On 13 August 2015 at 02:35, Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com wrote:
He suggested that codes in remap that create queue-busters
can create problems do to some flow control weakness in
tastaskk/interp.
Yes, including M66 in G-code subs.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
I have a program with threading G33 that will run if I take the threading
out of it but throw an error of Bug: Call Stack Under Run if I leave the
threading in the program. We use a post processor for our programs and have
done threading in the past but this one is persistent. Any Ideas?
I'm not trying to do anything special, or use any thing special, That
was just what I managed to cobble together to get those m-code functions
together, they worked, so I left them alone,
All I am trying to accomplish is when the operator enters a M41 (or
whichever of my remapped codes ), it
Correct, I did not modify any code for those signals, that was just the
name I gave them.
As for the tool change, I am using Chris Morley's remap in python,
# This is a component of LinuxCNC
# Copyright 2014 Chris Morley
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
On 7/15/15 12:06 PM, Rick wrote:
But why would that work OK at any other time?
I don't know.
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the
I have 16GB of ram, and an 80GB HD, with only about 5GB of data on it.
Rick
On 07/15/2015 01:39 PM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.com
wrote:
On 7/15/15 11:24 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
What are the limitations on program size?
space
On 7/15/15 10:59 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
I'm not trying to do anything special, or use any thing special, That
was just what I managed to cobble together to get those m-code functions
together, they worked, so I left them alone,
All I am trying to accomplish is when the operator enters a M41 (or
What are the limitations on program size?
On 7/15/2015 1:14 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 7/15/15 10:59 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
I'm not trying to do anything special, or use any thing special, That
was just what I managed to cobble together to get those m-code functions
together, they
You're running in to the error on line 617 in this function:
http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=linuxcnc.git;a=blob;f=src/emc/rs274ngc/interp_o_word.cc;h=084631e898b3ce00a9e5df5316b636fbe8bed1a8;hb=refs/heads/2.6#l612
I don't know the cause yet, but i bet it's related to the fanuc T-word
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.com
wrote:
On 7/15/15 11:24 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
What are the limitations on program size?
space in ram memory? / on hard drive?
None that i know of.
I've personally run a program with 7500 lines, 147 kB in size, and I
But why would that work OK at any other time?
Rick
On 07/15/2015 01:50 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
You're running in to the error on line 617 in this function:
Will do,
Rick
On 07/15/2015 01:50 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
You're running in to the error on line 617 in this function:
http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=linuxcnc.git;a=blob;f=src/emc/rs274ngc/interp_o_word.cc;h=084631e898b3ce00a9e5df5316b636fbe8bed1a8;hb=refs/heads/2.6#l612
I don't
On 7/15/15 11:24 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
What are the limitations on program size?
None that i know of.
I've personally run a program with 7500 lines, 147 kB in size, and I
expect much bigger should work without any problems.
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
On Wednesday 15 July 2015 13:24:25 Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 7/15/15 11:24 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
What are the limitations on program size?
None that i know of.
I've personally run a program with 7500 lines, 147 kB in size, and I
expect much bigger should work without any problems.
Here is a copy of my INI file for this machine, showing the remapped codes,
On 7/15/2015 11:53 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Your M-codes are poking Motion pins that don't exist in LinuxCNC.
You must be using some other version, or be using some local patches, or
something. That will make
Your M-codes are poking Motion pins that don't exist in LinuxCNC.
You must be using some other version, or be using some local patches, or
something. That will make this hard for anyone but you to debug.
On 7/15/15 9:36 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
Here are the codes,
And you are correct, bytes
What is the proper way then to do that, take for instance the M41, it is
supposed to signal the low gear change command.
I put those together then 3 yrs ago, and they are on all three machines.
It was the only way I could figure out, with my limited knowledge, how
to get things to work,
Rick
Here are the codes,
And you are correct, bytes not kilobytes,
On 7/15/2015 11:20 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 7/15/15 8:54 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
Hello Seb,
I have been working on this all week, I have run this program numerous
times on my simulator test PC in my office without any
Lair [mailto:r...@superiorroll.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 10:54 AM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Bug:Call Stack Under run
Hello Seb,
I have been working on this all week, I have run this program numerous
times
on my simulator test PC in my office
This error is showing up on 2.6.4 and 2.6.8. The machine was 2.6.4
yesterday morning, so we updated it 2.6.8 thinking that might fix it.
Rick
On 7/15/2015 11:20 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 7/15/15 8:54 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
Hello Seb,
I have been working on this all week, I have run
On 7/15/15 9:36 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
Here are the codes,
And you are correct, bytes not kilobytes,
Which version of LinuxCNC are you using?
On 7/15/2015 11:20 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 7/15/15 8:54 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
Hello Seb,
I have been working on this all week, I have
Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Bug:Call Stack Under run
Hello Seb,
I have been working on this all week, I have run this program numerous
times
on my simulator test PC in my office without any issue, as soon as I try
to run it
on the machine, it gives us this fault
Hello Seb,
I have been working on this all week, I have run this program numerous
times on my simulator test PC in my office without any issue, as soon as
I try to run it on the machine, it gives us this fault. This morning I
made a new config using the Axis GUI, and it gives us the same
On 7/15/15 8:54 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
Hello Seb,
I have been working on this all week, I have run this program numerous
times on my simulator test PC in my office without any issue, as soon as
I try to run it on the machine, it gives us this fault. This morning I
made a new config using the
On 7/15/15 10:00 AM, Rick Lair wrote:
What is the proper way then to do that, take for instance the M41, it is
supposed to signal the low gear change command.
I put those together then 3 yrs ago, and they are on all three machines.
It was the only way I could figure out, with my limited
On 7/10/15 3:43 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
I have a program with threading G33 that will run if I take the threading
out of it but throw an error of Bug: Call Stack Under Run if I leave the
threading in the program. We use a post processor for our programs and have
done threading in the past but
26 matches
Mail list logo
