Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion

2016-10-19 Thread John Thornton
Thanks Todd, docs are fixed. JT On 10/19/2016 02:17 PM, Todd Zuercher wrote: > G61 Exact path mode, movement exactly as programed. Moves will slow or stop > as needed to reach every programed point. If two sequential moves are > exactly co-linear movement will not stop. > G61.1 Exact stop mod

Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion

2016-10-19 Thread Todd Zuercher
ramed segment. - Original Message - From: "John Thornton" To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 2:36:33 PM Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion How should the manual for 2.7 read? I'll fix it... JT On 10/18/2016 12:29 PM,

Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion

2016-10-19 Thread John Thornton
ut G61.1 does. Maybe the docs should be adjusted to reflect that. >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "John Thornton" >>> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" >> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:56:56 AM >>> Subject: Re:

Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion

2016-10-18 Thread Belli Button
Hey Rob! Just wanted to say thanks... -Original Message- From: Robert Ellenberg [mailto:rwe...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 October 2016 19:29 To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion The discrepancy is likely because the behavior changed in 2.7. In

Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion

2016-10-18 Thread Robert Ellenberg
s, a quick test seems to show that for co-linear points G61 doesn't > stop but G61.1 does. Maybe the docs should be adjusted to reflect that. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "John Thornton" > > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"

Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion

2016-10-18 Thread Nicklas Karlsson
stop > but G61.1 does. Maybe the docs should be adjusted to reflect that. > > - Original Message - > From: "John Thornton" > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:56:56 AM > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Cycle tim

Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion

2016-10-18 Thread Todd Zuercher
have a G61.1 mode? Is it in anyway different > from plain G61? > > - Original Message - > From: "John Thornton" > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 9:21:29 AM > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time dis

Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion (exact endpoint)

2016-10-18 Thread Nicklas Karlsson
> Looks like G61.1 stops at every end point and G61 only visits each end > point but may stop if needed. Could also be incorrect descriptions of > them... The problem is if path should be followed exactly and end point visited exactly it need to slow down to a stop. The reason is otherwise infi

Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion

2016-10-18 Thread John Thornton
in G61? > > - Original Message - > From: "John Thornton" > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 9:21:29 AM > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion > > That depends on you, if you do nothing you g

Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion

2016-10-18 Thread Todd Zuercher
Stupid question, why do we even have a G61.1 mode? Is it in anyway different from plain G61? - Original Message - From: "John Thornton" To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 9:21:29 AM Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discuss

Re: [Emc-users] Cycle time discussion

2016-10-18 Thread John Thornton
That depends on you, if you do nothing you get G64 http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.7/html/gcode/g-code.html#gcode:g64 If you set G64 P you get something else http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.7/html/gcode/g-code.html#gcode:g64 If you set G61 or G61.1 you get something different http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.7/