not referred to in EN61326 can you apply EN55014-1 to your product?
This provides for assessment of discontinuous interference.
Scope of EN 55014-1:
ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY -
REQUIREMENTS FOR HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES,
ELECTRIC TOOLS AND SIMILAR APPARATUS -
Part 1: Emission
1 Scope
In article 011501c52891$fbe3b3a0$154d4d0a@MmRouter, Piotr Galka
piotr.ga...@micromade.pl writes
It is for: electrical equipment.intended for. educational
use,
That's sufficient for you.
including . - laboratory use. I am trying to interpret the
,including, because I can't find
Hi Gordon,
I've sent him an e-mail asking... I'll post his reply. Not sure if he
has taken a long weekend...
Cheers,
Derek.
Gordon,Ian wrote on 9/3/2004, 3:12 AM:
Derek
Did the committee member also say whether the immunity tests were to be
performed continuously or at specific spot
In article E1BA0362B28ED211A1E80008C71EA30602070166@z-
160-100-30-252.est.ibm.com, Gordon,Ian ian.gor...@bocedwards.com
writes
I
realise the best solution is to buy the document, but I cant see it on
the
IEC website - and BSI cant help either!
Being a still CDV, it's not publicly available. But
Derek
Did the committee member also say whether the immunity tests were to be
performed continuously or at specific spot frequencies? Furthermore, are
there any proposed exclusions from this requirement? e.g. if the product
does not contain clocks above, say, 1GHz this testing is not required.
I
The date format published in BS EN61326:1997 is
2001-07-01
That should resolve the 'U.S.' versus 'European' date format question.
On Tue, 04 January 2000, lisa_cef...@mksinst.com wrote:
Could someone please clarify the dow for EN 61326? I've heard 1/7/2001 and
7/1/2001. Thank you.
Happy
Lisa,
It is July first of 2001. 1/7/2001 is the UK way whereas 7/1/2001 the US way.
Barry
Happy New Millennium for everybody!
On Tue, 04 January 2000, lisa_cef...@mksinst.com wrote:
Could someone please clarify the dow for EN 61326? I've heard 1/7/2001 and
7/1/2001. Thank you.
Lisa
The DOW for EN 61326 is July 1, 2001.
Regards
Joe Martin
P.E. Biosystems
lisa_cef...@mksinst.com on 01/04/2000 08:59:42 AM
Please respond to lisa_cef...@mksinst.com
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
cc:(bcc: Joe P Martin/FOS/PEC)
Subject: EN 61326
Could someone
I don't know for sure . . . but one thing to take into consideration is your
source
of info. If the 7/1/2001 date was from Europe, be aware that in Europe that
means
January 7, 2001. In Europe they note the day THEN the month.
-John Juhasz-
Fiber Options, Inc.
Bohemia, NY
-Original
Dear Laura,
Yes, you are correct.
You must start the test at the zero cross points (0 and 180).
Best regards,
Tetsuya Hashimoto
A-pex International Co.,Ltd.
2nd EMC Division Yokowa Lab
E-mail: has...@a-pex.co.jp
Hello Everyone,
While reviewing the new EN 61326 standard I noticed that the
Jason,
I too am interested in using the EN 1326-1 standard for testing my
companies products, but I don't believe it has been published in the OJ yet
(at least I have not found it, if it is). As such I don't believe it can be
used by a manufacturer, particularly if you are self declaring. Did
If applicable (has a power cord), then 61000-4-2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11are all
required for 61326-1. I'm not sure what you're asking when you ask for
input. The levels in the standard are the levels required.
61000-4-8 is not required.EN 50082-1 is a generic standard and
is superceded
This may provide some of the answers to Jason Chesley's questions on EN
61326-1.
The DOW as stated in EN 61326-1 (1997) has no relevance with regard to
CE-Marking since I don't believe this standard is yet listed in the OJ. In
my view, the delay in seeing the standard listed is linked to the
...@ieee.org, Jason Chesley
103401.1...@compuserve.com
cc:(bcc: Eric Lifsey/AUS/NIC)
Subject: RE: EN 61326-1 April 1997
This may provide some of the answers to Jason Chesley's questions on EN
61326-1.
The DOW as stated in EN 61326-1 (1997) has no relevance with regard to
CE-Marking since I
30 matches
Mail list logo
