On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Pilar Morales
pilarmorales...@gmail.com wrote:
Does Comp address ego little or not, or super human powers, or theory
brewing? How about miracles, and temporarily apparent
Does Comp address ego little or not, or super human powers, or theory
brewing? How about miracles, and temporarily apparent,
and non-repeatable, break down of laws of physics?
For example, in the early 1900s, there was a man walking through the woods
and found himself staring at someone, just as
I agree that math should probably not be taught in school, but algebra. In
elementary school. But, all the student's questions would lead to math...
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:33 AM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
After a resounding NO the question: who's math? I find it absolutely
Craig, I'm wondering what would make my internal processes come up with not
identical, but similar conclusions to what your theory seems to suggest. I
went through your page and could relate to the questions you posed and saw a
reflection of my own tendencies to integrate absolutely everything I
the
off state, it needs the zeroes. Zero is information: not that, you're
right: not physical, not form.
All the Best,
Pilar
Best regards
John M
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:34 PM, RMahoney rmaho...@poteau.com wrote:
On Aug 11, 3:48 pm, Pilar Morales pilarmorales...@gmail.com wrote
meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
**
On 8/12/2011 2:08 PM, Pilar Morales wrote:
I see you take it for granted that the Universe was born. Was it
indeed? Maybe OUR universe was, but I speak about the World (Multiverse,
none of them necessarily identical in any sense) in which we inhabit a
pretty
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:55 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 8/12/2011 5:28 PM, Pilar Morales wrote:
or a magnetron, which to me, gravitation and magnetism are manifestations
of the same force, just different reactions to interactions.
Andre Sakharov wrote a famous paper
Roger,
Sorry to butt in, but I was also thoroughly confused. It seems to me that
you are re-discovering zero 0, as representing a concept of the absence
of any thing.
If you mean that zero is our concept of non existence, and that zero is
defined, not by its attributes, but by the absence of
Hello Rex, thank you for generating this tread. Nice subject title. My
comments below
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
If evolution by natural selection were correct, then it seems to me that if
the overall environment remained relatively stable for an
9 matches
Mail list logo
