On Aug 23, 7:44 pm, Colin Geoffrey Hales cgha...@unimelb.edu.au
wrote:
[Col] Nope. They won't/don't. It may (not shown conclusively yet) cause
cellular malfunction in humans (like glioma). In inorganic replication, they
will not be subject to biological malfunction because all the biological
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:01 AM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Stathis, allow me to barge in before Craig.
I am glad you ask - the wrong question,
I am not FOR the brain to think, it is a tool working in the process we did
not so far deciphered. (That's exactly MY agnosticism). So we
Stathis wrote:
*So you agree that chemistry, which is all that the brain contains, is
**no more magical than electronics?*
*
*
* - - - -O B J E C T I O N ! - - -*
you added which is all that the brain contains smuggled into my position,
which contains ...all we know today and include into the
On Aug 23, 5:53 pm, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Stathis wrote:
*So you agree that chemistry, which is all that the brain contains, is
**no more magical than electronics?*
*
*
* - - - -O B J E C T I O N ! - - -*
you added which is all that the brain contains smuggled into my
On 8/23/2011 3:33 PM, Colin Geoffrey Hales wrote:
I’ve just had a whole bunch of fun at the Melbourne Singularity
Summit. What a ‘hoot’!
At the conference I made a somewhat thwarted attempt to introduce
physical replication as a ‘roadmap item’ for AGI. I tried to show that
AGI may be
[Col] I've just had a whole bunch of fun at the Melbourne Singularity Summit.
What a 'hoot'!
At the conference I made a somewhat thwarted attempt to introduce physical
replication as a 'roadmap item' for AGI. I tried to show that AGI may be
reached by constructing the actual necessary physics
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Colin Geoffrey Hales
cgha...@unimelb.edu.au wrote:
[Col] I’ve just had a whole bunch of fun at the Melbourne Singularity
Summit. What a ‘hoot’!
Really sorry I couldn't attend last weekend.
--
Stathis Papaioannou
--
You received this message because you are
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:36 AM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Craig,
you know more about the 'IBM-Synapse' achievement than myself (easy: I know
nothing, did not even thopughtfully decipher the article in all its
details).
I would ask IBM (they may not reply of course) if their
On Aug 20, 9:36 pm, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Craig,
you know more about the 'IBM-Synapse' achievement than myself (easy: I know
nothing, did not even thopughtfully decipher the article in all its
details).
I would ask IBM (they may not reply of course) if their machine (chip?) can
Stathis, allow me to barge in before Craig.
I am glad you ask - * the wrong question*,
I am not FOR the brain to think, it is a tool working in the process we did
not so far deciphered. (That's exactly MY agnosticism). So we are talking
about tools, be it 'chemistry' (an explanational figment of
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-14574747
Looks like we may be finding out sooner rather than later whether
there is more to the psyche than networking logic.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send
11 matches
Mail list logo
