Re: [PSES] Machinery Directive DOC Questions

2012-01-04 Thread Piotr Galka
and measure its growth each day. Piotr Galka MicroMade Poland - Original Message - From: Kunde, Brian To: 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG' Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:38 PM Subject: Machinery Directive DOC Questions Our company makes laboratory equipment (the red-headed

Re: [PSES] Machinery Directive silly question?

2012-05-02 Thread Piotr Galka
by Machinery Directive? Do the device using MEMS technology (contains micro moving parts) has moving parts and is covered by Machinery Directive? Best Regards Piotr Galka MicroMade Poland - Original Message - From: Nick Williams nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk To: Peter Merguerian

Re: [PSES] safety 60950 and surge suppression circuits

2013-06-12 Thread Piotr Galka
understand it. Piotr Galka - Original Message - From: Joe Randolph To: ri...@ieee.org Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:08 AM Subject: Re: safety 60950 and surge suppression circuits Hi Rich: Thanks for insight on this. I think your

Re: CE marking in-house equipment.

2008-09-15 Thread Piotr Galka
wrong ? Piotr Galka MicroMade Poland - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user

Deviation of Performance Criteria - other question.

2008-11-06 Thread Piotr Galka
you can help me. Best Regards Piotr Galka piotr.ga...@micromade.pl - Original Message - From: Kunde, Brian mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com To: Ted Eckert mailto:ted.eck...@microsoft.com ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Sent: Wednesday, November 05

Re: Deviation of Performance Criteria - other question.

2008-11-07 Thread Piotr Galka
to have the problem solved once for always? Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org

Re: Deviation of Performance Criteria - other question.

2008-11-07 Thread Piotr Galka
'EMC Working Party'. Do you know that way takes few weeks/months/years ? Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

Re: Deviation of Performance Criteria - other question.

2008-11-07 Thread Piotr Galka
damaged because I don't see any solution to that. I should be able to limit the emission just making square being not square and persuade the pupil that it is really square what they see ;-) Regards Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc

Re: Deviation of Performance Criteria - other question.

2008-11-07 Thread Piotr Galka
problem. Regards Piotr Galka P.S. Live was easy and pleasant before 2004 ;-) - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http

Re: Deviation of Performance Criteria - other question.

2008-11-07 Thread Piotr Galka
breadboard isn't complete as it is destined to be installed in some case. 3) Use a SELV power limited supply. Right. Regards Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message

Re: Deviation of Performance Criteria - other question.

2008-11-12 Thread Piotr Galka
disturbance and can't be affected by such disturbance ? and why do you think so ? I'd be very happy if I can be sure my equipment does not fit this definition but it looks I miss some point you see it. Best Regards Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc

Re: Deviation of Performance Criteria - other question.

2008-11-13 Thread Piotr Galka
Directive and its guide I am still not sure if after 2004 we sell it legally or not and designing new (this time analogue) education system I'd like to be sure. Best regards Piotr Galka - Original Message - From: Pickard, Ron ron.pick...@intermec.com To: EMC-PSTC emc-p...@ieee.org Cc

Re: Deviation of Performance Criteria - other question.

2008-11-13 Thread Piotr Galka
I described earlier even they are not the best from education point of view. I hope I would not need to follow the procedure for each board which I suppose to be ready in few months delays between each other. Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc

Re: 375MHz from 10/100Base-T

2008-11-25 Thread Piotr Galka
. I don't understand why to avoid capacitance between signal gnd and chassis gnd planes and at the same time use the capacitor between them ? Regards Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your

Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power

2009-01-15 Thread Piotr Galka
to the energy wealth of future generations Considering the fact that if device is used in heated location than reducing its power (active and stand-by) saves no energy I came to: Let's start from reducing outdoor devices stand-by mode ? ;-) Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety

Re: Cigarette socket in vehicles

2009-01-19 Thread Piotr Galka
By the way. I don't understand why cars still don't have specialised sockets for electronic equipment. The cigarette sockets likes to lose contact (it is my experience). Piotr Galka - Original Message - From: Scott Xe mailto:scott...@gmail.com To: emc-p

Re: CE logo dimension in small products

2009-01-23 Thread Piotr Galka
is equivalent to XOR gate logic. Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for developer/evaluation boards

2013-10-26 Thread Piotr Galka
and put CE on it. Best Regards Piotr Galka - Original Message - From: EMC Guy To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 5:47 PM Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for developer/evaluation boards Hi Brian, Your summary is exemplary. It points out

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for developer/evaluation boards

2013-10-26 Thread Piotr Galka
Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for developer/evaluation boards

2013-11-04 Thread Piotr Galka
we (Poland) joined EU) the question about prototype board was my first thought. Being not clear solved in directive that subject makes me to have clear opinion about its authors. Best Regards Piotr Galka - This message is from

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for developer/evaluation boards

2013-11-05 Thread Piotr Galka
Some 'experts' were recruited at some stage as 'advisers', but the selection seems to have been based on criteria other than technical expertise. As always :) or rather As always :( Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE

Re: [PSES] EMC requirements for developer/evaluation boards

2013-11-05 Thread Piotr Galka
in member laws (and long discussions here :) ). If I during first reading of directive (not reading any other directives before) see some problems in it I don't believe no one noticed it. I think they noticed, and I don't understand why they didn't do anything with it. Regards Piotr Galka

[PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts

2013-11-13 Thread Piotr Galka
more logical for someone trying to make ROHS DoC but: If they wonted to say part type or range of part types they would certainly said that. As they didn't said that I think they had the previous understanding in mind. What is the solution I don't see ? Best Regards Piotr Galka

Re: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts

2013-11-19 Thread Piotr Galka
surprising for me is the Q7.2. I knew that: - carrot is the fruit, - snail is the fish, - Poland, Germany and some other countries have no access to the sea, and it looks that I should add to that list that: - light is not electromagnetic field. Best Regards Piotr Galka - Original Message

Re: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts

2013-11-22 Thread Piotr Galka
in their plastic it is much less care than in electronic devices? May be the direct RoHS scope interpretation saying manuals and CDs need also be RoHS is reasonable ;) Best Regards Piotr Galka - Original Message - From: Crane, Lauren To: Piotr Galka ; EMC-PSTC Sent: Thursday

Re: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts

2013-11-22 Thread Piotr Galka
. Regards Piotr Galka - Original Message - From: Peter Tarver ptar...@enphaseenergy.com To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 6:44 PM Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts From: Piotr Galka Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 05:15 The fourth side: We (I

[PSES] EN 300 330-1 H-field limit for 13.56MHz RFID

2013-12-28 Thread Piotr Galka
- 30MHz : -16dBuA/m or -3.5dBuA/m Best Regards Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org All emc-pstc

Re: [PSES] EN 300 330-1 H-field limit for 13.56MHz RFID

2013-12-30 Thread Piotr Galka
have selected EN 300 330-1/-2. Piotr - Original Message - From: Larry Stillings To: 'Piotr Galka' ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2013 4:36 PM Subject: RE: [PSES] EN 300 330-1 H-field limit for 13.56MHz RFID Piotr, Have you also looked at EN

Re: [PSES] EN 300 330-1 H-field limit for 13.56MHz RFID

2013-12-31 Thread Piotr Galka
the carrier and asks if any transponder is in field so it modulates the carrier. If not it switches the carrier off, if yes the carrier exists a little longer to read the whole transponder answer. The tests in my opinion should be possible with device working as it is intended to do. Piotr Galka

Re: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD

2017-08-02 Thread Piotr Galka
at sections 9.5 and 11 of the "RED Guide," the Guide to the Radio Equipment Directive 2014/53/EU dated 19 May 2017. Mike Sherman Graco Inc. *From: *"Piotr Galka" <piotr.ga...@micromade.pl>

Re: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD

2017-08-03 Thread Piotr Galka
ż sp.j Gdańsk Polska W dniu 2017-08-03 o 15:35, John Woodgate pisze: With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk <http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk/> J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England Sylvae in aeternum manent. *From:*Piotr Galka [mailto:piotr.ga..

Re: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD

2017-08-04 Thread Piotr Galka
odgate and Associates Rayleigh England Sylvae in aeternum manent. *From:*Piotr Galka [mailto:piotr.ga...@micromade.pl] *Sent:* 03 August 2017 16:28 *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* Re: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD I think I don't feel 'Whereas' precisely. In Polish directives it was re

Re: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD

2017-08-04 Thread Piotr Galka
lish). :>) br, Pete Peter E Perkins, PE Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant PO Box 23427 Tigard, ORe 97281-3427 503/452-1201 p.perk...@ieee.org <mailto:p.perk...@ieee.org> *From:*Piotr Galka [mailto:piotr.ga...@micromade.pl] *Sent:* Thursday, Augus

Re: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD

2017-08-04 Thread Piotr Galka
Pete, If I were lawyer I would call it wonderful, but I am on opposite side :) Piotr W dniu 2017-08-03 o 20:26, Pete Perkins pisze: Piotr, Isn’t it wonderful when lawyers write documents which technical engineers are supposed to use to meet the legal requirements. Synonyms from my

Re: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD

2017-08-03 Thread Piotr Galka
14/35/EU should not apply to radio equipment. This means that the RED applies the safety provisions of the LVD, without the administrative texts that are not about safety, since if they were included they would partly duplicate (even maybe contradict) the corresponding provisions in the RED.

Re: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD

2017-08-03 Thread Piotr Galka
there is common understanding that if RED then no LVD but I don't like to relay on such sources if I can't understand why it is so. Do really for native English speakers it is clear that "devices shall not be subject to LVD, except as..." doesn't mean "except as. when yes"?

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-07-03 Thread Piotr Galka
not harminised standards) to use Modula A. But reading RED I'm not sure if I see the same. Regards Piotr Galka W dniu 2017-06-28 o 17:43, Scott Xe pisze: In addition to 3.1b EMC requirements, 3.1a health & safety requirements are also none of HS. It looks they deliberately arrange it. Is there

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-29 Thread Piotr Galka
A. But reading RED I'm not sure if I see the same. Regards Piotr Galka W dniu 2017-06-28 o 17:43, Scott Xe pisze: In addition to 3.1b EMC requirements, 3.1a health & safety requirements are also none of HS. It looks they deliberately arrange it. Is there any particular reason behind the s

[PSES] RED DoC and LVD

2017-08-02 Thread Piotr Galka
help in my doubts. Best Regards Piotr Galka MicroMade Poland - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> A

Re: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD

2017-08-02 Thread Piotr Galka
--Original Message----- From: Piotr Galka [mailto:piotr.ga...@micromade.pl] Sent: 02 August 2017 14:59 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD Dear list members, I'd like to know if the RED DoC should list LVD or not. RED says: 1,4.Radio equipment falling within

Re: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD

2017-08-03 Thread Piotr Galka
ternum manent. *From:*Piotr Galka [mailto:piotr.ga...@micromade.pl] *Sent:* 02 August 2017 19:39 *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* Re: [PSES] RED DoC and LVD Hi Mike, Thanks for short and long answer :) Reading RED Guide I understand: If RED than no EMCD and no LVD but it is _only_

Re: [PSES] How to find harmonised standard list?

2017-06-12 Thread Piotr Galka
Thanks, I must be blind. In my search I was there for a while, but when I saw 2004/108/EC I thought I found not current but historical information... and got back to looking for the way from directive page. Regards Piotr Galka P.S. This is third time I'm trying to answer. This time I deleted

[PSES] How to find harmonised standard list?

2017-06-12 Thread Piotr Galka
know, what I am missing? Regards Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc po

Re: [PSES] Safe powering 12V doorlock

2017-11-23 Thread Piotr Galka
Hi Rich, Thanks for confirming that isolation in doorlock can be only functional. This eliminates me one conception that 12V can be ELV, but second isolation is in doorlock. So now, as I'm sure that 12V have to be SELV/PELV I have to ask them if it is. I know that for other supplies they

Re: [PSES] Safe powering 12V doorlock

2017-11-23 Thread Piotr Galka
ower value resistances than if PELV is connected by this to other circuit is it still other circuit or they are boith the one circuit. I think It would help everyone if examples of situations in mind would be just written everywhere where PELV and SELV are defined. Regards Piotr Galka W dniu

Re: [PSES] Safe powering 12V doorlock

2017-11-23 Thread Piotr Galka
to products supplied by secondary circuit. Power supply is supplied by AC mains therefore primary circuit. For OVC II we always apply 5B. You can trust me on this since we approve many power supplies. Best regards, Bostjan -Original Message----- From: Piotr Galka [mailto:piotr.ga...@micromad

[PSES] Safe powering 12V doorlock

2017-11-22 Thread Piotr Galka
lists Access Systems so powering doorlock should be save. If it is true - where is my mistake. Best Regards Piotr Galka - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message

Re: [PSES] Safe powering 12V doorlock

2017-11-23 Thread Piotr Galka
Hi Bostjan, In 5.2.2 there is the sentence: "However, for a SECONDARY CIRCUIT that is neither connected to protective earth nor provided with a protective screen in accordance with 2.6.1 e), Table 5C shall be used." I understand that, that way it depends on output which table to select. In

Re: [PSES] Safe powering 12V doorlock

2017-11-22 Thread Piotr Galka
and Associateswww.woodjohn.uk Rayleigh, Essex UK On 2017-11-22 17:50, Piotr Galka wrote: Dear safety experts, Help me to make me sure that it is save to use the following power supply: http://www.meanwell.com/webapp/product/search.aspx?prod=DRC-40 to power 12V doorlock with not earthed 12V

Re: [PSES] Safe powering 12V doorlock

2017-11-22 Thread Piotr Galka
on the UL web site may indicate whether or not it's SELV as well as power supply class and other basic ratings. -Dave -Original Message- From: Piotr Galka [mailto:piotr.ga...@micromade.pl] Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 12:51 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Safe

Re: [PSES] Safe powering 12V doorlock

2017-11-22 Thread Piotr Galka
electric cooker. If category III then I end with 8kV testing - much more than 3kV. It is TUV approved and under Applications the producer lists Access Systems so powering doorlock should be save. If it is true - where is my mistake. Best Regards Piotr Galka