The other thing that occurs to me concerning happiness is that many feel that
happiness is something bigger than or more important than a simple feeling
or emotion. To say that smoking cannabis makes you happy will almost certainly
cause some to react that I am trivialising happiness. Nothing
It seems to me that you're just attacking a straw men... it's obvious in
multivalued outcome, that probability doesn't mean only one outcome arise
out of many... so as I said previously if that's what you mean and
attacking us for, it's bad faith on your side.
Quentin
2014-03-13 1:18 GMT+01:00
Yes, I realize you are opposed to GMO, I acknowledge that you are confident of
the climate alarmists, yes, you concede that some Red-Greens (there are none
others) oppose nuclear fission, you would say some of them, and I will claim
nearly all. You write of solar as if it now at hand, to
2014-03-13 11:45 GMT+01:00 spudboy...@aol.com:
Yes, I realize you are opposed to GMO,
I realize you can't read...
I'm quoting him:
for example ***I*** have no patience with ***the view*** *(not his)* (all
too common among those on the left) that GMOs are a dangerous health risk
since *all
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:45 AM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Yes, I realize you are opposed to GMO,
You really have no reading comprehension! My whole point was that I have NO
OBJECTION to GMOs. I said I have no patience with the view (all too common
among those on the left) that GMOs are a
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
because before you initiate a policy that will impoverish the
world for many generations and kill lots and lots and lots of people
What policies are you talking about that would have these supposed
effects?
http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/11/why-thorium-nuclear-isnt-featured-on-cleantechnica/
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/nuclear/
https://www.facebook.com/GreensAgainstNuclear
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/20216b54-8f53-11e3-9cb0-00144feab7de.html
On 12 Mar 2014, at 21:14, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/12/2014 8:33 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hello Terren,
On 12 Mar 2014, at 04:34, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Thanks, that helps. Can you expand a bit on t? Unfortunately I
haven't had the time to follow the modal logic threads, so please
I have little, issue, with Lazer's Green point of view. But, like you have
stated, John, one must address certain political and tech issues to work for a
fix. The proggies don't wish to address this for reasons that appear, to me,
malicious.
We'd need to be able to replace dirty energy with
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Chris de Morsella
cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
66 million years ago 2/3 of all species, not individual animals but
entire species, became extinct quite literally overnight, and 252 million
years ago it was even worse, the extinction rate was 90%. What we're
On 12 Mar 2014, at 21:51, LizR wrote:
On 13 March 2014 04:33, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Hello Terren,
On 12 Mar 2014, at 04:34, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Thanks, that helps. Can you expand a bit on t? Unfortunately I
haven't had the time to follow the modal logic
On 12 Mar 2014, at 20:31, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:38:23 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
OK. Me too. But modern physics has a strong mathematical flavor, and
consciousness seems more to be an immaterial belief or knowledge
than something made of particles, so, if
On 3/13/2014 8:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Mar 2014, at 21:14, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/12/2014 8:33 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hello Terren,
On 12 Mar 2014, at 04:34, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Thanks, that helps. Can you expand a bit on t? Unfortunately I haven't had the
time to
On 3/13/2014 8:33 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Mar 2014, at 21:51, LizR wrote:
On 13 March 2014 04:33, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Hello Terren,
On 12 Mar 2014, at 04:34, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Thanks, that helps. Can you
On 13 Mar 2014, at 09:19, Kim Jones wrote:
The other thing that occurs to me concerning happiness is that many
feel that happiness is something bigger than or more important
than a simple feeling or emotion. To say that smoking cannabis
makes you happy will almost certainly cause some to
On 13 Mar 2014, at 17:56, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/13/2014 8:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Mar 2014, at 21:14, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/12/2014 8:33 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hello Terren,
On 12 Mar 2014, at 04:34, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Thanks, that helps. Can you expand a bit on
I realize that your comment does nothing to enhance your ideology, nor, enforce
conformity to a Green/Red worldview. The discussion is not about problem
solving, but about enforcement of the ideology. Plus, I do find long written
dissertations tiresome for the forum. Brevity is always
On 13 Mar 2014, at 18:03, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/13/2014 8:33 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Mar 2014, at 21:51, LizR wrote:
On 13 March 2014 04:33, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Hello Terren,
On 12 Mar 2014, at 04:34, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Thanks, that helps. Can you
On 3/13/2014 11:43 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Mar 2014, at 18:03, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/13/2014 8:33 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Mar 2014, at 21:51, LizR wrote:
On 13 March 2014 04:33, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Hello Terren,
On 12 Mar
(Do everyone see a lozenge here: ◊ ?)
Yes I do!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to
Interesting! I see the first article has been rebutted...
http://energyfromthorium.com/ieer-rebuttal/
...personally I am in favour of safe nuclear, assuming it is in fact safe.
The problem being that when it wasn't, it was used a lot, so it's got a
very bad rep.
On 14 March 2014 04:16,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
On 14 March 2014 12:54, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Please note, the way to either techs success is not through energy
starvation, nor abandoning the world to poverty.
I hope nobody in their right mind is actually advocating this. I'd like to
live a long time and visit other stars, not live
On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 4:56:04 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:17 PM, ghi...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
I think on the scale of 4 billion years the sort of margin we're
talking about is that necessary to keep water liquid on the surface.
At least twice
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:10:45AM +1300, LizR wrote:
(Do everyone see a lozenge here: ◊ ?)
Yes I do!
Not me (alas). Although it is visible when typing my response.
Cheers
--
Prof Russell Standish
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH2QXQu-HGE
A brief, handy rebuttal to materialistic views of consciousness. I would go
further, and say that information, even though it is immaterial in its
conception, is still derived from the principles of object interaction.
Even when forms and functions
On 13 Mar 2014, at 20:05, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/13/2014 11:43 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Mar 2014, at 18:03, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/13/2014 8:33 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Mar 2014, at 21:51, LizR wrote:
On 13 March 2014 04:33, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Hello Terren,
On 13 Mar 2014, at 22:10, LizR wrote:
(Do everyone see a lozenge here: ◊ ?)
Yes I do!
Nice, I hope everyone see it. Does someone not see a lozenge? Here: ◊
Do someone not see Gödel's second theorem here: ◊t - ~[]◊t ?
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are
On 14 Mar 2014, at 01:49, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:10:45AM +1300, LizR wrote:
(Do everyone see a lozenge here: ◊ ?)
Yes I do!
Not me (alas).
Damned. I will need to use the more ugly instead of the cute ◊ !
No problem.
Bruno
Although it is visible when
On 3/13/2014 9:54 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
which was my objection to writing t. In such a formula, t can only be regarded as
shorthand for some tautology.
If you want. Any simple provable proposition would do.
Then f also occurs in every world since (p ~p) can be formed in every world. But
On 14 Mar 2014, at 06:08, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/13/2014 9:54 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
which was my objection to writing t. In such a formula, t can
only be regarded as shorthand for some tautology.
If you want. Any simple provable proposition would do.
Then f also occurs in every world
31 matches
Mail list logo
