On Wed, 21 May 2014 08:31:19 -0400, you wrote:
Since lcnc has no clue about the ballistics of the reverse, and therefore
cannot predict the over travel, I'm not sure there can be a fix for that
other than setting the -limit well into the chuck.
My neg working units limit is often well into
On Thursday 22 May 2014 03:25:24 Steve Blackmore did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Wed, 21 May 2014 08:31:19 -0400, you wrote:
Since lcnc has no clue about the ballistics of the reverse, and
therefore cannot predict the over travel, I'm not sure there can be a
fix for that other than setting
On Thu, 22 May 2014 08:20:45 -0400, you wrote:
However - I don't use home in LinuxCNC, it's not lathe friendly -
I don't find it all that helpful for other than reestablishing positions
after a forced shut down in the middle of a job, chip broke, whatever.
I don't even find that much use -
On 5/22/2014 6:20 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Cutting off is a PIMA on this piece of rubber, and I finally wrote a
routine that will work for one cutoff per cutoff blade sharpening. It
goes inward about .2mm then pulls back before it can dig in and lock
things up, then moves .5mm sideways and
On Thursday 22 May 2014 19:14:52 Gregg Eshelman did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 5/22/2014 6:20 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Cutting off is a PIMA on this piece of rubber, and I finally wrote a
routine that will work for one cutoff per cutoff blade sharpening.
It goes inward about .2mm then
On 05/20/2014 08:39 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings docs maintainers;
I found this after noon that there is a large interaction between the
driveline value, and the J and K values.
My understanding from studying the G76 source is that the J value is
intended to be depth of cut for the
On Tue, 20 May 2014 23:39:28 -0400, you wrote:
Greetings docs maintainers;
I expect those interactions were expected to be self-evident by the
guru's, but from the docs, its not all that well explained.
Hi Gene - I've never used the G76 in Linuxcnc but it certainly looks
different to the Mach
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 01:59:34 Kirk Wallace did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 05/20/2014 08:39 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings docs maintainers;
I found this after noon that there is a large interaction between the
driveline value, and the J and K values.
My understanding from
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 03:13:10 Steve Blackmore did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Tue, 20 May 2014 23:39:28 -0400, you wrote:
Greetings docs maintainers;
I expect those interactions were expected to be self-evident by the
guru's, but from the docs, its not all that well explained.
Hi
On 05/21/2014 05:07 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
...
raising the squeak to several kilohertz. So most of my threads are 40 to
50 pass, 5 to 10 minutes runtime affairs, to get a decent looking thread.
For a thread of that size (19,5 mm), make J about one quarter to one
third of K, maybe even half
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 10:30:44 Kirk Wallace did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 05/21/2014 05:07 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
...
raising the squeak to several kilohertz. So most of my threads are
40 to 50 pass, 5 to 10 minutes runtime affairs, to get a decent
looking thread.
For a thread
Greetings docs maintainers;
I found this after noon that there is a large interaction between the
driveline value, and the J and K values.
I believe it should be pointed out that all 3 interact. I made some mods
to my wrapper script a few days ago that resulted in only 3 passes to cut
the
12 matches
Mail list logo
