2010/7/23 Nicolas HENRY nicolas...@free.fr:
Perhaps :
Kicad or Qucs ( but electronics orientation)
Le jeudi 22 juillet 2010, Thomas Powderly a écrit :
Stuart
I have use Kicad almost 1 year, and this perfect Schematic PCB
layout design, If you want simulated your schematic you should try
Very nice. Can you provide some details as to what kind of controllers,
drives, screws, etc... You are using?
Sure thing.
For the electronic part i use a simple self build 3-axis L297/L298
stepper driver which is interfaced to the parallel port of the pc.
In the mechanical part i'm
Hello,
Are there any plans by now, when emc packages for ubuntu 10.04 should
be available ?
Thanks for your Work.
Bye,
Wolfgang Koebler
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the
Check out VIACAD from punchcad.
Very solid and scary cheap.
Rainer
On Jul 23, 2010, at 4:59 AM, kurniadi wrote:
2010/7/23 Nicolas HENRY nicolas...@free.fr:
Perhaps :
Kicad or Qucs ( but electronics orientation)
Le jeudi 22 juillet 2010, Thomas Powderly a écrit :
Stuart
I have use
Thanks for the reply Kirk. Having explained it, would you (or anyone) mind
translating the following generic sample to net without deleting any signal
names? :
newsig signalnameA bit
newsig signalnameB bit
newsig signalnameC bit
linksp signalnameA = inputpin1
linksp signalnameA =
James Louis wrote:
Thanks for the reply Kirk. Having explained it, would you (or anyone) mind
translating the following generic sample to net without deleting any signal
names? :
newsig signalnameA bit
newsig signalnameB bit
newsig signalnameC bit
linksp signalnameA= inputpin1
linksp
On 23 July 2010 13:27, James Louis james.lo...@gastechnology.org wrote:
Thanks for the reply Kirk. Having explained it, would you (or anyone) mind
translating the following generic sample to net without deleting any signal
names? :
I am curious about why you wish to retain both signal
Does anyone happen to have a completed (or process to complete one)
equation for forward kinematics to solve the following structure?
Origin Fixed point (A) -- Joint Length (L1) -- Wrist (F) -- Elbow (B)
-- Joint Length (L2) -- Wrist (G) -- Elbow (C) -- Joint Length (L3)
-- Wrist (H) -- Elbow
All good points. I was trying to retain signal names for Hal configuration
watch set up.
I'll do some translating this weekend.
Thanks guys!
-Original Message-
From: Andy Pugh [mailto:a...@andypugh.fsnet.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 7:59 AM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
On 23 July 2010 15:36, Ted Hyde laser...@gmail.com wrote:
I've pushed through a lot of the DH descriptors - but to be honest, my
few remaining brain cells just aren't up to the task of multiplying and
transforming 6 4x4 matricies anymore (if they ever were!)- of which I
probably would get it
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 07:27 -0500, James Louis wrote:
Thanks for the reply Kirk. Having explained it, would you (or anyone) mind
translating the following generic sample to net without deleting any signal
names? :
newsig signalnameA bit
newsig signalnameB bit
newsig signalnameC bit
Kirk Wallace wrote:
You may have only one output pin attached to a signal name (or think of
a signal name as a wire name), with one or more pins attached that
accept input. There can only be one boss per signal (or wire). You
should be able to assign a single output pin to more than one signal
James Louis wrote:
Thanks for the reply Kirk. Having explained it, would you (or anyone) mind
translating the following generic sample to net without deleting any signal
names? :
newsig signalnameA bit
newsig signalnameB bit
newsig signalnameC bit
linksp signalnameA = inputpin1
linksp
Andy Pugh wrote:
I am curious about why you wish to retain both signal names? The
signal will only ever take one value, after all.
(I am actually not entirely sure why we have signal names at all,
other than making Halscope a little easier to setup)
Due to the hideous way I constructed
This is easily handled by genserkins.
genserkins = general serial kinematics (e.g. kins where each joint is
serially connected to the previous one).
Take a look at the (very brief) description of how I set up genserkins
for a puma560:
http://juve.ro/blog/puma
You would have to translate your
Hi everybody! For gantry milling mashine it is necessary to synchronize two
motors on one axis. Andy Pugh wrote:If you really want to just slave one
axis to another, you could try :
net
Hey Folks:
I feel silly asking this question, but here goes. I ran into an issue using
peck drilling with the tool retract. The end result was my Z stepper was
missing pulses on the retract. So I've derated the max accel and vel on the Z
axis and everything looks good, however what I'd
On 23 July 2010 18:35, Andrey stormbringe...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi everybody! For gantry milling mashine it is necessary to synchronize two
motors on one axis. Andy Pugh wrote:If you really want to just slave one
axis to another, you could try :
Normally the last thing you want to ever do on a stepper system is
disable, you can then lose steps, there is no guarantee than they will
maintain position when powered off and may even jump to another
position when powered back on.
Dave Caroline
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Speaker To-Dirt
kurniadi wrote:
I have use Kicad almost 1 year, and this perfect Schematic PCB
layout design,
I second that recommendation - I've used proprietary packages that lack
features found in kicad.
Karl Schmidt
On 23 July 2010 18:47, Speaker To-Dirt speaker_2_d...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is there something I'm missing? I'm sure there has to be a way to do this,
and I'm sure it staring me in the face. Can someone show me how stupid I am
and point this out to me?
As far as I know there is no such command
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Speaker To-Dirt
speaker_2_d...@yahoo.comwrote:
Hey Folks:
I feel silly asking this question, but here goes. I ran into an issue
using peck drilling with the tool retract. The end result was my Z stepper
was missing pulses on the retract. So I've derated the
Hey All:
Thanks for the fast replies. Hummm. I thought of turning off outputs to
the parallel port, but wanted something I could use as a fast test of
individual axes on individual programs. What I did do was comment out all
motion in the XY plane and keep all the Z motion. But that
Hi,
I have some nice Plugs on my stepper, so I could just remove them for
testing purposes :)
Am 23.07.2010 20:45, schrieb Speaker To-Dirt:
Hey All:
Thanks for the fast replies. Hummm. I thought of turning off outputs
to the parallel port, but wanted something I could use as a
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 11:45 -0700, Speaker To-Dirt wrote:
Hey All:
Thanks for the fast replies. Hummm. I thought of turning off
outputs to the parallel port, but wanted something I could use as a
fast test of individual axes on individual programs. What I did do was
comment out all
On 23 July 2010 18:35, Andrey stormbringe...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi everybody! For gantry milling mashine it is necessary to synchronize two
motors on one axis. Andy Pugh wrote:If you really want to just slave one
axis to another, you could try :
net Xpos-cmd axis.0.motor-pos-cmd =
Jon is right, you cannot. Unless you are running pre-2.2.x EMC2. Quote from
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?UPDATING:
3.4. double-linking of pins is now treated as an error
halcmd and hal_link() now refuse to link an already-linked pin. This
immediately diagnoses configuration
Speaker To-Dirt wrote:
Hey All:
Thanks for the fast replies. Hummm. I thought of turning off outputs
to the parallel port, but wanted something I could use as a fast test of
individual axes on individual programs. What I did do was comment out all
motion in the XY plane and keep
James Louis wrote:
Jon is right, you cannot. Unless you are running pre-2.2.x EMC2. Quote from
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?UPDATING:
3.4. double-linking of pins is now treated as an error
halcmd and hal_link() now refuse to link an already-linked pin. This
immediately
James Louis wrote:
Jon is right, you cannot. Unless you are running pre-2.2.x EMC2.
Quote from http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?UPDATING:
3.4. double-linking of pins is now treated as an error
halcmd and hal_link() now refuse to link an already-linked pin. This
immediately
Many thanks ,Andy, for your answer. I will follow your recommendations, I hope
that you do not deny assistance to me,if I have difficulties with my HAL file.
Your advices very much help me.
Andrey
--
This SF.net
Thank you both for the clarification. I officially withdraw my lesson learned
and replace it as such: This mailing list rocks.
- Original Message -
From: John Kasunich jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Fri Jul 23 15:19:16
Stuart didnt say what he expected/wanted to find
but today i spent with one system installing AcadE and another running GEDA
I envision drawing a schematic showing the relational connections,
like mains swx to fuses to filters to distribution to safety relays to
servo drives
nad int he
James Louis wrote:
Lesson learned: Never upgrade a working machine.
No, the lesson should be that you upgrade only for a specific reason
that requires it, and always be ready to accept that there could be
unexpected problems that crop up and have to be debugged. This is true
for simple PC
Nice setup. Looks like it works nice and smooth.
Maybe it's just my inexperience, but I haven't seen hold down clamps like
that before. Can you describe/show how they work? They look pretty cool.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Fox Mulder [mailto:quakem...@gmx.net]
Sent:
On 07/23/2010 04:34 AM, wk-l...@koebler.com wrote:
Are there any plans by now, when emc packages for ubuntu 10.04 should
be available ?
I just added Lucid (Ubuntu 10.04) packages of emc2, in Simulation
*only*, to the buildbot: http://emc2-buildbot.colorado.edu/~buildmaster/
We don't have
36 matches
Mail list logo
