On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 10:16 AM Dr. Nikolaus Klepp
wrote:
> Anno domini 2021 Tue, 29 Jun 09:16:19 -0400
> Gene Heskett scripsit:
> >
> > > How about we just adopt the Golden Rule - do unto others as you would
> > > have them do unto you. That seems to have worked well for many
> > > thousands
Anno domini 2021 Tue, 29 Jun 15:25:51 +0100
andy pugh scripsit:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 15:18, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
>
> > +1 CoC guarantees nontechnical tentacles grab hold on technical projects.
> > Nobody needs those "management" types.
>
> I don't see any real risk of that happening
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:52 AM Ed wrote:
> On 6/29/21 7:55 AM, ken.stra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Perhaps just say "NO!" to such silliness? I have been on this mailing
> list for years and don't recall any instances of bad behaviour. I only very
> occasionally know enough about a topic to
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 15:18, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> +1 CoC guarantees nontechnical tentacles grab hold on technical projects.
> Nobody needs those "management" types.
I don't see any real risk of that happening to LinuxCNC. Apart from
anything else I doubt that anyone non-technical has
this;
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Yaniv who hides behind being trans
> to be a social pest. And in effect making life hard for those that are
> truly suffering.
>
> On 29/6/21 10:10 pm, Les Newell wrote:
> > I find it mildly ironic that the introduction of a code of
Anno domini 2021 Tue, 29 Jun 09:16:19 -0400
Gene Heskett scripsit:
>
> > How about we just adopt the Golden Rule - do unto others as you would
> > have them do unto you. That seems to have worked well for many
> > thousands of years. Leave the sexual preference bullcrap somewhere
> > else
Yeah, but the problem with that is, that when you "leave it alone" or
ignore it, contrary to "old fashioned belief", the woke and self
proclaimed morally/ethically superior won't leave you alone.
Look at the Centos list/project, they have now have meetings "the
group/meeting of smart
Who was the 2nd person I attacked ?
You attacked Jessica Yaniv and Coraline Ada Ehmke. The list is not the
place for this kind of politics. I won't make any further posts on this
subject but you are welcome to take it off-list if you really want to.
Les
From my view as a 'older' person: the CoC simply weaponizes those who
want to be nasty.
I visit another forum where about half the members are polite and the
other half apparently didn't get much parenting . profane,
aggressive, nasty, lacking basic spelling and language skills, etc.
On 6/29/21 7:55 AM, ken.stra...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps just say "NO!" to such silliness? I have been on this mailing list for
years and don't recall any instances of bad behaviour. I only very occasionally know
enough about a topic to contribute but I've been delighted with the help received
Les,
Who was the 2nd person I attacked ?
The Yaniv person and their antics have been widely and truthfully in the media.
The “shave my b” thing was dealt by the Canadian courts.
The reason for the “trans thing” is the driving force behind the CofC is trans
and has spoken of it themselves. If
On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 08:57 -0400, Mark Wendt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 8:46 AM Valerio Bellizzomi <
> vale...@selnet.org>
> wrote:
>
> > In my organization, which also involes machining, it is a question
> > of
> > transparency of project management, statement of compliance with
> >
On Tuesday 29 June 2021 07:47:58 Mark Wendt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 6:51 AM Valerio Bellizzomi
>
>
> wrote:
> > I think this CoC leaves a lot to be desired. But can I suggest a
> > very good one, one which I adopted in my own organization?
> >
> > https://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/
> >
What on earth does the subject of being trans have to do with this list?
You also personally attacked two people so far in this thread. That goes
against the CoC.
Les
On 29/06/2021 14:00, Robert Murphy wrote:
Do you care to point out this..oh hang on I did call someone not
involved in
those that are
truly suffering.
On 29/6/21 10:10 pm, Les Newell wrote:
I find it mildly ironic that the introduction of a code of conduct
triggered one of the few posts I've seen on this list that breaks the
code of conduct...
_______
Emc-users ma
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 8:46 AM Valerio Bellizzomi
wrote:
>
> In my organization, which also involes machining, it is a question of
> transparency of project management, statement of compliance with
> management standards, and commitment to a positive work place. It is
> also a means to resolve
eep things as they are!
-Original Message-
From: fxkl47BF via Emc-users
Sent: June 29, 2021 8:14 AM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller \(EMC\)
Cc: fxkl47BF
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Code of Conduct
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, June 29th, 2021 at 3:52 AM, Robert Murphy
wrote:
> I h
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 8:13 AM Les Newell
wrote:
> I find it mildly ironic that the introduction of a code of conduct
> triggered one of the few posts I've seen on this list that breaks the
> code of conduct...
>
What makes you think any of the posts so far broke the code of conduct? We
get
On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 07:47 -0400, Mark Wendt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 6:51 AM Valerio Bellizzomi <
> vale...@selnet.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I think this CoC leaves a lot to be desired. But can I suggest a
> > very
> > good one, one which I adopted in my own organization?
> >
> >
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, June 29th, 2021 at 3:52 AM, Robert Murphy
wrote:
> I have a feeling that there is a boiler plate/template for the Code of
> Conduct.
> Rumours abound relating to projects being forced to have one.
have one or be labeled non-conformist and be
I find it mildly ironic that the introduction of a code of conduct
triggered one of the few posts I've seen on this list that breaks the
code of conduct...
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 6:51 AM Valerio Bellizzomi
wrote:
>
> I think this CoC leaves a lot to be desired. But can I suggest a very
> good one, one which I adopted in my own organization?
>
> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/
>
>
> Regards.
>
My only question is why in the heck is this even
On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 09:10 +0100, andy pugh wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 04:14, John Dammeyer
> wrote:
> > At the risk of being banned I'd suggest that this one point is a
> > bit extreme:
> >
> > "Excessive or unwelcome helping; answering outside the scope of the
> > question asked"
>
> It
hahaha well said
But aren't all the cool electronics kids well into grbl & arduino ?
On 29/6/21 7:28 pm, Bari wrote:
On 6/29/21 3:52 AM, Robert Murphy wrote:
what are biggest hurdles for running a 3D printer with Linuxcnc.
People telling you that you should be using a *duino and GRBL and
On 6/29/21 3:52 AM, Robert Murphy wrote:
what are biggest hurdles for running a 3D printer with Linuxcnc.
People telling you that you should be using a *duino and GRBL and doing
less with less.
___
Emc-users mailing list
I have a feeling that there is a boiler plate/template for the Code of Conduct.
Rumours abound relating to projects being forced to have one.
The great thing about forums and mailing list is you can skip those topics you
want.
3D printing seems to be what the young people jive with.
Not being
> From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 04:14, John Dammeyer wrote:
> >
> > At the risk of being banned I'd suggest that this one point is a bit
> > extreme:
> >
> > "Excessive or unwelcome helping; answering outside the scope of the
> > question asked"
>
> It
Anno domini 2021 Tue, 29 Jun 09:10:35 +0100
andy pugh scripsit:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 04:14, John Dammeyer wrote:
> >
> > At the risk of being banned I'd suggest that this one point is a bit
> > extreme:
> >
> > "Excessive or unwelcome helping; answering outside the scope of the
> >
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 04:14, John Dammeyer wrote:
>
> At the risk of being banned I'd suggest that this one point is a bit extreme:
>
> "Excessive or unwelcome helping; answering outside the scope of the question
> asked"
It does seem a little odd. I suspect it is aimed at some manner of
On Tuesday 29 June 2021 03:39:08 Robert Murphy wrote:
> Look John,
>
> Part of backlash towards the Code of Conduct in the beginning, I think
> it was 2018 that it really became public, was whether code was based
> on merit or who wrote it. Now that goes against the grain of OSS. I
> accept that
Look John,
Part of backlash towards the Code of Conduct in the beginning, I think it was
2018 that it really became public, was whether code was based on merit or who
wrote it. Now that goes against the grain of OSS.
I accept that my views can be a “bit out there”, but I wish no harm to anyone
I agree with you John, and what some others said on here, about this
coc thing ...
I have been lurking on here for a good long while, and asked some
questions lately... but I think I can say that I have never really
seen anything mean/inappropriate posted here (although I don't
> From: Robert Murphy [mailto:robert.mur...@gmx.com]
> I have a feeling this post maybe violating the Code of Conduct.
Your post violates the spirit of what LinuxCNC and open source forims is all
about and IMHO there is no place for that on this forum.
I want to learn from experienced
ngs better
Ron
John Dammeyer
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Epler [mailto:jep...@unpythonic.net]
Sent: June-28-21 6:26 PM
To: Jeff Epler
Subject: [Emc-users] Code of Conduct
The LinuxCNC community including this mailing list now has a written
code of conduct. Unless it's your idea of fun
Ron
John Dammeyer
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Epler [mailto:jep...@unpythonic.net]
Sent: June-28-21 6:26 PM
To: Jeff Epler
Subject: [Emc-users] Code of Conduct
The LinuxCNC community including this mailing list now has a written
code of conduct. Unless it's your idea of fun to harass oth
helps me understand things better
Ron
John Dammeyer
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Epler [mailto:jep...@unpythonic.net]
Sent: June-28-21 6:26 PM
To: Jeff Epler
Subject: [Emc-users] Code of Conduct
The LinuxCNC community including this mailing list now has a written
code of conduct. Unl
etter
Ron
John Dammeyer
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Epler [mailto:jep...@unpythonic.net]
Sent: June-28-21 6:26 PM
To: Jeff Epler
Subject: [Emc-users] Code of Conduct
The LinuxCNC community including this mailing list now has a written
code of conduct. Unless it's your idea of fun to
26 PM
To: Jeff Epler
Subject: [Emc-users] Code of Conduct
The LinuxCNC community including this mailing list now has a written
code of conduct. Unless it's your idea of fun to harass other people,
this is a big non-event for you.
You can read the code of conduct here:
https://www.linuxcnc.org/CO
6:26 PM
> To: Jeff Epler
> Subject: [Emc-users] Code of Conduct
>
> The LinuxCNC community including this mailing list now has a written
> code of conduct. Unless it's your idea of fun to harass other people,
> this is a big non-event for you.
>
> You can read the code
The LinuxCNC community including this mailing list now has a written
code of conduct. Unless it's your idea of fun to harass other people,
this is a big non-event for you.
You can read the code of conduct here:
https://www.linuxcnc.org/CODE_OF_CONDUCT/
Jeff
201 - 240 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
