[Emc-users] (no subject)

2008-04-24 Thread mike
---BeginMessage--- Original Message Subject: sherline configurations From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Wed, April 23, 2008 3:31 pm To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net

[Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread mike
Can anyone tell me the right numbersto pput inn the step-config wizard in ubuntuu live emc2 for a sherline mill with wn a-axis? - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread John Thornton
Which number are you looking for? I assume it has something to do with an A axis but that is as far as I can guess... A lot more detail on what you want would help someone figure out what to tell you. John On 24 Apr 2008 at 5:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone tell me the right

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread mike
Which number are you looking for? I assume it has something to do with an A axis but that is as far as I can guess... A lot more detail on what you want would help someone figure out what to tell you. John On 24 Apr 2008 at 5:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone tell me the right

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everyone has to start somewhere. Give the guy a break. Why be part of a group when you dont want to help out? John Kasunich wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking for the numbers to put in for all four axes so that it runs properly In other words, it sounds like you know

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread Steve Stallings
There are hundreds of users out there with factory Sherline configurations running on the old BDI install and who may be interested in upgrading to EMC2. Sherline does not seem to be interested in helping them upgrade to EMC2 and I am not sure what special things were modified in the Sherline

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread Steve Stallings
In defense of John and many of the other long time EMC supporters, it is easy to get frustrated answering questions for people who seem to not be willing to try to help themselves. Newbies in many forums often fail, or seem to fail, to read any of the already available information. I do not have

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 24 April 2008, John Kasunich wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking for the numbers to put in for all four axes so that it runs properly In other words, it sounds like you know absolutely nothing about your own machine, and you want someone else to do all the work for you.

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread John Kasunich
Gene Heskett wrote: A bit rough on an obvious newbie, John. In this case, and reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the terminology and format of the questions stepconf is asking are in effect, swahili to the OP, they are quite concise because of the gui's limits. When I ran it

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread mike
Gene Heskett wrote: A bit rough on an obvious newbie, John. In this case, and reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the terminology and format of the questions stepconf is asking are in effect, swahili to the OP, they are quite concise because of the gui's limits. When I ran it

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 24 April 2008, John Kasunich wrote: Gene Heskett wrote: A bit rough on an obvious newbie, John. In this case, and reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the terminology and format of the questions stepconf is asking are in effect, swahili to the OP, they are quite concise

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread John Thornton
I agree that the integrator must put some effort into understanding the machine he/she is installing EMC into. I was the good cop this time and you were the bad cop...lol I have almost never failed to get an answer to a specific question either here or on the irc or on cnczone about EMC and

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread John Kasunich
Oops - only answered half of your question: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also the Y and Z axes run backwords In general, if it is going backwards, change the sign of the scale value. If you had 2 steps per inch and it is going the wrong way, use -2 steps per inch. Since I haven't used

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread Andrew Ayre
Mike, Assuming you are using steppers... First you need to know how many threads per inch your lead screws are for each axis. The manufacturer should be able to get you this info, or perhaps Google. Each axis could be different. Next you need to know how many steps per revolution for each

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread John Kasunich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've tried putting numbers in like 400 steps per rev .5 micro stepping and the machine only travels half the distance that you tell it to. Also the Y and Z axes run backwords and I can't figure out where to go from here. any help would be greatly appreciated. Now

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread John Thornton
On 24 Apr 2008 at 10:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike, In each axis you can test your settings and adjust them after each test. To get you in the ball park use a ruler and move 1 if you only get 1/2 the you need twice as many steps. If you don't know the specifics about your machine you

[Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread mike
Thank you all for all your wonderful help, I think now I'll be able to get my mill to run properly.---BeginMessage--- Thank you all for all your wonderful help, I think now I'll be able to get my mill to run properly. ---End Message---

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then, dont call this EMC-users Rather change this to EMC-Developers and have no users. or, if someone doesn't have something positive to say to a rudimentary question then don't participate. A user's list is for exactly that with questions from beginner to advanced. If folks want to complain

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread James Reed
Mny times, the person asking the question is doing so because he is lost as to what could be the problem. Without someone to tell him what is important, how does he know what to say? Often the first cry for help is expected to be a opener so you can tell him what is important and what is

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 24 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gene Heskett wrote: A bit rough on an obvious newbie, John. In this case, and reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the terminology and format of the questions stepconf is asking are in effect, swahili to the OP, they are quite

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 24 April 2008, Gene Heskett wrote: On Thursday 24 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gene Heskett wrote: A bit rough on an obvious newbie, John. In this case, and reading between the lines, I'm guessing that the terminology and format of the questions stepconf is asking are in

[Emc-users] Classicladder

2008-04-24 Thread Dave Keeton
Just to clarify, Has MODBUS been enabled in classicladder in the latest EMC release? If so, how exactly do you enable it? I understand how to enable it in TCP in but I haven't quite figured out the serial in the stand alone version.Can some one point me to a reference for how to set up the

Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations

2008-04-24 Thread Stuart Stevenson
Message: 3 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:13:11 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain;

Re: [Emc-users] Classicladder

2008-04-24 Thread Jeff Epler
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:17:16PM -0400, Dave Keeton wrote: Just to clarify, Has MODBUS been enabled in classicladder in the latest EMC release? No. The version of classicladder in emc 2.2.4 and the soon-to-be-released 2.2.5 does not include modbus support. Jeff

Re: [Emc-users] Classicladder

2008-04-24 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 21:24 -0500, Jeff Epler wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:17:16PM -0400, Dave Keeton wrote: Just to clarify, Has MODBUS been enabled in classicladder in the latest EMC release? No. The version of classicladder in emc 2.2.4 and the soon-to-be-released 2.2.5 does not