Hi Vincent,
Could you send me the info for a direct PayPal transfer so I can send the
old funds?
Thanks,
Nathan
On Dec 11, 2011 10:20 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
The paypal account of the french association Enlightenment.fr, which
is used as an account for the
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Gustavo Sverzut
Barbieribarbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
Hello all, but specially Cedric and Jorge as one of you did initial
eina_inlist and we're about to release eina as 1.0 so we need to know
if things need/could be changed to improve things before that.
Today
Hi Vincent,
The Google C++ style guide has a requirement that I would suggest considering.
http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml#Function_Calls
The specific suggestion is that we provide guidance on how to wrap
function definitions and calls that don't fit well on a
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
Hey,
A couple of weeks ago I had added a ticket to the tracker of enlightenment.
(http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/307)
Could you have a look at it, as it solved the segmentation faults that I was
having with
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Peter Wehrfritz peter.wehrfr...@web.de wrote:
Nick Hughart schrieb:
On Fri, 08 May 2009 19:46:26 +0200
Peter Wehrfritz peter.wehrfr...@web.de wrote:
noma...@free.fr schrieb:
Ok another question,
what about the case whene we dont know the stat of the
Attempting to revive this thread...
Do we realistically have the resources to perform the necessary
accounting, paperwork, pay the necessary fee, etc to be outside of
something like the SFC?
IMO, we should avoid the legal hassles as much as possible, unless
there is a significant problem raised
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Nathan Ingersoll ninge...@gmail.com wrote:
I emailed them. Tim requested that his blog be removed from the planet
and the blogging software Ben uses does not support categories. I can
remove Ben since he isn't really active in E any longer, but I'll let
others
I'm willing to mentor again this year.
Also, I think it would be great if we have the same admins as last
year. Things went very well.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:12
:00 AM, Andreas Volz li...@brachttal.net wrote:
Am Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:03:03 -0600 schrieb Nathan Ingersoll:
Great work!
I couldn't read it from below. Does EWL now support Ecore_Evas? Or is
composite support now directly included? Are there any plans for it?
regards
Andreas
I'm pleased
I'm pleased to announce the release of EWL version 0.5.3. This release
has some extensive changes, including the following highlights:
* Version 0.5.3:
- Fixed compile warnings on 64-bit systems
- Improved entry selection and cursor handling
- A variety of bug
, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Toma tomha...@gmail.com wrote:
Im currently working (slowly) on making a BW theme for ewl. Whats the
timeline to the next release? Ill up load my work so far once i get
back home in a few days.
Toma
On 1/5/09, Nathan Ingersoll ninge...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased
, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dj2 was the one maintaining it. Do you have category specific links
for benr and tim? I might have access to the necessary files.
No, I don't. Do you
dj2 was the one maintaining it. Do you have category specific links
for benr and tim? I might have access to the necessary files.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who manages planet.enlightenment.org?
1 - please include raster blog:
Was this exception ever decided?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(forgot AUTHORS in cc list)
PLEASE REPLY (authors on CC list). yes or no to adding static linking
exception
below?
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:53:29 +0200 Michael Feiri
We have ecore_strlcpy available for just this reason.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Enlightenment SVN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
ok go nack to snprintf - strncpy isn't save for overruns of a buffer with 0
termination of string here (need to add ectra code to terminate). in this
Forgot to reply-all.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [E-devel] EWL in a Evas/Edje application?
To: Diogo Dutra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Diogo Dutra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
EWL is somewhat more complicated because it maintains an internal
representation of the data. This is done so that it can build the
entire text representation prior to an evas or any associated evas
object being available. That being said, it may provide some hints
about how to interact with the
A decision has been made on this issue, so let this thread die.
Whether we agree with the decision or not is up to us to act on as
individuals now, and bringing it back to the list won't do any good
but to fan further flames.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Stephen Houston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can we put this on hold until Summer of Code is complete? It's only
another week until that wraps up and I'd like to minimize the time the
students need to spend to accommodate shifting infrastructure during
the end of session crunch.
Thanks,
Nathan
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 1:45 AM, The Rasterman
Much appreciated!
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 8:28 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:08:59 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
Can we put this on hold until Summer of Code is complete? It's only
another week
You're going to completely ignore all of the feedback you received on
this issue and just change the license without a consensus?
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Enlightenment CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : turran
Project : e17
Module : proto/eina
Dir
We don't want the ability to cross-pollinate code with those projects
and they are SEPARATE PROJECTS. The goal of eina was to unify around
one shared data lib, so why would we not be using eina?
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're going to completely ignore all of the feedback you received on
this issue and just change the license without a consensus?
Ok
Really? I have done my best to layout factual reasons and arguments
but have not seen any rebuttals that have attempted to do the same.
On 8/6/08, Viktor Kojouharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:20 -0500, Nick Hughart wrote:
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6,
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Viktor Kojouharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:41 -0500, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
Really? I have done my best to layout factual reasons and arguments
but have not seen any rebuttals that have attempted to do the same.
True, you have. And I
, 2008-08-06 at 15:33 -0500, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're going to completely ignore all of the feedback you received on
this issue
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consensus is how healthy communities operate, so your second point
would be that E is an unhealthy community.
Nathan, E *is* an unhealthy
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Viktor Kojouharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:48 -0500, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
Look at the history of this project and any other complex projects. It
is very common that components get moved from one layer of abstraction
to another
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Timothy P. Horton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a Summer of Code student this year (so, not a /real/ E developer),
and I was planning on keeping my head entirely out of this
conversation, but each email makes that more and more difficult. So
I've decided to
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, it looks like but it isnt. Let me explain. The community
fragmentation is *not only* the license, it is mainly because of point
1. Point 2 is refered to people that won't code on eina and for people
that
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can't tell me that im wrong as i did eina and took the decisions
about it. I have to explain this as this totally wrong. Eina's attempt
was known, i already commented about it on irc and on ml, *with*
So your argument is that you don't need to justify your choices
because you're more active right now?
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Mark Dickie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As another long-term enlightenment user
Also, this is exactly my point about being disrespectful and hurting
the community. You are devaluating the opinions of volunteers in the
community because you get to spend your paid time on it. I still
contribute multiple hours each week to the project either through
reviewing patches, helping
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So your argument is that you don't need to justify your choices
because you're more active right now?
Basically, and because your
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, this is exactly my point about being disrespectful and hurting
the community. You are devaluating the opinions of volunteers
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Christopher Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not much of a lawyer, nor do I claim to know much about LGPL, but if in
fact this is the case and we can't change back at a later date without much
effort, then by all means put me down for the Not Changing crowd
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Zachary Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sort of ancillary to this discussion but as point of fact:
GPL was designed to keep software free, away from people who would
close it and then sell it. The Changing the license is hard with
the GPL is very
For those interested in using Git with SVN, here's a nice getting
started article. It's written from the assumption that you're using
Google Code, but it's really discussing general SVN and Git workflow.
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/05/develop-with-git-on-google-code-project.html
Before this turns completely into another license flame-war. Let's
step back and look at this from a more practical standpoint. I'm going
to list the set of arguments mentioned as to why we need LGPL, since
that is the point being argued, along with questions that would need
to be answered for
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want everyone to always use it, it can be kept as a helper and
people who wish to have an abstract data model (usually void *) and
access it as a list can provide the iterator. I use it in my mvc
lists,
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:19 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and i want to put in other cvs modules:
misc/ - misc/
eterm/ - old/eterm/
web/www - www/
e16/ - old/e16/
e_modules/ - apps/e_modules
Since both Eterm and e16 are actively maintained and use some of the
I want to point out that as the person asking for the change, the
burden of proof is on you. Therefore, look at your statements below
and show us solid proof behind any of them.
For every example you give of an open source project that supposedly
succeeded because of it's license being GPL/LGPL,
Back to the original question... I don't intend to contribute to eina
if it's not BSD. The main reason (beyond my personal preference) is
that it is not consistent with the rest of the repository. This hurts
our ability to shift code within the repository
If I write a nice abstraction in another
Kind of like how you're ignoring every other company that has paid
someone to work on E in the past and had no issue with the license?
On Aug 3, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:48 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because raster did it like that :-D
I'm not sure why people don't want to use a cms, but I've being told
that they want to keep like that (cvs based).
We went through a couple CMS's before, one of which broke
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh of course. details! :) we can dot the i's and cross the t's soon enough. :)
Unfortunately, this really needs to be done sooner than later. Without
a license listed, we now need to get the permission of
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:27 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so eventually went back to an old original method. www lives in cvs - u want
to
work on it, u get cvs access. committing means it auto-updates. if u need to
test the php locally setting up a local apache
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:24 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends on if the projects are using it. You can see features we're
working for Ewl and the discussions we've had about how to implement
them. You can also search for resolved and closed bugs to see what's
implemented
like reddit, digg and slashdot. That way people see all
this interesting stuff going on and want to join in.
Toma
On 7/29/08, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the most recent license flamewar was triggered by the motivation
of community building, I think now would
and then enhance.
4. Documentation
P.S.
I've translated some website pages in italian... Should e italian community
have an its own website, a planet like french community or may i continue to
translate e pages???
2008/8/1 Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That would be useful
I think this discussion has dragged on long enough. There is clearly
not a consensus on the list, which we should require for any decision
of this magnitude. License flamewars are infamous for draining
developer motivation on a project as well as burning up precious time
for all team members. As
Since the most recent license flamewar was triggered by the motivation
of community building, I think now would be an appropriate time to
brainstorm some additional ideas for helping to build the community
around E.
One idea I discussed with Vincent today is that our lack of releases
has caused
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've learned a lot about the licences reading these mails, and it seems
that the fact is not such licence is a hindrance but such licence can
give us developpers. That's different. So, from what i've understood, wrt
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This issue is a long and complex one, and I really have no desire to
get into the specifics of it. You and Nathan and Carsten and maybe many
others,
may feel comfortable with your decisions and choices, and that's
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I dont pretend to start a flamewar, if you do, please dont answer this
thread.The thing is that right now, the EFL has arrived to a place
where different companies are using this software, and several of
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ProFUSION will release its code under LGPL (guarana and possible
others to come). And yes, we think just like you, but the code is
there and the majority of work was done by people that like it, so we
don't
I have also added SoC student Timothy Horton. Other students, please
send me your feed URL if you have one.
Thanks,
Nathan
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, you're added now. There may be a delay until you show up in the
planet, but if you don't
Added.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Sevcsik András [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mine is http://sevcsik.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss .
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have also added SoC student Timothy Horton. Other students, please
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:21 AM, Massimiliano Calamelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:38:46 +0200 (CEST)
Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That question raises another point: the e website can certainly be
improved.
*
I also think it would be a good idea to add student blogs to Planet E
to give their work more exposure.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ravenlock wrote:
All surveys (student and mentor) are now accounted for.
maybe that would be
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Sevcsik András [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made a post to my blog (http://sevcsik.blogspot.com) when you can find a
screenshothttp://bp0.blogger.com/_EHjPYdSoHP4/SHuq3YkWS1I/BCE/mq46Oi_J_eM/s1600-h/eyesight_shot.pngof
the application. Here's the post:
While I know all mentors have received reminders to complete their
midterm surveys, I would like to emphasize the importance of
completing these surveys on time. Not only will it help ensure your
student receives payment for the second half of the summer, but it can
positively impact us in the
and a more direct link to view the code:
http://code.google.com/p/evas-quartz/source/browse
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Timothy P. Horton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a very preliminary version of my Summer of Code project,
the Evas_Quartz engine to Google Code, and opened it up
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:27 AM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We'll have to wait to see if anyone complains. The problem is, we can't
tell if issue is failed parsing or non-existing file. We may need to put
a check in there for non-existant file. But, I don't think we should be
Were these numbers from ecore before or after cedric's changes this morning?
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Peter Wehrfritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday we had a discussion on irc, if we should put abstract data
types of ecore and of evas into a single standalone lib. The whole
In case you missed my question on IRC...
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Enlightenment CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
f = fopen(file, rb);
if (!f) return NULL;
+if (fstat(fileno(f), file_stat)
+|| file_stat.st_size 1)
+{
+fclose(f);
+return
Hi Dariusz,
Thanks for the bug report on this issue. I'll take a closer look at
this and see about getting a fix in the next couple days, but feel
free to submit a patch before I get to it.
Thanks,
Nathan
2008/4/28 Dariusz Knociński [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I found memory leak in procedure
On 30 Mar 2008 14:01:02 +0200, Lukasz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First sorry for my English.
I am a newcomer and I'd like to help in this project. But I have some
question:
I found that e17 theme is e17 theme only, that after applying theme other
that default,
any other EFL app is
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:56 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I repeat what i said on irc, but unit tests are really needed for eet and
its future changes
sure, but not needed for a 1.0.0 :)
I agree for the alpha and beta releases, but it would be really nice
Of course, but given that none exist and it's up to be released, some
kind of compromise has to be made.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Eric Sandall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, March 28 2008 08:39:16 Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:56 AM, The Rasterman Carsten
] wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:39:16 -0500 Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:56 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I repeat what i said on irc, but unit tests are really needed for eet
and
its future changes
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to make it a bit more flexible though, let's also
allow for 'importing' evas objects - if possible (not sure if ewl
has this at the moment, but just in case).
The way we usually do this is outlined in the
In general I don't have any objections to the addition of size hints
to Edje, these could actually be useful to EWL as we could use them in
place of some of the existing size hints we get from Edje. I'm not
really certain why you want the ability to set the min and max sizes
programmatically since
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However you have it (though rel coords would seem best),
if you really want ewl to be a flexible tool for building artistic,
rich apps, then you'll want a natural way to arbitrarily position
child *widgets* - not
Could you add all mentors? They really should be involved in the
selection process.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Ravenlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I'm very please to announce we are officially listed on the Google
Summer of Code page as a mentoring organization: :)
March 3rd is when they start accepting applications. The deadline is March 12th.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Ian C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well considering applications need to be in by when it starts which is
like march 3rd we don't have a lot of time...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running valgrind against it may point out where the leak is occurring,
but it will also require some suppressions as it thinks Python leaks
at times when it manages it's memory allocations.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at
If you search for python suppressions for valgrind, you should find
some that will help make the log shorter and hopefully more useful to
us.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Joost Albers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, given that we've been shot down every year so far, I think
the key question for us to address here is: How do we avoid getting
shot down again?
Once we know we're eligible, I think there's more than
Here is an example of an organizations Ideas page that might help get
things rolling:
http://www.x.org/wiki/SummerOfCodeIdeas
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After some discussion on IRC:
- Going with EFL might be better. As Nathan said
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:30 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have no interest in trying to change their opinion. in the end i think they
see e as a wm - some bizarre corner-case wm that no one cares about anymore
as
everyone uses gnome or kde, and since e17
Are you talking specifically about the menubar in the menubar test or
in another case? The menubar test is not a good example for
aesthetics, as it is intended to test as much menubar related
functionality as possible.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That seems to me like it might be a BIG problem for any
sufficiently flexible use of ewl and evas. :(
Until a more generic solution presents itself, why not have
a separate Ewl_Evas lib, with say a
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Umm... It still sems to me like you'd want some kind of canvas
widget to which one could add arbitrary evas objects to, directly or
indirectly (I believe that etk has something like that), in order to
have
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good questions.. Don't know. A buffer canvas would be nice to
have for several reasons, but as you mention it may not be the best
way to realize a canvas widget for other reasons.. it also depends on
the
The answer is yes and no. You can certainly do this simply by mapping
the theme for a widget to your Edje. The problem is that any events
will automatically have the source set as EWL instead of the clicked
part. The problem is that we do dispatching to the widget inside of
EWL, and w/o an API to
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan wrote:
The answer is yes and no. You can certainly do this simply by
mapping the theme for a widget to your Edje. The problem is that
Is mapping the theme for a widget to your Edje a
On Jan 30, 2008 7:03 AM, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey
here is a more detailed explanation of Jamey about the race condition that
can occur with xcb_poll_for_reply. You know those things better than me,
so you will be able to comment about that on the race in ecore in the ML
On Jan 29, 2008 8:03 AM, Lars Munch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 01:16:24PM -0600, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
I checked the man page for Mac OS X as well. Looks like pselect()
comes from FreeBSD in that case.
Ok, you got me convinced. Attached is a pselect version
I don't see why not, as it should be limited to a single package. Do
you know of anything else that needs to handle this race condition
between select and signals?
On Jan 29, 2008 10:26 AM, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
Oh, even better
On Jan 29, 2008 11:15 AM, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, as we discussed on irc, according to Bart Massey, there might be a
race condition with xcb_poll_for_event in ecore_xcb, but I don't know if
it's the same kind of race or not.
Vincent
It's difficult to know because his
On Jan 29, 2008 9:14 AM, Lars Munch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I might have asked the question wrongly. My current patch already
calls pselect with an empty set of signals, so signals will only be
handled when pselect is called. As an alternative we could do:
_ecore_main_select()
1.
Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 12:40 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:11:41 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Jan 24, 2008 11:42 PM, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 24
Typo on frequently.
On Jan 26, 2008 6:23 AM, Enlightenment CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+pFrecuently updated tutorials and guides for both users and developers./p
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all
I think the proper fix is to use sigprocmask() disable signals, then
rather than using select(), call pselect() which takes a signal mask
and will atomically use that mask during the select. This should fix
the race condition and force signals to be processed simultaneously to
file descriptors.
On Jan 24, 2008 7:18 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now i think this is a bit more generic a solution - but it adds overhead. so
what about the pselect() method? anyone got input on that?
Basically, pselect() is designed for exactly this situation. You block
all of
I think this should be moved to the theme rather than hardcoding it
directly into the lib.
On Jan 24, 2008 9:08 PM, Enlightenment CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : jethomas
Project : e17
Module : libs/ewl
Dir : e17/libs/ewl/src/lib
Modified Files:
Because that is the correct prototype for the use of that function.
Notification before committing obvious patches has never been a
requirement, and giving people a bad attitude about it just
discourages them from helping out.
If you have a problem with this change, direct it to the one that
On Jan 10, 2008 7:53 AM, Cedric BAIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the current eet file format, string are inside the directory
structure, so they don't have a fixed size and it's usefull during
reading to know the size of all directory entries (It's not the direct
result of some math, but it
That would be reasonable as well, as long as it clearly indicates that
it prevents or allows the callback from recurring.
On Jan 7, 2008 6:12 PM, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 08 January 2008, at 00:59:22 (+0100),
Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
I want to add two aliases
1 - 100 of 438 matches
Mail list logo
