I tried this about 6 months ago.. It was about 95% there.. (Lutris) My
account, My drawing...
https://photos.app.goo.gl/5PMsUnD4KAFyEFkF6
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 8:32 PM Chris Albertson
wrote:
> I run Fusion 360 on Linux inside a virtual machine. I use VMware and then
> Windows 10 and then
Marcus wrote
The problem with Fusion 3690 CAD_to_CAM is the additional cost: 1000GBP
CAM is included with Fusion 360 additional machining extensions are extra
but not needed for most work.
John Figie
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022, 5:44 PM wrote:
> On 2022-10-21 17:07, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> >
I run Fusion 360 on Linux inside a virtual machine. I use VMware and then
Windows 10 and then Fusion 360. This works well if you have a computer
with enough RAM and CPU cores, and a good enough graphics card. I keep the
VM image on an M.2 FLASH memory that is very fast
Inside VMware, you can
I use fusion on both windows and Mac. Mostly Mac.
Matthew Herd
> On Oct 21, 2022, at 6:52 PM, Martin Dobbins wrote:
>
> So, following on from the CAM discussion and all the love shown to Fusion 360
>
> Has anyone tried:
>
> https://all3dp.com/2/fusion-360-for-linux-how-to-install-it/
>
>
So, following on from the CAM discussion and all the love shown to Fusion 360
Has anyone tried:
https://all3dp.com/2/fusion-360-for-linux-how-to-install-it/
or something similar?
Or do you all use Windows or Mac?
Martin
___
Emc-users mailing list
On 2022-10-21 17:07, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
piektd., 2022. g. 21. okt., plkst. 20:21 — lietotājs John Dammeyer
() rakstīja:
What is out there for CAM G-Code generation? Preferably integrated
with with the CAD package so one can go back and forth to tweak a
drawing for better CAM without
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 20:06, John Figie wrote:
>
> I use Fusion 360 paid subscription that I got several years ago
I use F360 too, though rather hate myself for it.
But I have been using Autocad in various guises since the 1990s and at
this point I don't need yet another hobby.
--
atp
"A
piektd., 2022. g. 21. okt., plkst. 20:21 — lietotājs John Dammeyer
() rakstīja:
>
> What is out there for CAM G-Code generation? Preferably integrated with with
> the CAD package so one can go back and forth to tweak a drawing for better
> CAM without having to start all over again with the
I'm puzzled.
No one has mentioned, positive or negative
https://mecsoft.com/products/
John
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
On 2022-10-21 18:54, Robin Szemeti via Emc-users wrote:
For CAM I use Cut2D+ from Vectric. Very good, very cheap.
Having come from Inventor, I use the free version of Fusion 360, and
find the interface suits me (most of the time). I agree that any CAD
package requires lots of learning
I concur with the Vectric recommendation. I use their VCarve and it also
handles thread milling, chamfers a little 3D and rotary work. I've rewritten
their post and now get proper peck drilling, T/C tapping and other goodies.
-Original Message-
From: Robin Szemeti via Emc-users
Sent:
I use Fusion 360 paid subscription that I got several years ago at an
introductory rate that they said would never go up. So far so good. The
only other that I have used is pro engineer / Creo. I think Fusion 360 is
good for the cost and easier to use. I like that the post processor can be
Definitely the best way to describe it
Phil T.
The Feral Engineer
Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer
Help support my channel efforts and coffee addiction:
www.patreon.com/theferalengineer
Order one of the coolest label
FreeCAD barely does CAD either ... best avoided. If you have used
SolidWorks, trying FreeCAD is like slamming your gingers repeatedly in the
desk drawer. Last time I tried it, if you removed a feature from the stack,
the remaining features re-numbered themselves, but didn't renumber the way
Freecad's interface isn't even similar to freecad's interface. There's no
rhyme or reason as to why you need to pick an edge before you can create a
feature and create a feature without picking an edge first. I've spent the
time to learn some of the nuances of freecad, but it's still not as
also dxf2gcode. (have not played with it in a long time..)
https://sourceforge.net/projects/dxf2gcode/
I have been meaning to try out freecads cam package but have not had time.
sam
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 12:45 PM Sam Sokolik wrote:
> ace converter? (I still use it a lot..)
>
> sam
>
> On
ace converter? (I still use it a lot..)
sam
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 12:39 PM Chris Albertson
wrote:
> Solidworks, FreeCAD, Fusion360 all are pretty much the same in terms of the
> user interface. If doing serious work, just buy the paid version of
> Fusion360 and sign up for real classes,
Solidworks, FreeCAD, Fusion360 all are pretty much the same in terms of the
user interface. If doing serious work, just buy the paid version of
Fusion360 and sign up for real classes, Actually do the exercises. It is
normal for it to take weeks or months of daily use before you get good at
it.
Only experience I have with alibre was when they were the new kid on the
block, trying to compete with solidworks and their interface was almost as
painful as freecad is now
Phil T.
The Feral Engineer
Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
That FreeCAD subject has once again prompted me to ask how people are using
their CAD/CAM to generate G-Code.
For the first time in about 10 years (or maybe more now) I've refused to update
my support for MecSoft Visual CAD/CAM because their response to my question was
_probably_never_.
> > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 7:39 AM Nicklas SB Karlsson
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Have registered to Freecad mailing lists and posted on at least
> > > > > one
> > > > > of
> > > > > them but they seems dead. Anybody else activing in Freecad?
> > >
> >
> > Yes mailing-lists
fre 2022-10-21 klockan 09:20 +0200 skrev Jérémie Tarot:
> Le jeu. 20 oct. 2022 à 20:05, Nicklas SB Karlsson a
> écrit :
>
> > tor 2022-10-20 klockan 10:31 -0700 skrev Chris Albertson:
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 7:39 AM Nicklas SB Karlsson
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Have registered
Le jeu. 20 oct. 2022 à 20:05, Nicklas SB Karlsson a écrit :
> tor 2022-10-20 klockan 10:31 -0700 skrev Chris Albertson:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 7:39 AM Nicklas SB Karlsson
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Have registered to Freecad mailing lists and posted on at least one
> > > of
> > > them but
Le jeu. 20 oct. 2022 à 22:52, a écrit :
> Spot drills are also available in carbide which is much stiffer than a HSS
> spot drill.
> For best accuracy, the tip angle of the spot drill should be greater than
> the angle of your drill. That is, for a 118-degree drill a spot drill of
> 120 degrees
24 matches
Mail list logo
