Toma wrote:
On 30/07/2008, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vincent wrote:
Quoting Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One idea I discussed with Vincent today is that our lack of releases
has caused many users to lose interest and stop taking notice of the
I wrote:
...
As to the above mentioned steps.. I disagree with some of the
arguments,
but they are also not unreasonable - so long as everyone realizes that the
state
of many things in E is still rather basic and are willing to 'break' apis on
major releases when they bring
On 31/07/2008, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
...
As to the above mentioned steps.. I disagree with some of the
arguments,
but they are also not unreasonable - so long as everyone realizes that
the state
of many things in E is still rather basic and are
Toma wrote:
On 31/07/2008, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
...
As to the above mentioned steps.. I disagree with some of the
arguments,
but they are also not unreasonable - so long as everyone realizes that
the state
of many things in E is
I wrote:
Toma wrote:
On 31/07/2008, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
...
As to the above mentioned steps.. I disagree with some of the
arguments,
but they are also not unreasonable - so long as everyone realizes
By a future version of those libs of course I meant a 'major' version
increase.
In any case, if you want to know why I don't think eg. evas is near ready
for a release: it's not just gradients or vgfx stuff, it's possibly smart
classes
and native surfaces that may need breaking
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the subject states, let me make a (relatively) short summary of some
proposed changes and additions to the evas gfx api -- and I'll deal with only
gradients and a possible vgfx-objs api, leaving transforms (mostly)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the subject states, let me make a (relatively) short summary of some
proposed changes and additions to the evas gfx api -- and I'll
Jorge wrote:
Some time ago i had another idea that i've been implementing, some of
you already know enesim and ekeko, some other dont, let me explain why
i think adding this to evas is not good imho.
One of the main reasons of not releasing software is that it evolves
too fast or it
that's a bit what i propose when i said to release as 0.10. We keep the
major release to 0 and are free to break anything for the major 1 version
In addition, packagers will be happier with a 0.10 release rather than
with a snapshot, which means that we can spread the efl technologies in a
Toma escreveu:
Thats a funny one, because a lot of people say Oh, E17 isnt as good
as Gnome... or KDE when its not completely a desktop environmant like
those 2. It has a lot of the mechanics of a full DE and being so
modular, could fill the things needed to become a full DE from that
point.
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2008-07-31 07:10:58 -0700
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
enna http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/enna.log
epdf http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/epdf.log
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 05:27:35PM -0300, imx31cpu . wrote:
I am new to the enlightment world and I will soon (tomorrow) start
trying to port it to an embedded system (Freescale i.MX31 PDK -
http://www.freescale.com/imx31pdk).
Since I am not an experient developer on the linux
On Thu, 31 July 2008 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anything, it might be an idea to ask people, what 'needs' to be
done? I see a few people on IRC and on forums saying, E17 is good,
but its just not finished/has bits missing. Some lusers go as far to
say Err E17 is buggy and not stable! Waa
On 31-Jul-08, at 3:48 PM, Bruno wrote:
On Thu, 31 July 2008 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anything, it might be an idea to ask people, what 'needs' to be
done? I see a few people on IRC and on forums saying, E17 is good,
but its just not finished/has bits missing. Some lusers go as far to
On Thu, 31 July 2008 dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31-Jul-08, at 3:48 PM, Bruno wrote:
On Thu, 31 July 2008 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anything, it might be an idea to ask people, what 'needs' to be
done? I see a few people on IRC and on forums saying, E17 is good,
but
On 31-Jul-08, at 4:14 PM, Bruno wrote:
On Thu, 31 July 2008 dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31-Jul-08, at 3:48 PM, Bruno wrote:
On Thu, 31 July 2008 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anything, it might be an idea to ask people, what 'needs' to be
done? I see a few people on IRC and
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:24 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends on if the projects are using it. You can see features we're
working for Ewl and the discussions we've had about how to implement
them. You can also search for resolved and closed bugs to see what's
implemented
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:23:53 +0200 Robert Schwebel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 05:27:35PM -0300, imx31cpu . wrote:
I am new to the enlightment world and I will soon (tomorrow) start
trying to port it to an embedded system (Freescale i.MX31 PDK -
Someone needs to blog all the interesting changes to cvs then submit
that to places like reddit, digg and slashdot. That way people see all
this interesting stuff going on and want to join in.
Toma
On 7/29/08, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the most recent license flamewar was
That would be useful. This is a great task for someone that doesn't
feel they are a developer, but can understand the CVS logs that come
through.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone needs to blog all the interesting changes to cvs then submit
that to places
|Sorry for my bad english, fix me|
I think that the e community need:
1. A website well structured. Today it is unusable!!!
It should be simple! The first page has to show the power of e (with fresh
screenshots, news). New graphic and new layout (the design is good but it
isn't fit the usability
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Downknew Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Sorry for my bad english, fix me|
I think that the e community need:
1. A website well structured. Today it is unusable!!!
It should be simple! The first page has to show the power of e (with fresh
screenshots, news).
On 01/08/2008, Downknew Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Sorry for my bad english, fix me|
I think that the e community need:
1. A website well structured. Today it is unusable!!!
It should be simple! The first page has to show the power of e (with fresh
screenshots, news). New graphic and new
24 matches
Mail list logo
