Re: [Emc-users] OT - Arduino development - Atmel ICE useful ?

>>Good luck and let us know how you get on. Just some feedback on this Atmel ICE and Atmel Studio 7. I loaded it up today and connected it to a Arduino Uno Clone ($10 off Amazon). Atmel Studio 7 is really nice! I followed the example in the link here:

Re: [Emc-users] OT - R Drive AntiBacklash

On Saturday 25 February 2017 16:13:23 bari wrote: > On 02/25/2017 02:17 PM, Tomaz T. wrote: > > I'm in doing a little research on replacing "low pitch" slow > > ballscrews with faster R and found this anti backlash system: > > > > > >

[Emc-users] Problem with genserkins

I am having some issues with genserkins running a robot arm (this is the ST R-17 I brought with me to Wichita running LinuxCNC with joints-axis running on Debian Wheezy with RTAI). Coordinated moves in XYZ seem to work as expected. All the joints working together to keep the end of the arm

[Emc-users] encoder Q too

Greetings all; I note the encoder module does not specifically have a "direction" output. Is it sufficient to run the velocity thru a wcomp, compare to 0., and use the over/under pins for multiswitche's direction to count? Seems like it ought to work so I'll hack up some more hal code.

Re: [Emc-users] OT - R Drive AntiBacklash

On 02/25/2017 02:17 PM, Tomaz T. wrote: > I'm in doing a little research on replacing "low pitch" slow ballscrews with > faster R and found this anti backlash system: > > > https://www.damencnc.com/en/components/mechanical-parts/rack---pinion/320 > > > > Does anyone here use it, and is it worth

[Emc-users] OT - R Drive AntiBacklash

I'm in doing a little research on replacing "low pitch" slow ballscrews with faster R and found this anti backlash system: https://www.damencnc.com/en/components/mechanical-parts/rack---pinion/320 Does anyone here use it, and is it worth of investment compared to single pinion "standard"

[Emc-users] multiswitch Q's

Hi all; Couple problems with multiswitch. Default output for no input is 0001, not . Why? Cannot be loadrt'd with the names= option. cfg=4,4 works fine. Why? I would really like to use the state as the default, gain=1.0 position. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be

Re: [Emc-users] OT - Arduino development - Atmel ICE useful ?

That's really interesting. Thanks for the link. I read some things before about the Arduino overhead impacting user code. That is a glaring example. I'm trying to stay as generic as possible.. if I need to dip into the hardware specifics because of the overhead in the Arduino I will, but it

Re: [Emc-users] OT - Arduino development - Atmel ICE useful ?

I vaguely recall the subject coming up in one of the Propeller columns in ""Nuts'nVolts"" Magazine. You may want to search there. R. - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 10:14 AM Subject: Re: [Emc-users] OT

Re: [Emc-users] OT - Arduino development - Atmel ICE useful ?

On 02/25/2017 09:22 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote: > Once I've built familiarity with a chip family's peripherals, and a > debugged library of routines to use them, then it is just dufus to rock > up with "My cpu core is sexier than yours." They all execute code > reliably, so the core is quite

Re: [Emc-users] OT - Arduino development - Atmel ICE useful ?

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 19:22:38 +1100 Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 24.02.17 15:18, Stephen Dubovsky wrote: > > If you have to use on chip peripherals such as DMA, ADC, or PWM you very > > much have to "learn a chip" (some are part of the core, some are part of > > the

Re: [Emc-users] OT - Arduino development - Atmel ICE useful ?

On 24.02.17 15:18, Stephen Dubovsky wrote: > If you have to use on chip peripherals such as DMA, ADC, or PWM you very > much have to "learn a chip" (some are part of the core, some are part of > the silicon manufacturer implementation.) An Arduino OS will sield you > from much of that but if