d these since they are still in early phases
of development. However, I have now added a section titled "New
Certificate Types and Compression Algorithms". Hope this is sufficient.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mohit Sethi M
> Sent: Saturday,
ogress.
Ciao
Hannes
-Original Message-
From: Mohit Sethi M
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2020 10:49 AM
To: Hannes Tschofenig ; Michael Richardson
; emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] My review ... was RE: I-D Action:
draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert-02.txt
Hi Hannes,
I have submitted a new version
Hi Hannes,
I have submitted a new version of the draft which I believe addresses
your concerns. Here is a diff for your convenience:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert-03
While Alan and Jouni have already provided excellent answers to most of
your comments, in-line
Thanks, Jouni. That's a good clarification.
-Original Message-
From: Jouni Malinen
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2020 9:26 AM
To: Alan DeKok
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig ; emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] My review ... was RE: I-D Action:
draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert-02.txt
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:08:06AM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2020, at 4:00 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
> wrote:
> >> For example, many EAP authenticator (access point)
> >> implementations will drop an EAP session if it has not finished after
> >> 40 - 50 round-trips.
> >
> > Is there a
On Mar 25, 2020, at 3:30 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your comments. I guess you understand that I am always a bit
> nervous when the results of non-public conversations dictate the problem
> space. I have seen it often enough that people have made their measurements
>
My review ... was RE: I-D Action:
draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert-02.txt
On Mar 24, 2020, at 4:00 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
wrote:
> Having seen this statement from Michael I have reviewed the document. Two
> generic observations about the draft:
>
> 1) Many statements are made about deploym
On Mar 24, 2020, at 4:00 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
wrote:
> Having seen this statement from Michael I have reviewed the document. Two
> generic observations about the draft:
>
> 1) Many statements are made about deployments and no references are provided.
> To improve quality of the write-up I
> On 24 Mar 2020, at 10:30, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>
> Hi Eliot,
>
> I consider the enterprise and the university case as a roaming model. From an
> EAP method point of view there is IMHO little difference between the roaming
> and the non-roaming case: the EAP exchange always runs
rdson mailto:mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>>;
emu@ietf.org<mailto:emu@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Emu] My review ... was RE: I-D Action:
draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert-02.txt
Good morning Hannes
Also,
from deployment experience, EAP peers typically have longer
certificate chains than servers.
I would l
> certificates/certificate chains occur would shine light on this aspect.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> From: Eliot Lear
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 10:02 AM
> To: Hannes Tschofenig
> Cc: Michael Richardson ; emu@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Emu] My review ... was
: Michael Richardson ; emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] My review ... was RE: I-D Action:
draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert-02.txt
Good morning Hannes
Also,
from deployment experience, EAP peers typically have longer
certificate chains than servers.
I would like a reference to be included here
Good morning Hannes
>
>
>> Also,
>> from deployment experience, EAP peers typically have longer
>> certificate chains than servers.
>
> I would like a reference to be included here. Theoretically, it makes no
> sense to
> have a certificate chain for an EAP peer to have a longer certificate
13 matches
Mail list logo
