Re: [Evergreen] Evergreen LTS

2016-04-11 Thread Ruediger Meier
On Monday 11 April 2016, Michal Kubecek wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:00:42PM +0200, Ruediger Meier wrote: > > Lately I was hoping for the new "SLE-based" LEAP release model. But > > actually it looks like a broken mix of SLE and Tumbleweed. Why it > > doesn't have the same base as SLE-12 as

Re: [Evergreen] Evergreen LTS

2016-04-11 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:27:17PM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:00:42PM +0200, Ruediger Meier wrote: > > > > Lately I was hoping for the new "SLE-based" LEAP release model. But > > actually it looks like a broken mix of SLE and Tumbleweed. Why it > > doesn't have the

Re: [Evergreen] Evergreen LTS

2016-04-11 Thread Michal Kubecek
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:00:42PM +0200, Ruediger Meier wrote: > > Lately I was hoping for the new "SLE-based" LEAP release model. But > actually it looks like a broken mix of SLE and Tumbleweed. Why it > doesn't have the same base as SLE-12 as promised (kernel, systemd)? Can't talk about syst

Re: [Evergreen] Evergreen LTS

2016-04-11 Thread Ruediger Meier
On Sunday 10 April 2016, reinhard hennig wrote: > Some problems occur switching to leap42.1: > much more space for storage needed for repos (64bit and 32bit as > well) that have to be spread in the field via software-delivery (CA). > We need time to customize a new distribution for our clients. We

Re: [Evergreen] Evergreen LTS

2016-04-11 Thread Bruno Friedmann
On dimanche, 10 avril 2016 20.28:43 h CEST reinhard hennig wrote: > Some problems occur switching to leap42.1: > much more space for storage needed for repos (64bit and 32bit as well) > that have to be spread in the field via software-delivery (CA). We need > time to customize a new distribution

Re: [Evergreen] Evergreen LTS

2016-04-10 Thread Per Jessen
reinhard hennig wrote: > Some problems occur switching to leap42.1: > much more space for storage needed for repos (64bit and 32bit as well) > that have to be spread in the field via software-delivery (CA). We > need time to customize a new distribution for our clients. We intended > to switch to

[Evergreen] Evergreen LTS

2016-04-10 Thread reinhard hennig
Some problems occur switching to leap42.1: much more space for storage needed for repos (64bit and 32bit as well) that have to be spread in the field via software-delivery (CA). We need time to customize a new distribution for our clients. We intended to switch to KDE5 from KDE3.5 but my experi