For those of you always looking for a cooler, better
hardware platform for LinuxCNC, check out:
http://www.parallella.org/board/
This is an Arm board using a Xilinx Zynq FPGA for
processor and logic. It also has 16-core GPU type
device. I don't know how or when real-time support
will be added.
Yep. You could run 64 machines in parallel!
I was looking at this a couple of days ago. Very neat board, but not sure
if it's right fit for linuxcnc.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Ralph Stirling
ralph.stirl...@wallawalla.edu wrote:
For those of you always looking for a cooler, better
On 24 July 2013 16:50, Troy Jacobson t...@thismuch.net wrote:
I was looking at this a couple of days ago. Very neat board, but not sure
if it's right fit for linuxcnc.
If the FPGA can be persuaded to run the Hostmot2 Firmware then it
could run two Mesa daughterboards from the GPIO connector.
benefit
fewer people than a board like the Beaglebone Black,
which looks to be achieving good market acceptance.
-- Ralph
From: andy pugh [bodge...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:58 AM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users
On 7/24/2013 11:13 AM, Ralph Stirling wrote:
Hostmot2 should have no trouble fitting. The
ARM-9 in the Zynq is 2-core, and has a double
precision vector FPU. The bigger problem I see
is that the Parallela is more of a nitch product,
so the effort of porting LinuxCNC to it would benefit
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Parallela board
On 7/24/2013 11:13 AM, Ralph Stirling wrote:
Hostmot2 should have no trouble fitting. The
ARM-9 in the Zynq is 2-core, and has a double
precision vector FPU. The bigger problem I see
is that the Parallela is more of a nitch product,
so
It has OpenCL support +48 fpga i/o's, so it's nice fit for machine
vision + Linuxcnc.
http://www.parallella.org/2013/03/08/introduction-to-parallella-and-opencl/?doing_wp_cron=1374709685.5858869552612304687500
http://www.khronos.org/opencl/
Just curious, how much does LinuxCNC benefit (or not) from multiple
processors or 'cores'?
Some software does well, others need 'vertical mips' rather than
'horizontal mips' (to use some old terms). Linux handles multiple
processors pretty well, the focus of this question is on LinuxCNC as
an
On 7/24/2013 7:25 PM, Jack Coats wrote:
Just curious, how much does LinuxCNC benefit (or not) from multiple
processors or 'cores'?
From what I know (and I'm *NOT* a core developer) it helps quite a bit
to have a few cores, but LinuxCNC doesn't really scale well to lots of
cores.
Basically if
: [Emc-users] Parallela board
On 7/24/2013 7:25 PM, Jack Coats wrote:
Just curious, how much does LinuxCNC benefit (or not) from multiple
processors or 'cores'?
From what I know (and I'm *NOT* a core developer) it helps quite a bit
to have a few cores, but LinuxCNC doesn't really scale well
10 matches
Mail list logo