On 04/04/13 04:40, Cedric BAIL - Enlightenment Git wrote:
> cedric pushed a commit to branch master.
>
> commit 54b9b19b666b8fe3b2218424172253b82a0d1e2f
> Author: Cedric BAIL
> Date: Thu Apr 4 12:36:03 2013 +0900
>
> evas: let's not force an allocation and write for nothing.
> ---
> src/l
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:26:42 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 28/03/13 10:49, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:56:40 + Michael Blumenkrantz
> > said:
> >
> > thats cool. i just had to be grumpy about not having a bug report that told
> > me what to look at insta
On 04/04/2013 12:09 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Simon writes:
>
>> Simple fix for the main, that i modified from a version someone at
>> SUSE did for something similar, basicly they added another param to
>> some functions to return a error code. Our functions already had a
>> error code bu
On 28/03/13 10:49, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:56:40 + Michael Blumenkrantz
> said:
>
> thats cool. i just had to be grumpy about not having a bug report that told me
> what to look at instantly. i have found another bug. single letter words dont
> find wor
2013/4/3 David Seikel
> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:55:43 +0100 Daniel Willmann
> wrote:
>
> > On 03/04/13 12:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:27 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> > > said:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >> Not putting it as a top priority does not mean I'm not g
This is relevant to graphical Java applications which require it.
---
AUTHORS | 3 +++
src/ewins.c | 2 +-
src/focus.c | 65 -
src/focus.h | 1 +
src/icccm.c | 11 +++
5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
dif
thanks a lot
On Wednesday 03 April 2013 10:22, Daniel Willmann wrote :
> On 02/04/13 22:24, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose a tactical repo move from
> > devs/jeyzu/ffi-efl.git to bindings/ruby/ffi-efl.git
> > under the description: Ruby bindings for the EFL,
> > to match the
* Michael Blumenkrantz [2013-04-03 07:36:14
+0100]:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Gustavo Lima Chaves
> wrote:
>
> > * Carsten Haitzler [2013-04-03 11:36:23 +0900]:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:28:34 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin
> > said:
> > >
> > > how is this meant to be different to:
>
me (if you can read frog :) ) :
http://steven.le-roux.info/comment-la-chine-a-detourner-15-du-trafic-int
Or :
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=249#
I reversed some numbers :)
It was : 15% of Internet BGP routes, during 18%.
The thing is... if in those 15% you
On 2013-04-03 15:05, Steven Le Roux wrote:
> Or we could use TLS/SNI on the RP to match the good vhost with one IP.
Even more incompatibility on client side.
--
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
R
On 2013-04-03 16:23, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:02:28 +0200 Steven Le Roux
> wrote:
>
>> #define work ?
>>
>> Even if you get a warning and a striked lock in your url bar, it's
>> working...
>>
>> SSL certs in browser is just a trust network... and you can just buy
>> this trus
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:55:43 +0100 Daniel Willmann
wrote:
> On 03/04/13 12:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:27 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> > said:
>
> [...]
>
> >> Not putting it as a top priority does not mean I'm not going to
> >> fix it. I don't get why you
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:02:28 +0200 Steven Le Roux
wrote:
> #define work ?
>
> Even if you get a warning and a striked lock in your url bar, it's
> working...
>
> SSL certs in browser is just a trust network... and you can just buy
> this trust with costly webtrust audit...
>
> In case you misse
Simon writes:
> Simple fix for the main, that i modified from a version someone at
> SUSE did for something similar, basicly they added another param to
> some functions to return a error code. Our functions already had a
> error code but i thought it would be bad form to change the existing
> fu
Hi all,
Simple fix for the main, that i modified from a version someone at SUSE
did for something similar, basicly they added another param to some
functions to return a error code. Our functions already had a error code
but i thought it would be bad form to change the existing function
behav
#define work ?
Even if you get a warning and a striked lock in your url bar, it's
working...
SSL certs in browser is just a trust network... and you can just buy this
trust with costly webtrust audit...
In case you missed it, China had eaten 18% of the internet trafic during
15minutes... not an
On 03/04/13 14:03, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:59:07 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 03/04/13 13:52, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:49:25 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>>> said:
>>>
On 03/04/13 12:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterma
On 03/04/13 13:57, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 14h52, « Tom Hacohen » a écrit :
>> On 03/04/13 13:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:23:38 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin
>>> said:
>>>
> but the don't want to. thats the problem. not magicall
Or we could use TLS/SNI on the RP to match the good vhost with one IP.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 14h52, « Tom Hacohen » a écrit :
> > On 03/04/13 13:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:23:38 +0200 Be
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:59:07 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 03/04/13 13:52, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:49:25 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> > said:
> >
> >> On 03/04/13 12:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:27 +0100 Tom Hacohen
On 03/04/13 13:52, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:49:25 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 03/04/13 12:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:27 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>>> said:
>>>
On 28/03/13 13:25, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>
Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 14h52, « Tom Hacohen » a écrit :
> On 03/04/13 13:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:23:38 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin
> > said:
> >
> >>> but the don't want to. thats the problem. not magically and instantly
> >>> working perfectly out of
On 03/04/13 12:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:27 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> said:
[...]
>> Not putting it as a top priority does not mean I'm not going to fix it.
>> I don't get why you insist on misrepresenting the truth over and over
> again.
>
> ok everyone
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:49:25 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 03/04/13 12:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:27 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> > said:
> >
> >> On 28/03/13 13:25, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:49:31 +0900
> >>> Carsten Haitzler (
On 03/04/13 13:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:23:38 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
>
>>> but the don't want to. thats the problem. not magically and instantly
>>> working perfectly out of the box in their browser == fail in their eyes.
>>
>> Too lazy guys. And th
On 03/04/13 12:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:27 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 28/03/13 13:25, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:49:31 +0900
>>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:56:40 + Mich
Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 14h42, « Carsten Haitzler » a écrit :
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:23:38 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
>
> > > but the don't want to. thats the problem. not magically and instantly
> > > working perfectly out of the box in their browser == fail in their eyes.
> >
> > Too la
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:23:38 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
> > but the don't want to. thats the problem. not magically and instantly
> > working perfectly out of the box in their browser == fail in their eyes.
>
> Too lazy guys. And this not what I saw on other foss projets. Developers are
> not e
> but the don't want to. thats the problem. not magically and instantly working
> perfectly out of the box in their browser == fail in their eyes.
Too lazy guys. And this not what I saw on other foss projets. Developers are not
end users, not the same investment the both of them. Often, FOSS
devel
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:44:37 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
> Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 12h25, « Carsten Haitzler » a écrit :
> > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:16 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin
> > said:
> >
> > > On 2013-04-03 04:33, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:57:34 +0200 Steven
Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 12h25, « Carsten Haitzler » a écrit :
> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:16 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
>
> > On 2013-04-03 04:33, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:57:34 +0200 Steven Le Roux
> > > said:
> > >
> > >> We could go with CACert ... not a big
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:27 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 28/03/13 13:25, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:49:31 +0900
> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:56:40 + Michael Blumenkrantz
> >> said:
> >>
> >> thats cool. i just had t
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:02:36 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
> Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 04h36, « Carsten Haitzler » a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:28:34 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin
> > said:
> >
> > how is this meant to be different to:
> >
> > https://phab.enlightenment.org/feed/
>
> Not so d
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:16 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
> On 2013-04-03 04:33, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:57:34 +0200 Steven Le Roux
> > said:
> >
> >> We could go with CACert ... not a big deal if a last century browser
> >> alerts
> >> with an unknown CA... at least
On 28/03/13 13:25, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:49:31 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:56:40 + Michael Blumenkrantz
>> said:
>>
>> thats cool. i just had to be grumpy about not having a bug report that told
>> me
>> what to l
On 02/04/13 11:56, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> On 01/04/13 10:33, Igor Murzov wrote:
>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:09:19 -0300
>> Rafael Antognolli wrote:
>>
>>> Hey guys, could you please do this for me?
>>
>> And ephoto, please ^_^
>
> This might take me until tomorrow.
Take a look here:
http://git.e
On 02/04/13 22:24, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> I would like to propose a tactical repo move from
> devs/jeyzu/ffi-efl.git to bindings/ruby/ffi-efl.git
> under the description: Ruby bindings for the EFL,
> to match the python binding one.
Done.
Regards,
Daniel
-
On 2013-04-03 04:33, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:57:34 +0200 Steven Le Roux
> said:
>
>> We could go with CACert ... not a big deal if a last century browser
>> alerts
>> with an unknown CA... at least chrome has it built-in already.
>
> we are with cacert. problem is sever
Le mercredi 03 avril 2013 à 04h36, « Carsten Haitzler » a écrit :
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:28:34 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
>
> how is this meant to be different to:
>
> https://phab.enlightenment.org/feed/
Not so different, true, one more concise. Can live with the feed page with no
problem !
39 matches
Mail list logo
