On Wednesday 23 April 2014 23:47:35 andy pugh did opine:
> On 24 April 2014 00:46, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Can you bore a .242" socket, .240" deep? I have not found a boring
> > bar that small.
>
> Horn do boring bars down to 0.2mm.
> I have several of the larger ones and they work very nicely
On 04/23/2014 12:06 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 23 April 2014 16:57, Jon Elson wrote:
>> Andy Pugh suggested you could run my PWM servo amps with
>> just ONE wire/output pin
> What I was meaning was that it only needed one PWM channel, rather
> than the phase-locked 3-phase PWM that the 7i39 needs.
On 24 April 2014 00:46, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Can you bore a .242" socket, .240" deep? I have not found a boring bar
> that small.
Horn do boring bars down to 0.2mm.
I have several of the larger ones and they work very nicely indeed.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/171244366289
You need a holder with
On Wednesday 23 April 2014 19:41:34 Steve Blackmore did opine:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 22:36:05 +0100, you wrote:
> >On 23 April 2014 22:17, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> 1. Since the tool post may get turned a few degrees to facilitate a
> >> boring operation, how do you go about ascertaining that the
On Wednesday 23 April 2014 18:05:33 andy pugh did opine:
> On 23 April 2014 22:17, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > 1. Since the tool post may get turned a few degrees to facilitate a
> > boring operation, how do you go about ascertaining that the tool post
> > is truly square so you don't have to re-inv
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 22:36:05 +0100, you wrote:
>On 23 April 2014 22:17, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>> 1. Since the tool post may get turned a few degrees to facilitate a boring
>> operation, how do you go about ascertaining that the tool post is truly
>> square so you don't have to re-invent a new to
On 23 April 2014 22:17, Gene Heskett wrote:
> 1. Since the tool post may get turned a few degrees to facilitate a boring
> operation, how do you go about ascertaining that the tool post is truly
> square so you don't have to re-invent a new tool table when its been turned
> or moved?
I never tu
Greetings;
I now have it homing well enough that I can consider trying to build a tool
table.
But first, since I own no method of tool holding that is truly fixed, with
most of it being insert carrying stuff in QC holders, my question now is in
two parts.
1. Since the tool post may get turne
Hi Andy
>> Andy Pugh suggested you could run my PWM servo amps with
>> just ONE wire/output pin
>
> What I was meaning was that it only needed one PWM channel, rather
> than the phase-locked 3-phase PWM that the 7i39 needs.
> I wasn't suggesting that it didn't also need direction, enable etc pins
On 23 April 2014 16:57, Jon Elson wrote:
> Andy Pugh suggested you could run my PWM servo amps with
> just ONE wire/output pin
What I was meaning was that it only needed one PWM channel, rather
than the phase-locked 3-phase PWM that the 7i39 needs.
I wasn't suggesting that it didn't also need dir
Hi Jon
> Andy Pugh suggested you could run my PWM servo amps with
> just ONE wire/output pin. That is what I was referring to,
> and that two wires would be better.
Ah, OK. Got it. Thank for the clarification.
> With sign/magnitude control, there is no output
> until the PWM signal has pulses
On 04/23/2014 09:07 AM, Florian Rist wrote:
> Hi Jon
>
http://www.pico-systems.com/acservo.html
>>> Ah, I see that would make thinks much easier.
>> You COULD, in theory, run it with just the Direction signal in
>> synchronous antiphase mode, but this may cause the
>> filter inductors (and may
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Florian Rist wrote:
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:24:42 +0200
From: Florian Rist
Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-users] Motion Synchronization to ext. trigger? (BeagleBone Back
+ Mesa 7I39, Machinekit?)
H
Am 23.04.2014 um 11:42 schrieb Viesturs Lācis :
> 2014-04-08 14:19 GMT-04:00 Michael Haberler :
>
>> [I posted this to the machinekit list, but since there is interest in both
>> features I share it here too. -m]
>>
>>
>> There was significant interest in the basic HAL-based Jog-while-paused
>
Hi Jon
>>> http://www.pico-systems.com/acservo.html
>>
>> Ah, I see that would make thinks much easier.
>
> You COULD, in theory, run it with just the Direction signal in
> synchronous antiphase mode, but this may cause the
> filter inductors (and maybe the motor, too) to run hot.
> Our servo amp
Bas
I have been following you posts on the temp control problem. I just
though, why dont you sense the temp with an external device and then use
a component to control the temperature. You could even use the pid
component together with your own component. You could also sync the
control with th
Hi Guys,
Here’s me nagging again about temperature, M106, M109, fan control etcetera.
I’d like to know from you if/how you want to proceed with Additive
Manufacturing and Machinekit.
I’m running my Delta style machine with Machinekit and BeBoPr-Bridge, printing
happily, no problems there.
H
I'm working on a checkbook program and I noticed that if you use a REAL
field and store 1.00 into it it only stores the 1 so I just use text now
to store numbers.
JT
On 4/22/2014 10:23 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> What sort of contortions are required to fully recover a number stored in
> SQLite a
2014-04-08 14:19 GMT-04:00 Michael Haberler :
> [I posted this to the machinekit list, but since there is interest in both
> features I share it here too. -m]
>
>
> There was significant interest in the basic HAL-based Jog-while-paused
> support I did a while ago; that too was never merged mainlin
19 matches
Mail list logo
