From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 6:11 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Atheist
On 25 July 2014 12:48, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
I agree to an extent, but this sort of argument tends to drift towards
tautology. Whatever survives survives, and hence has survival value in some
sense. But a meme that turns someone into a suicide bomber or celibate monk
probably doesn't have much survival value for that person. My feeling is
Hi Alberto,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
wrote:
Cultural determism is incompatible with natural selection. That was
plainly demonstrated by Symons in his book The evolution of human
sexuality ,but it is common sense among evolutionists of any kind.
Memes cannot survive without a human brain. We are their vehicle, but
are the our effluent, or our children?
-Original Message-
From: LizR lizj...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, Jul 25, 2014 3:47 am
Subject: Re: Atheist
I agree to an extent,
On 23 Jul 2014, at 21:21, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
PGC,
I am not being critical of Bruno. I just do not
On 24 Jul 2014, at 04:32, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:36:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
PGC,
I am not being critical of Bruno. I just do not understand
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 21:21, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM
On 24 July 2014 22:18, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
To put it another way, there is nobody present for whom it could
represent a difference.
It still exist, or the difference 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... will need
itself a knower to make sense. But with comp, we don't need more
than
Thanks for posting, Brent. Fine topics to dig into when one takes the time.
And if we never take the time for these things, how can we ever expect to
derive proper energetic eigenvalues for hydrogen like stuff in the wave
we're surfing on, independent of distracting deadlines?
The hard answer
On 24 July 2014 22:44, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
So I think you just saying I am missing the qualia - but that's the part
that I think it is unreasonable to ask for an explanation of. In what terms
can it be explained - I'd say none. And I don't think your explanation in
terms of
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 12:48 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Atheist
I agree to an extent, but this sort of argument tends to drift towards
tautology. Whatever
On 24 Jul 2014, at 19:40, meekerdb wrote:
This may clarify (or provoke) discussion of Moscow vs. Washington.
It's interesting that Carroll and Sebens use FPI and Sean says it
increases his confidence in Everett's MWI. But in his penultimate
paragraph he essentially lays out an
On 24 Jul 2014, at 20:24, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/24/2014 11:09 AM, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 July 2014 18:40, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
This may clarify (or provoke) discussion of Moscow vs. Washington.
It's interesting that Carroll and Sebens use FPI and Sean says it
increases
On 24 Jul 2014, at 23:44, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/24/2014 1:37 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 20:35, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/23/2014 10:25 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 18:14, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/22/2014 12:08 AM, Kim Jones wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 2:55 am,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
HI Jesse, David,
On 23 Jul 2014, at 18:49, Jesse Mazer wrote:
Had some trouble following your post (in part because I don't know all the
acronyms), but are you talking about the basic problem of deciding which
15 matches
Mail list logo
