Galvanic corrosion from different metals in contact with any amount of
moisture. Running electricity through the contact makes it worse.
The only way aluminum wiring meets code is with a copper pigtail between it and
any screwed down or push in connection. There are special crimp sleeves and
Pretty simple. There's a vertical dial indicator on top, which doesn't rotate.
The rods fit into the bottom part that does rotate. If the ID or OD it's
touching isn't precisely centered, the rod wiggles back and forth, causing
another part to move up and down as the rod spins around.
Sort of
Or you could get a coaxial indicator like
this.http://www.ebay.com/itm/262647994320
From: Gene Heskett
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 7:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] pressure equalizer method around ball nut
Film at 11,
Regular industrial building.
Main is 480v 3ph
1 step down to 120
On Oct 7, 2016 2:06 PM, "Ed" wrote:
> What power is available? 240V 3 phase I hope?
>
>
>
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on
Greetings to PCW;
I have a 2nd apparent failure of a 5i25, affecting the same p3-15 pin.
So I am suspecting I have a bad BoB or home rolled cable.
I have a perfectly good 4.77 volts at the BoB's input, which does go to
ground if I touch the wire to the machine frame, but it is not getting
On 7 October 2016 at 20:55, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> If the alumina layer is thickened (e.g. by anodization), the aluminum
> objects will be isolated;
I will also note the apparent conductivity of my anodized
solder-sucker. But that is probably a think anodised
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:08 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 7 October 2016 at 17:09, Dave Cole wrote:
> >
> > Does this give me a clue?
> > https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_aluminium_and_
> its_oxide_electrical_properties2
>
> It seems to be lots
On 7 October 2016 at 20:08, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Force one probe to actually dent the surface so you know you are making a
> connection WITH that probe. Then lay, or let gently swing to touch a
> clean looking spot, the other probe, without using the point, or a sharp
>
On Friday 07 October 2016 12:09:35 Dave Cole wrote:
> On 10/7/2016 11:48 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> > On 7 October 2016 at 15:47, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> >>> I have never found aluminium to be non-conductive.
> >>
> >> Its a good conductor, IF you can achieve a 'gas tight'
On Friday 07 October 2016 11:48:07 andy pugh wrote:
> On 7 October 2016 at 15:47, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> I have never found aluminium to be non-conductive.
> >
> > Its a good conductor, IF you can achieve a 'gas tight' connection,
> > AND maintain it for decades.
>
> No,
What power is available? 240V 3 phase I hope?
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
On 7 October 2016 at 17:09, Dave Cole wrote:
>
> Does this give me a clue?
> https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_aluminium_and_its_oxide_electrical_properties2
It seems to be lots of people saying "Aluminium is non-conducting"
without doing the simple test with a
On 10/7/2016 11:48 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 7 October 2016 at 15:47, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> I have never found aluminium to be non-conductive.
>>>
>> Its a good conductor, IF you can achieve a 'gas tight' connection, AND
>> maintain it for decades.
> No, really. Get some
On 7 October 2016 at 15:47, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I have never found aluminium to be non-conductive.
>>
> Its a good conductor, IF you can achieve a 'gas tight' connection, AND
> maintain it for decades.
No, really. Get some aluminium and your multimeter. You will find
On Friday 07 October 2016 10:34:19 Roland Jollivet wrote:
> On 6 October 2016 at 17:27, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 October 2016 09:54:59 andy pugh wrote:
> > > On 6 October 2016 at 12:32, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > > > Anybody got a better
On Friday 07 October 2016 09:46:22 andy pugh wrote:
> On 7 October 2016 at 14:33, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > It all gets complex fast when dealing with alu and
> > its instant oxidation.
>
> I have never found aluminium to be non-conductive.
>
Its a good conductor, IF you
On 6 October 2016 at 17:27, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 06 October 2016 09:54:59 andy pugh wrote:
>
> > On 6 October 2016 at 12:32, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > Anybody got a better idea than sacrificing two of the six bolt
> > > positions to make
On 7 October 2016 at 14:33, Gene Heskett wrote:
> It all gets complex fast when dealing with alu and
> its instant oxidation.
I have never found aluminium to be non-conductive.
You could consider using one of these instead of a probe:
On Thursday 06 October 2016 11:27:46 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 06 October 2016 09:54:59 andy pugh wrote:
> > On 6 October 2016 at 12:32, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > > Anybody got a better idea than sacrificing two of the six bolt
> > > positions to make the coupling
19 matches
Mail list logo