delurk/
On Aug 2, 2008, at 12:11 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:52 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:03:33 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Gustavo wrote:
Since Edje is
On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:53 PM, dan sinclair wrote:
On 2-Aug-08, at 1:40 AM, Nick Hughart wrote:
Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
I'd say you're so eager to release something you're not thinking
about
the impression it gives. Changing things in a pre-1.0 is fine
On Aug 2, 2008, at 6:55 PM, dan sinclair wrote:
On 2-Aug-08, at 9:41 PM, Blake Barnett wrote:
On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:53 PM, dan sinclair wrote:
It all comes down to when you're doing the 2.0 release. If you do a
2.0 release in a few months it looks like we just rushed a 1.0 out
the
door
On Mar 19, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Falko Schmidt wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've been responsible for the CVS commits regarding Debian packaging
since about two years. The PkgE Debian Team
(http://wiki.debian.org/PkgE) is about to upload or already uploading
some EFL packages to Debian experimental.
On Feb 15, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
snip
Yeah, unfortunately my participation at SCALE fell through. I'm not
sure if raster made it, but it would be good to hear a trip report if
he did. :-)
On Dec 7, 2006, at 9:24 PM, David Seikel wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:51:48 -0600 Brian Mattern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:53:53AM -0600, Brian Mattern wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 05:52:40PM +1000, David Seikel wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:33:06 -0600 Brian
On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Виктор Кожухаров wrote:
В ср, 2006-11-08 в 23:08 +0100, Morten Nilsen написа:
Arnaldo de Moraes Pereira wrote:
On 11/8/06, DaveMDS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: Some idea for the application name? my first choice is
'ertist' but
need suggestion.
Edesigner ?
On Oct 23, 2006, at 4:46 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:43:02 -0700 Blake Barnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Oct 23, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:59:36 +0200 Jakob Haufe [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Oct 24, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2006, at 10:13:21 (-0700),
Blake Barnett wrote:
Obviously these packages wouldn't get into Debian this way. Once
the version changes to 0.17, it won't matter anymore.
Are you sure? Epoch in RPM supercedes
On Oct 24, 2006, at 11:48 AM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2006, at 10:48:16 (-0700),
Blake Barnett wrote:
And even still, it shouldn't matter. If people are going to change
their source for the packages (especially going to the main
repository), they need to remove all
On Oct 24, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2006, at 12:09:11 (-0700),
Blake Barnett wrote:
We did it because it was a support nightmare to explain why the main
repository packages always took precedence, even though their
version was lower. It works
On Sep 25, 2006, at 10:44 AM, David Sharp wrote:
amd64 users, rejoice!
i got tired of slowing down e with -mfpmath=387 all the time, so i
finally dug in to this bug after realizing it was probably a problem
with floating point cancelation (occurs when subtracting two numbers
that are very
Personally, I don't think it's worth it. Integrating it well with
e17 is non-trivial because of deficiencies in the spec. Trayer works
fine as an alternative: http://prdownload.berlios.de/fvwm-crystal/
trayer-1.0.tar.gz
-Blake
On Sep 18, 2006, at 12:10 PM, João Vale wrote:
I assumed it
On Sep 11, 2006, at 6:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:23:34AM -0500, Alberto Castro wrote:
Eugen Minciu wrote:
There's www.enlightenment.org and www.e-develop.org and www.get-
e.org. This really seems like a far stretch to me, imho there
should be just one
On Sep 11, 2006, at 11:04 AM, Michael Jennings wrote:
snip
Thanks, but I think we'd rather not. Not many of us know or use Ruby,
and some of the most fundamental Ruby software (Rake!) is broken. I'd
rather stick with something more mature and more supported by the
developers.
snip
Huh?
On Sep 11, 2006, at 11:12 AM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Monday, 11 September 2006, at 11:04:13 (-0700),
Blake Barnett wrote:
I don't think it's even worth discussing going back to the old
CVS/HTML setup. The point is to encourage _casual_ contribution,
not to make it hard, which it seems
On Sep 11, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Monday, 11 September 2006, at 11:41:51 (-0700),
Blake Barnett wrote:
And it requires giving everyone who wants to add a simple little
news item access to everything in CVS (should normally be a
problem... but.)
So? Like write
On Sep 11, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Monday, 11 September 2006, at 23:29:11 (+0300),
Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
Prior to diving into the what to use discussion
See, I don't think that's the conversation we should be having right
now.
We're using XSM right now. Unless
On Sep 11, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
snip
one issues i see in merging them - 2 use xsm (fine) 1. uses drupal
(php cms).
edevelop's forums just can't function without dynamic www - xsm
itself can't
really scale there. so do we rewrite forum code in php to
On Sep 7, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Friday, 08 September 2006, at 00:13:17 (+0200),
Kim Woelders wrote:
Hehehe - You'll love it:
libX11-devel-1.0.3-2.fc6
libXScrnSaver-devel-1.1.0-3.1
libXTrap-devel-1.0.0-3.1
libXau-devel-1.0.1-3.1
libXaw-devel-1.0.2-8.1
On Aug 10, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:51:24 -0400 Dusik [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:23:38 -0400 Carl Bolduc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Is there a plan on supporting this kinda notifications?
Thank you for the
On Aug 11, 2006, at 12:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carsten writes:
XPM is not hard - loader is in imlbi2 - can be snarfed in.
svg - well - a bigger issue - but i think we can avoid it for
now and just display default icons in place. as long the the
icon finder routine will
On Jul 5, 2006, at 7:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
This would allow evas to remain purely within the realm
of non-premul color space and have more-or-less the same results
with the xrender engine as with the software engine.
The benefits of this would of course be that
On Jul 5, 2006, at 6:11 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:43:54 -0700 Blake Barnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 7:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
This would allow evas to remain purely within the realm
of non-premul color
Excellent document!
I know a professional editor that I'm going to have look it over.
Here's one thing that's jumped out at me so far:
The stack diagram on this[1] page is wrong, I understand that it's
explained later as being fundamentally flawed, but even still, it's
quite misleading.
You're welcome to host the documentation on edevelop.org. Let me
know of any facilities I can provide. I'm happy to do so.
-Blake
On Jun 27, 2006, at 11:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first full draft of the EFL documentation
is finished. Thanks to Matthew R. Dempsky for
fixing
Guillermo Movia wrote:
Is Emotion needed for something else more than eclair?
I had the same problem. I saw the update solution, but my debian sarge
still has the old version of libxine. If emotion wasn't needed i wait
for the update of the debian package.
It's needed for ewl_media, eclair,
David Seikel wrote:
Until a few hours ago entrance was unmaintained. Apparently xcomp, the
previous maintainer, has become too busy with other things to do much
with it. Earlier today I adopted it. However, I made it perfectly
clear when I adopted it that it will be a few weeks before I can
Didier Casse wrote:
On 11/3/05, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*snip*
Why? Maintained, yes. Per author, no. Separately from CVS,
definitely not. Having it public encourages others to pick up where
the original author left off. CVS is first and foremost a
collaboration tool.
Eric Sandall wrote:
I recently made a package for Source Mage GNU/Linux
(http://www.sourcemage.org/) for eVolume (after seeing the post about
0.0.11 being available, but found only 0.0.14ha1 on the listed URL).
It seems to compile[0] and install[1] just fine, but even after
restarting E17
David Stevenson wrote:
So far I've got four basic entires on my not-oft-visited blog, and I'm
going to add more as I progress (and gradually improve my writing
style). I have also been working on a full creation of an e17 module
article, which I'll post once the module I'm working on is
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
actually - evoak was an entirely different beast. :)
I know it's entirely different, but it _allows_ some of the same
features. And I'm assuming that one of the big reasons for emu is to
allow anyone to create an app that can gain the benefits of the
Blake Barnett wrote:
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
actually - evoak was an entirely different beast. :)
I know it's entirely different, but it _allows_ some of the same
features. And I'm assuming that one of the big reasons for emu is to
allow anyone to create an app
Valtteri Vainikka wrote:
snip
a.) That all staff (and users are welcome too) from all ring sites
(edevelop, get-e, e, elivecd) would join and actively follow this
mailing list.
b.) That all ring sites would have at least most of their critical
announcements and discussions on this mailing
David Seikel wrote:
I'm currently looking through my latest cvs checkout, searching for
existing FAQ's to modify, style guides, and anything else that will
point me in the right direction. Nothing found so far. Any pointers
guys?
CVSROOT/e17/docs/presentations/faq.*
David Seikel wrote:
To say that some consolidation and management of these is needed
would be an understatement.
Guess I just volunteered for that job.
It'd be great if all these references pointed to the same place. If
it's CVS, or the enlightenment.org CMS, or the get-e.org CMS,
Michael Jennings wrote:
Surely the community would not wish to begrudge us even that one small
reimbursement for our time
The community would like to use you up and toss you aside. Or put you
on a pedestal and worship you. Or both, and not necessarily in that order.
-Blake
Andreas Volz wrote:
Am Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:53:03 -0300 schrieb Ivan Hernandez:
I really thin most e users use the sloppy or mouse model... but
most PC users, use click model. that's just because the 3 big players
on the PC desktop are using it. Win32, KDE and Gnome.
Anyway, there is a path
38 matches
Mail list logo
