Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-06 Thread Regan Arndt
r > > > > *From:* John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk] > *Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2018 5:43 PM > *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > *Subject:* Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics > > > > There's more. The recommended format for EU DoCs, at least for electr

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-05 Thread Kunde, Brian
ance. Smile!! Isn’t that what we do or try to do? The Other Brian From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2018 2:53 PM To: Kunde, Brian; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics A typ

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-02 Thread John Woodgate
or try to do? The Other Brian *From:*John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk] *Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2018 2:53 PM *To:* Kunde, Brian; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics A typical technical non-compliance is incorrect marking of power supply data

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-02 Thread John Woodgate
; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics A typical technical non-compliance is incorrect marking of power supply data. Different standards have different requirements, and it's easy to mistakenly state, for example, the supply current when the standard

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-02 Thread Kunde, Brian
To: Kunde, Brian; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics A typical technical non-compliance is incorrect marking of power supply data. Different standards have different requirements, and it's easy to mistakenly state, for example, the supply current when

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-02 Thread John Woodgate
A typical technical non-compliance is incorrect marking of power supply data. Different standards have different requirements, and it's easy to mistakenly state, for example, the supply current when the standard requires the input power to be stated. Yes, the majority of reported violations

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-02 Thread Kunde, Brian
drifts down dark paths of no return. The Other Brian From: Regan Arndt [mailto:reganar...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 7:37 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics Hi Pete. Yes, it's a sad state of affairs. Our profession needs to do more

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-02 Thread Nyffenegger, Dave
: Friday, November 02, 2018 4:28 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics Many consumer items that fall under the LVD are dealt with under the GPSD are reported on RAPEX Many machines don’t “freely move” about the EU and the Machinery Directive

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-02 Thread Kevin Robinson
Kevin From: Charlie Blackham Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 4:28:13 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics Many consumer items that fall under the LVD are dealt with under the GPSD are reported on RAPEX Many machines

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-02 Thread Charlie Blackham
x?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f> Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 From: Regan Arndt Sent: 01 November 2018 23:37 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics Hi Pete. Yes, it's a sad state of affairs. Our profession

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-02 Thread John Woodgate
I think we have to be realistic. It is very costly to carry out technical assessments for EMC, which are the only way to detect violations. Safety is a bit different; violations can often simply be seen (or at least strongly suspected) by visual inspection, and laboratory testing may not be

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-01 Thread Regan Arndt
gt; > > > 503/452-1201 > > > > IEEE Life Fellow > > p.perk...@ieee.org > > > > *From:* Regan Arndt > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:52 PM > *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > *Subject:* Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics > > >

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-11-01 Thread Pete Perkins
Fellow <mailto:p.perk...@ieee.org> p.perk...@ieee.org From: Regan Arndt Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:52 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics Thanks Charlie. I checked the latest on the RED. Below is an excerpt on the stats. Amazing

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-10-31 Thread Regan Arndt
Thanks Charlie. I checked the latest on the RED. Below is an excerpt on the stats. Amazing. Wonder what the penalties were. h.. ADCO RED report to TCAM WG on market surveillance statistics for 2016 * 2. Results for 2016 * Totally, 13,488 R equipment has been inspected by 25 market

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-10-30 Thread Doug Nix
I’d be very interested in seeing more on this topic as well. I frequently get questions from my clients regarding EU enforcement activities. Doug Nix d...@ieee.org +1 (519) 729-5704 > On 29-Oct-18, at 19:34, Regan Arndt wrote: > > Greetings fellow members, > > > > Out of curiosity, has

Re: [PSES] CE non-conformity statistics

2018-10-29 Thread Charlie Blackham
Regan Market enforcement reports from the various “AdCos”, Administrative Cooperation Groups, can be found at http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/goods/building-blocks/market-surveillance/organisation/administrative-cooperation-groups_en under the “Documents from the AdCo Groups) As well