the Re: to prepare
for that behavior. Here in E10 you can't do that.
As far as I'm concerned, this is actually two bugs. But at least it should
let us copy just part of the subject - or else don't exclude the Re: in
the search -- or else, exclude the Re: in identifying a subject search.
Or best
On 04/27/01 9:18 PM EDT (-4 hrs UTC), Michael J. Kobb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
I'm a recent addition to the list, and a recent upgrader (from OE) to
Entourage. Overall, I'm very pleased with Entourage, and the enhancements
made since OE.
There are some bugs (I think
.
There are some bugs (I think) that I've found, but before I start asking
about them, I wonder if there's an archive of recent list traffic. I
wouldn't want to bring up stuff that's already been hashed to death.
Best,
--Mike
--
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To search
Hello all!
I'm a recent addition to the list, and a recent upgrader (from OE) to
Entourage. Overall, I'm very pleased with Entourage, and the enhancements
made since OE.
There are some bugs (I think) that I've found, but before I start asking
about them, I wonder if there's an archive
On 4/27/01 6:18 PM, Michael J. Kobb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
I'm a recent addition to the list, and a recent upgrader (from OE) to
Entourage. Overall, I'm very pleased with Entourage, and the enhancements
made since OE.
There are some bugs (I think) that I've found
hing works at all in
AppleScript.
Did we miss all this in the beta process, or was it just not fixable in
time? Are all these bugs known already?
--
Paul Berkowitz
--
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To search the archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/
We try to
keep track of the bugs reported to the list, but there are no guarantees.
Dan
--
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To search the archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/
Title: Re: Two new bugs in Entourage
My original message, although well intentioned and with a valid point or two, must have been really poorly written because it:
1. Offended Paul
2. Confused Dave
3. Resulted in differing interpretations by Alan and Paul over a side issue.
I never thought I
Title: Re: Two new bugs in Entourage
On 10/22/00 11:21 PM, Bruce Klutchko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My original message, although well intentioned and with a valid point or two, must have been really poorly written because it:
1. Offended Paul
2. Confused Dave
3. Resulted in differing
Then why doesn't it say so? And why is there no reminder that OQV will
delete the "Change User" dialog? And why, if the Mac is the greatest
personal computer in the world, can't this be handled automatically? (Like,
"Would you like to shut down OQV so you can do this?)
That's what we (the
On 10/22/00 1:19 PM, "Bruce Klutchko" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then why doesn't it say so? And why is there no reminder that OQV will
delete the "Change User" dialog? And why, if the Mac is the greatest
personal computer in the world, can't this be handled automatically? (Like,
"Would you
My apologies to anyone offended by my tone. It was more meant to be
tongue-in-cheek than it was to be accusatory, but it's a bit harder to
convey nuances of meaning through email.
I greatly appreciate the MBU team and all they have done for us, and all
they continue to do. I also appreciate the
Title: Re: Two new bugs in Entourage
On 10/22/00 7:57 PM, Paul Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/22/00 5:30 PM, Christian M. M. Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SO that is 2 hours and 27 minutes, at least from my email to Pauls email!
;-)
On 10/22/00 7:19 PM, David Cortright [EMAIL
On 10/23/00 00:23, Paul Berkowitz wrote:
Sorry I was out walking my dog
Hmmm...is that one of those euphemisms? :-)
Well, OK, we'll forgive you **this time** for having a life, Paul, but I
can't make any promises about the future. G
George
--
George Clark - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
14 matches
Mail list logo
