On 21 Dec 2009, at 22:33, Nick P wrote:
Thank you quentin and Bruno...
Right I think I see what Quentin is saying in that we take the
copying procedure as given for the purpose of the experiment however
technically problematic. I think I get part of what you say Bruno.
What I had thought
Hence by it generating all possible emulations of
stages of my life) that I could just as easily experience for my next
OM as opposed to the one i would expect to experience on the current
wetware (or whateverware I'm running on if we are in fact already
software constructs in a simulation).
On 22 Dec 2009, at 18:48, Nick P wrote:
Hence by it generating all possible emulations of
stages of my life) that I could just as easily experience for my
next
OM as opposed to the one i would expect to experience on the current
wetware (or whateverware I'm running on if we are in fact
Hi Bruno
My background is in mathematical physics but I am trying to read up a
bit of this new stuff as I go along. Thank you for being patient with
me.
However, I think you have confirmed some things - let me know if any
of these is fundamentally wrong.
I want to put aside the platonic
On Dec 23, 12:55 am, Nick Prince m...@dtech.fsnet.co.uk wrote:
Hi Bruno
My background is in mathematical physics but I am trying to read up a
bit of this new stuff as I go along. Thank you for being patient with
me.
However, I think you have confirmed some things - let me know if any
of
5 matches
Mail list logo
