Le 20-mars-07, à 13:02, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
On 3/20/07, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 01-mars-07, à 00:35, Brent Meeker a écrit :
Brent Meeker quoted:
Atheism is a belief system the way Off is a TV channel.
--- George Carlin
Carlin makes the typical
Le 20-mars-07, à 17:07, Brent Meeker a écrit :
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 01-mars-07, à 00:35, Brent Meeker a écrit :
Brent Meeker quoted:
Atheism is a belief system the way Off is a TV channel.
--- George Carlin
Carlin makes the typical confusion between atheism and agnosticism.
Le 20-mars-07, à 18:05, Brent Meeker a écrit :
What are those relations? Is it a matter of the provenance of the
numbers, e.g. being computed by some subprocess of the UD? Or is an
inherent relation like being relatively prime?
It is an inherent relation like being prime, or being the
Stathis and Brent:
ineresting and hard-to-object sentiments.
Would it not make sense to write instead of
we are (thing-wise) -
the term less static, rather process-wise:
We do (in whatever action)?
John M
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker
To:
BRUNO:
I have never met an atheist who does not believe in primitive matter. Well,
today even theist believe in primitive matter, with few exception.
Now, if an atheist does not believe in primitive matter, he certainly believe
in something, all right. And if he does fundamental research, he
Thanks.
On 3/20/07, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could be interested by a paper introducing String theory as a
syntactical logical structure by the other Schmidhuber (Juergen's
brother Christof):
Here:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0011065
What are strings made of? The
Le 21-mars-07, à 15:48, John M a écrit :
BRUNO:
I have never met an atheist who does not believe in primitive matter.
Well, today even theist believe in primitive matter, with few
exception.
Now, if an atheist does not believe in primitive matter, he certainly
believe in something,
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 20-mars-07, à 18:05, Brent Meeker a écrit :
What are those relations? Is it a matter of the provenance of the
numbers, e.g. being computed by some subprocess of the UD? Or is an
inherent relation like being relatively prime?
It is an inherent relation like
John M wrote:
Stathis and Brent:
ineresting and hard-to-object sentiments.
Would it not make sense to write instead of
we are (thing-wise) -
the term less static, rather process-wise:
We do (in whatever action)?
John M
That's part of what I'm struggling with. ISTM that OMs, being
John, with your rich linguistic experience you surely recognise
that English [plain or otherwise] is very much a hybrid language
- and surely many who are forced to learn it as a second or
third language would call it 'b*stard' even. And the way that we
native speakers of English use words from
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 20-mars-07, à 13:02, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
On 3/20/07, *Bruno Marchal* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 01-mars-07, à 00:35, Brent Meeker a écrit :
Brent Meeker quoted:
Atheism is a belief system the way Off is a TV
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 17:46:32 Brent Meeker wrote:
John M wrote:
Stathis and Brent:
ineresting and hard-to-object sentiments.
Would it not make sense to write instead of
we are (thing-wise) -
the term less static, rather process-wise:
We do (in whatever action)?
John M
Thanks, Bruno,
The 'truth' was missing from my post.
there was a technical mistake: from my sentence as mailed:
Being a he you pointed to (rejcted though as 'atheist') I really do
not ' believe. What I
find logically not so repugnant -
one word disappeared in the mailing process. Originally
On 3/22/07, Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John M wrote:
Stathis and Brent:
ineresting and hard-to-object sentiments.
Would it not make sense to write instead of
we are (thing-wise) -
the term less static, rather process-wise:
We do (in whatever action)?
John M
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 3/22/07, *Brent Meeker* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John M wrote:
Stathis and Brent:
ineresting and hard-to-object sentiments.
Would it not make sense to write instead of
we are (thing-wise) -
On 3/22/07, Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 3/22/07, *Brent Meeker* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John M wrote:
Stathis and Brent:
ineresting and hard-to-object sentiments.
Would it not
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 3/22/07, *Brent Meeker* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 3/22/07, *Brent Meeker* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL
17 matches
Mail list logo
