[E-devel] [eina] about amalgamation

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey, CFLAGS: -O3 LDFLAGS: -Wl,-s with amalgamation, the size of the .so is 141316 without, it is 142216 is it normal ? Vincent -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Sim

Re: [E-devel] [patch] esmart: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball

2009-09-09 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote : > Is the following appropriate? > > - > > Subject: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball > > autogen.sh is used by the debian packaging so it seems > appropriate to include

Re: [E-devel] [eina] about amalgamation

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Vincent Torri wrote: > > Hey, > > CFLAGS: -O3 > LDFLAGS: -Wl,-s > > with amalgamation, the size of the .so is 141316 > without, it is 142216 > > is it normal ? I mean, such a small difference in size Vincent -

Re: [E-devel] [patch] esmart: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote : >> Is the following appropriate? >> >> - >> >> Subject: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball >> >> autogen.sh is used by the deb

Re: [E-devel] RFC eina inlist, list

2009-09-09 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:52:39PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >- ultra-dirty hack to remove extra pointer. The hack bases on the > fact that we just use ->last from the first node, that always have the > ->prev == NULL. So we could have the first ->prev == ->last, but how > to know

Re: [E-devel] [eina] about amalgamation

2009-09-09 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Vincent Torri wrote: > >> >> Hey, >> >> CFLAGS: -O3 >> LDFLAGS: -Wl,-s >> >> with amalgamation, the size of the .so is 141316 >> without, it is 142216 >> >> is it normal ? > > I mean, such a small difference in size i'

Re: [E-devel] [eina] about amalgamation

2009-09-09 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Peter Wehrfritz wrote: > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb: >> >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> >>> Hey, CFLAGS: -O3 LDFLAGS: -Wl,-s with amalgamation,

Re: [E-devel] [eina] about amalgamation

2009-09-09 Thread Peter Wehrfritz
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > >> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Vincent Torri wrote: >> >> >>> Hey, >>> >>> CFLAGS: -O3 >>> LDFLAGS: -Wl,-s >>> >>> with amalgamation, the size of the .so is 141316 >>> without, it is 142216 >>> >>> is it nor

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: sachiel IN trunk/eina/src: include tests

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Enlightenment SVN wrote: Modified: trunk/eina/src/include/eina_inlist.h === --- trunk/eina/src/include/eina_inlist.h2009-09-09 10:44:25 UTC (rev 42365) +++ trunk/eina/src/include/eina_inlist.h2

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: sachiel IN trunk/eina/src: include tests

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Ivan Briano wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Enlightenment SVN wrote: Modified: trunk/eina/src/include/eina_inlist.h === --- trunk/eina/src/include/eina_inli

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: sachiel IN trunk/eina/src: include tests

2009-09-09 Thread Ivan Briano
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Enlightenment SVN wrote: >> >> Modified: trunk/eina/src/include/eina_inlist.h >> === >> --- trunk/eina/src/include/eina_inlist.h        2009-09-09 10:44:25

Re: [E-devel] [patch] esmart: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball

2009-09-09 Thread Simon Horman
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:30:24AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote : > > Is the following appropriate? > > > > - > > > > Subject: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball > > > >

Re: [E-devel] [patch] esmart: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball

2009-09-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:50:04 +1000 Simon Horman said: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:30:24AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote : > > > Is the following appropriate? > > > > > > --

Re: [E-devel] RFC eina inlist, list

2009-09-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 20:52:39 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: you've already put my word in on this. i go the accounting way. 1. it is consistent with eina_list. 2. can be extended beyond last and include count and many other things. 3. doesn't change inlist struct size to be bigger (tho we do

Re: [E-devel] [patch] esmart: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball

2009-09-09 Thread Simon Horman
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:46:54AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:50:04 +1000 Simon Horman said: > > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:30:24AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > > > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote : > > > > Is the following appropriate? > > > >

Re: [E-devel] enlightenment_remote segfaults

2009-09-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 P Purkayastha said: you won't like this but e_remote and e's ipc are scheduled for death (removal). 1. we have a dbu api already for e, 2. this includes the core set of ops needed, 3. it's expandable by modules. the maintenance of ipc_handlers is painful. i w

Re: [E-devel] [patch] esmart: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball

2009-09-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:54:01 +1000 Simon Horman said: > > actually. alibin is wrong (sorry!) autogen's do get packaged. look at > > existing efl. we put it in so if u get a tarball u CAN easily modify the > > configure.ac, Makefile.am's etc. and re-generate the autofoo. the script > > will be the

Re: [E-devel] RFC eina inlist, list

2009-09-09 Thread Simon Horman
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:53:17AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 20:52:39 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > said: > > you've already put my word in on this. i go the accounting way. 1. it is > consistent with eina_list. 2. can be extended beyond last and include count > and

Re: [E-devel] RFC eina inlist, list

2009-09-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:19:53 +1000 Simon Horman said: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:53:17AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 20:52:39 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > said: > > > > you've already put my word in on this. i go the accounting way. 1. it is > > consistent with

Re: [E-devel] enlightenment_remote segfaults

2009-09-09 Thread P Purkayastha
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 21:15:25 Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 P Purkayastha said: > > you won't like this but e_remote and e's ipc are scheduled for death > (removal). 1. we have a dbu api already for e, 2. this includes the core > set of ops needed, 3.

Re: [E-devel] enlightenment_remote segfaults

2009-09-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:04:35 -0400 P Purkayastha said: > On Wednesday 09 September 2009 21:15:25 Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 P Purkayastha said: > > > > you won't like this but e_remote and e's ipc are scheduled for death > > (removal). 1. we have a dbu api

Re: [E-devel] enlightenment_remote segfaults

2009-09-09 Thread P Purkayastha
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 22:17:48 you wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:04:35 -0400 P Purkayastha said: > > On Wednesday 09 September 2009 21:15:25 Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 P Purkayastha > > > said: > > > > > > you won't like this but e_remote and e's

Re: [E-devel] RFC eina inlist, list

2009-09-09 Thread David Seikel
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:53:17 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > i've sen this game played before (using high order bits) and then it > com crashing down on peoples heads when suddenly those used bits > become relevant. Microsoft BASIC for the Amiga I'll bet. lol signature.asc Des

Re: [E-devel] RFC eina inlist, list

2009-09-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:02:19 +1000 David Seikel said: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:53:17 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > wrote: > > > i've sen this game played before (using high order bits) and then it > > com crashing down on peoples heads when suddenly those used bits > > become relevan

Re: [E-devel] [patch] esmart: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:50:04 +1000 Simon Horman said: > >> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:30:24AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote: >>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote : Is the following appropriate? --

[E-devel] resolve eet build failure

2009-09-09 Thread Simon Horman
As reported in track ticket 377 (amongst other things), eet seems to fail to build (on Debian). # svn checkout FOO/eet # cd eet # ./autogen.sh # make [snip] libtool: link: gcc -std=gnu99 -Wall -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -Wl,--as-needed -o .libs/eet eet-eet_main.o ../../src/lib/.libs/libeet.s