On Feb 14, 5:44 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 14 Feb 2012, at 20:17, Craig Weinberg wrote:
It's not clear to me what the difference would really be between
emerging from truth and embodying logic.
You tell me. Emerging from arithmetical truth just means true in
On 12 Feb 2012, at 18:54, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I'm assuming the observations of quantum mechanics, but not the
interpretations.
So you assume QM?
I think that what we measure at that level is literally the
most 'common sense' of matter, and not an independent phenomena.
It is
the
On Feb 14, 7:56 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 12 Feb 2012, at 18:54, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I'm assuming the observations of quantum mechanics, but not the
interpretations.
So you assume QM?
I assume the observations, but not the interpretations. For example: I
assume
On 12 Feb 2012, at 01:01, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Feb 11, 3:51 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 11 Feb 2012, at 15:56, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Dennett's Comp:
Human 1p = 3p(3p(3p)) -
What do you mean precisely by np(np) n = 1 or 3. ?
I'm using 1p or 3p as names only, first
On Feb 12, 6:54 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 12 Feb 2012, at 01:01, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Dennett's Comp:
Human 1p = 3p(3p(3p)) -
What do you mean precisely by np(np) n = 1 or 3. ?
I'm using 1p or 3p as names only, first person direct
phenomenology or
third person
On 11 Feb 2012, at 03:01, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Dennett's Comp:
Human 1p = 3p(3p(3p)) -
What do you mean precisely by np(np) n = 1 or 3. ?
Subjectivity is an illusion
And I guess we agree that this is total nonsense.
Machine 1p = 3p(3p(3p)) - Subjectivity is not considered formally
On Feb 11, 4:03 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 11 Feb 2012, at 03:01, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Dennett's Comp:
Human 1p = 3p(3p(3p)) -
What do you mean precisely by np(np) n = 1 or 3. ?
I'm using 1p or 3p as names only, first person direct phenomenology or
third person
On 11 Feb 2012, at 15:56, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Feb 11, 4:03 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 11 Feb 2012, at 03:01, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Dennett's Comp:
Human 1p = 3p(3p(3p)) -
What do you mean precisely by np(np) n = 1 or 3. ?
I'm using 1p or 3p as names only, first
On Feb 11, 3:51 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 11 Feb 2012, at 15:56, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Dennett's Comp:
Human 1p = 3p(3p(3p)) -
What do you mean precisely by np(np) n = 1 or 3. ?
I'm using 1p or 3p as names only, first person direct phenomenology or
third person
Dennett's Comp:
Human 1p = 3p(3p(3p)) - Subjectivity is an illusion
Machine 1p = 3p(3p(3p)) - Subjectivity is not considered formally
My view:
Human 1p = (1p(1p(1p))) - Subjectivity a fundamental sense modality
which is qualitatively enriched in humans through multiple organic
nestings.
Machine
10 matches
Mail list logo
